Re: [gentoo-amd64] Sandbox violations

2007-08-08 Thread B. Nice
Peter, I'm running a non-~amd64 box as well. My package.keywords file is getting rather large, but it's still a stable system. I'd have to guess that it is something with the new kernel, as I'm running x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-100.14.09 under the 2.6.20-gentoo-r8 kernel and not having

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Sandbox violations

2007-08-08 Thread Joerg Gollnick
Am Dienstag 07 August 2007 10:20 schrieb Peter Humphrey: Has anyone here had problems with emerge's sandbox? This is an amd64 box, not ~amd64, and a few days ago the kernel was upgraded from 2.6.20-r8 to 2.6.21-r4. Since then I've had quite a few packages fall over with a sandbox violation. I

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Sandbox violations

2007-08-08 Thread Beso
2007/8/8, B. Nice [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Peter, I'm running a non-~amd64 box as well. My package.keywords file is getting rather large, but it's still a stable system. I'd have to guess that it is something with the new kernel, as I'm running x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-100.14.09 under

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Sandbox violations

2007-08-07 Thread Beso
have you switched to the no-multilib profile by chance?! or do you have an nvidia package?! try adding -sandbox to your features in the make.conf and see if it works. 2007/8/7, Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone here had problems with emerge's sandbox? This is an amd64 box, not