On Wednesday 25 May 2005 06:20 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to
> get new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
last chance !
can someone forward the original e-mail here to gentoo-user ?
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailin
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 18:02, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
>
> That reminds me, there are enough of us in Virginia that there should be
> a some sort of get together sometime.
Throwing this in the direction of -dev instead, but please send replies
directly (we can manage a little cc: action). Any
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 16:50 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
> A new developer has joined our ranks. His name is Colin Kingsley (tercel) and
> he will be taking over maintenance of mirrorselect, in addition to working on
> a
> few other things.
Sigh - A new developer who gets the ability to break not o
Maybe I'm missing something here but what does this do that the current
ebuilds that access CVS don't do? The current ebuilds - using the CVS eclass
fetch the most current CVS version, then you do whatever you need to do just
like a regular ebuild. If you need the updated CVS you just emer
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 03:13 pm, Timo Horstschäfer wrote:
> A few day ago i thought about ebuilds without a version number.
there's a bug open atm to get a '_cvs' version tag to go along with '_alpha',
'_beta', and all that but development of it has been slow (or not at all)
> The thing is to
A few day ago i thought about ebuilds without a version number.
The thing is to fetch all files via cvs and then do the things you do
with a normal ebuild.
After fetching the files all the content will be packed into a bz2
archive and saved in /usr/portage/distfiles/
i.e. if i emerge again the sto
By chance does anybody have most of the functions
from /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage_versions.py hashed out in c?
--
Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:25:00PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> I'd be for having RDEPEND required to be set manually. ;)
As would I, actually...
Granted it's a useful convenience, but it also makes nailing the deps
down much harder. Personally down the line, I'd like to see packages
that requi
On Thursday 02 June 2005 00:21, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 01/06/2005-23:25:00(+0900): Jason Stubbs types
>
> >...
> > Perhaps, further down the track we'd be able to work out something with
> > the build farm thingy; check for linkage and warn if things specified in
> > RDEPEND aren't linke
maillog: 01/06/2005-23:25:00(+0900): Jason Stubbs types
>...
> Perhaps, further down the track we'd be able to work out something with the
> build farm thingy; check for linkage and warn if things specified in RDEPEND
> aren't linked against and build up a whitelist from it... Perhaps repoman
>
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 09:55, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 30 May 2005 08:51 pm, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:32:45AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Sunday 29 May 2005 01:48 am, Alec Warner wrote:
> > > > The actual fix to the bug is a minor one, a small check to
11 matches
Mail list logo
