R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the only thing i know of that needs LT is Xen, and they're already
> working on NPTL support.
Also the (user space) driver from Epson for the Stylus Photo R800
printer needs Linuxthreads. While much of this is available in source
code form, it includes a coup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
grepped the tree tonight for ebuilds which inherit (deprecated)
gcc.eclass. Attache is a list of packages that have at least one ebuild
that matches "^inherit.*gcc".
Please use toolchain-funcs.eclass where possible. Also, Diego
(Flameeyes) as
On Sunday 15 May 2005 04:54 pm, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Please use toolchain-funcs.eclass where possible.
note that the only syntax change you need to make is:
gcc-getCC -> tc-getCC
gcc-getCXX -> tc-getCXX
otherwise toolchain-funcs should drop in nicely for gcc
> Also, Diego
> (Flameeyes) asked
Would have been nice to get this email before portage started griping a day or
so ago.
On Sunday 15 May 2005 16:54, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> grepped the tree tonight for ebuilds which inherit (deprecated)
> gcc.eclass. Attache is a list of packages that have at least one ebuild
> that m
one advantage that other binary based package managers have over Gentoo is
ease of recovery from broken core packages ... break your gcc ? no problem !
simply do `apt-get install gcc` or `rpm -i gcc` or whatever
my proposal is to implement a new utility (called 'erescue' for lack of a
better
On Sunday 15 May 2005 05:11 pm, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Would have been nice to get this email before portage started griping a day
> or so ago.
portage isnt griping, gcc.eclass is because i put it there
besides, i didnt use caps and i said 'Please', so it's just a friendly
notice !
-mike
--
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 17:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> one advantage that other binary based package managers have over Gentoo is
> ease of recovery from broken core packages ... break your gcc ? no problem !
>
> simply do `apt-get install gcc` or `rpm -i gcc` or whatever
>
> my proposal
On Sunday 15 May 2005 23:03, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> even better, you should ask yourself why you need to check the gcc version
> and see if you cant make it make work properly regardless of the version
Wow! For the first time I was already doing the right thing without SpanKY
telling me that :D
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 17:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> my proposal is to implement a new utility (called 'erescue' for lack of a
> better name) that is written in C and designed to be statically linked ...
> then next time you break a core system package which cannot be recovered by
> simply
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 17:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> one advantage that other binary based package managers have over Gentoo is
> ease of recovery from broken core packages ... break your gcc ? no problem !
>
> simply do `apt-get install gcc` or `rpm -i gcc` or whatever
>
> my proposal
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 17:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 15 May 2005 05:11 pm, Michael Cummings wrote:
> > Would have been nice to get this email before portage started griping a day
> > or so ago.
>
> portage isnt griping, gcc.eclass is because i put it there
>
> besides, i didnt use
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> [...]
Use `quickpkg` before dangerous updates/merges. If something brakes -
untar the package.
--
Krzysiek 'Nelchael' Pawlik RLU #322999[EMAIL PROTECTED]
gentoo base system - kernel 2.6.11-ck8 GPG:0x7E226904
http://fatcat.ftj.agh.edu.pl/~nelchael
On Sunday 15 May 2005 05:24 pm, Tom Wesley wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 17:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 May 2005 05:11 pm, Michael Cummings wrote:
> > > Would have been nice to get this email before portage started griping a
> > > day or so ago.
> >
> > portage isnt griping, g
Thanks! Just the cue I needed :)
On Sunday 15 May 2005 17:03, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 15 May 2005 04:54 pm, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> > Please use toolchain-funcs.eclass where possible.
>
> note that the only syntax change you need to make is:
> gcc-getCC -> tc-getCC
> gcc-getCXX -> tc-getC
Danny van Dyk wrote:
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
I don't see any gentoo-sources ebuilds using this. Can you please re-check?
Thanks
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 15 May 2005 22:54:20 +0200
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> net-im/bitlbee
Fixed.
Cheers,
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
pgpcThbNhS88K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:
> Use `quickpkg` before dangerous updates/merges. If something brakes -
> untar the package.
Doesn't work too well when tar's broken too. =)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCh84IXVaO67S1rt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Drake schrieb:
>>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> I don't see any gentoo-sources ebuilds using this. Can you please re-check?
Ok, i seem to have used the wrong tree (a bit outdated CVS instead
livetree, sorry). Here is a new list which still consists
Heres the easiest way to do your "erescue"
dd if=/dev/hda of=backup.iso
"Three days later: AAAHHH! I blew up the /usr dir!"
mkdir /backup
mount -o loop backup.iso /backup
cp -f -r -a /backup/usr /
Pretty simple no?
And there you have it. Backup shouldnt really be the burdon of
developers. T
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> Use `quickpkg` before dangerous updates/merges. If something brakes -
>> untar the package.
>
> Doesn't work too well when tar's broken too. =)
Use static tar na bzip2 ;) Seriously: I'm for erescue (or whatever name
will be chosen).
--
Krzysiek 'Nelchael' Pawlik RL
On Monday 16 May 2005 00:42, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> media-video/cinelerra
I've specifically ignored this package as it needs to go away very soon. It's
p.masked, also.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
pgpRtj
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 00:42 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Daniel Drake schrieb:
> >>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> > I don't see any gentoo-sources ebuilds using this. Can you please re-check?
> Ok, i seem to have used the wrong tree (a bit outdated
* On Sun May-15-2005 at 04:48:04 PM -0600, Ryan said:
[...]
> something, then its your fault for not having a backup. Of coarse this
> is just ONE way to backup. There are a bazillion ways to do it. The
> choice is up to you. Besides, if you are running the unstable branch
And if Gentoo provide
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 03:32:40PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:
> > Use `quickpkg` before dangerous updates/merges. If something brakes -
> > untar the package.
>
> Doesn't work too well when tar's broken too. =)
How about statically linking a version of tar with porta
On Sunday 15 May 2005 07:41 pm, david stanek wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 03:32:40PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:
> > > Use `quickpkg` before dangerous updates/merges. If something brakes -
> > > untar the package.
> >
> > Doesn't work too well when tar's broken too.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lance Albertson schrieb:
> Probably best to make a bug to track this instead of tracking it on a
> ML :)
Jupp. See BUG #92745 ;-)
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
On Sunday 15 May 2005 16:41, david stanek wrote:
> Add an option to emerge, --backup or something
> similar, that will automatically run quickpkg.
If you set FEATURES="buildpkg", portage automatically makes binary packages
for you. No need to add new support.
pgpqwMjzk44tL.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 06:12:13PM -0700, John Myers wrote:
> On Sunday 15 May 2005 16:41, david stanek wrote:
> > Add an option to emerge, --backup or something
> > similar, that will automatically run quickpkg.
>
> If you set FEATURES="buildpkg", portage automatically makes binary packages
> fo
On Sun, 2005-15-05 at 17:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> for example, when i broke binutils in unstable with a gcc4 patch, i noticed
> that it's hard for users to *easily* recover from this ... we developers end
> up scrambling to build a bunch of binary packages for a variety of compatible
>
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:56:54PM -0400, David Stanek wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 06:12:13PM -0700, John Myers wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 May 2005 16:41, david stanek wrote:
> > > Add an option to emerge, --backup or something
> > > similar, that will automatically run quickpkg.
> >
> > If you
* On Sun May-15-2005 at 05:18:06 PM -0400, Mike Frysinger said:
[...]
> my proposal is to implement a new utility (called 'erescue' for lack of a
> better name) that is written in C and designed to be statically linked ...
> then next time you break a core system package which cannot be recovered
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:07:15PM -0700, Sami Samhuri wrote:
> * On Sun May-15-2005 at 05:18:06 PM -0400, Mike Frysinger said:
> [...]
> > my proposal is to implement a new utility (called 'erescue' for lack of a
> > better name) that is written in C and designed to be statically linked ...
> >
32 matches
Mail list logo
