Re: [gentoo-dev] a #g-d first impression might represent process and metastructure

2005-06-10 Thread Daniel Goller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Northrup wrote: | Joshua Baergen wrote: | | |>>2) There are gentoo.org references to #gentoo-dev, but the process of |>>interfacing, mentoring, and recruiting are self-referential beginning |>>with a bootstrap of being on the good side of an exis

Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering

2005-06-10 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 10/06/2005-13:19:30(-0400): Aron Griffis types > Btw, here's an interesting statistic which really doesn't add to (or > detract from, I hope) this discussion... > > grep -hr --include=\*.ebuild '^KEYWORDS=' /usr/portage | perl -ne ' > s/[^[:lower:]\s]//; @F = split; @S = sort @F; $sor

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcing Gentoo Universe

2005-06-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Drake wrote: > Gentoo Universe can be found at http://planet.gentoo.org/universe/ > > Currently, there isn't a great amount of difference between the two sites. > This will change as more people give me their entire feed URL's. Now we can star

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcing Gentoo Universe

2005-06-10 Thread Aron Griffis
Daniel Drake wrote: [Fri Jun 10 2005, 02:01:14PM EDT] > If you host your weblog at http://planet.gentoo.org/developers How does one get signed up to host a weblog there? Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer pgpTvAhZdS9GJ.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] GDP: Mid-year status update

2005-06-10 Thread Sven Vermeulen
Hi all, In the beginning of the year, I have posted the "New Year Goals" for the Gentoo Documentation Project [1], listing a few bigger topics we would like to address in this year. Now that we are half-way, I would like to inform you about the progress the GDP has made since then. For your refer

[gentoo-dev] Announcing Gentoo Universe

2005-06-10 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, It's been running for about a week already but its about time it was properly announced :) It seems that we have a fairly even split of opinions on whether Planet Gentoo should be strictly for Gentoo and related topics, or whether it should be a full aggregation of more personal articles plus

Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering

2005-06-10 Thread Aron Griffis
foser wrote:[Fri Jun 10 2005, 10:55:17AM EDT] > As the threadstarter indicated, this was done without discussing it > and in the knowledge that there was no agreement on this issue. As > said before, the fact that something gets done some way, doesn't > mean it's right to do it that way. Not t

Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering

2005-06-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 10 June 2005 10:55 am, foser wrote: > > If everyone starts using ekeyword now with the alphabetical ordering > > built in, everything will be consistent, and there shouldn't be a > > problem. > > even vapier indicates > that there really is no reason to do it alphabetically, except maybe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of articles.xml from website

2005-06-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sven Vermeulen wrote: > Many Gentoo developers have written articles about Linux and Gentoo on > third-party sites. The articles page [1] was originally meant to provide > links to those articles. However, it frequently occurs that links change > (most

Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering

2005-06-10 Thread foser
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 11:50 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote: > Whoever said we were voting? I was just showing my support for > alphabetical keyword ordering. Remember, alphabetical keywording is > *already* implemented in ekeyword, and we are discussing whether or not > to revert it. As the thr

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Removal of articles.xml from website

2005-06-10 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:39:57AM +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > I know from Daniel that DW takes the exclusive rights to publish the > articles for the first X months (I believe it was 6 months, but don't take > my word on it). We are allowed to republish those articles later (as we've > done wit

Re: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo?

2005-06-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Stuart Herbert wrote: >>There have been some really interesting points brought up recently >>about "where is Gentoo going?" > > It feels like this topic comes up every year :) I'd say it should come up a little more often :) >>I have been wondering that myself. >>Some people seem to think that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of articles.xml from website

2005-06-10 Thread Shyam Mani
On 06/10/2005 03:09 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > my word on it). We are allowed to republish those articles later (as we've > done with for instance an article about CVS), even in the form of a GuideXML > document. Sounds excellent! > Perhaps we can add all articles to our own repository? If we p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of articles.xml from website

2005-06-10 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:54:49AM +0530, Shyam Mani wrote: > That said, amybe we can can contact DW and ask for a permalink of sorts? > Or if we could mirrior the article on our site? Any other solutions? I know from Daniel that DW takes the exclusive rights to publish the articles for the first