Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of articles.xml from website

2005-06-10 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:54:49AM +0530, Shyam Mani wrote: That said, amybe we can can contact DW and ask for a permalink of sorts? Or if we could mirrior the article on our site? Any other solutions? I know from Daniel that DW takes the exclusive rights to publish the articles for the first

Re: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo?

2005-06-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Stuart Herbert wrote: There have been some really interesting points brought up recently about where is Gentoo going? It feels like this topic comes up every year :) I'd say it should come up a little more often :) I have been wondering that myself. Some people seem to think that Gentoo has

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Removal of articles.xml from website

2005-06-10 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:39:57AM +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote: I know from Daniel that DW takes the exclusive rights to publish the articles for the first X months (I believe it was 6 months, but don't take my word on it). We are allowed to republish those articles later (as we've done with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of articles.xml from website

2005-06-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sven Vermeulen wrote: Many Gentoo developers have written articles about Linux and Gentoo on third-party sites. The articles page [1] was originally meant to provide links to those articles. However, it frequently occurs that links change (most

Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering

2005-06-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 10 June 2005 10:55 am, foser wrote: If everyone starts using ekeyword now with the alphabetical ordering built in, everything will be consistent, and there shouldn't be a problem. even vapier indicates that there really is no reason to do it alphabetically, except maybe that

Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering

2005-06-10 Thread Aron Griffis
foser wrote:[Fri Jun 10 2005, 10:55:17AM EDT] As the threadstarter indicated, this was done without discussing it and in the knowledge that there was no agreement on this issue. As said before, the fact that something gets done some way, doesn't mean it's right to do it that way. Not to

[gentoo-dev] Announcing Gentoo Universe

2005-06-10 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, It's been running for about a week already but its about time it was properly announced :) It seems that we have a fairly even split of opinions on whether Planet Gentoo should be strictly for Gentoo and related topics, or whether it should be a full aggregation of more personal articles

[gentoo-dev] GDP: Mid-year status update

2005-06-10 Thread Sven Vermeulen
Hi all, In the beginning of the year, I have posted the New Year Goals for the Gentoo Documentation Project [1], listing a few bigger topics we would like to address in this year. Now that we are half-way, I would like to inform you about the progress the GDP has made since then. For your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcing Gentoo Universe

2005-06-10 Thread Aron Griffis
Daniel Drake wrote: [Fri Jun 10 2005, 02:01:14PM EDT] If you host your weblog at http://planet.gentoo.org/developers How does one get signed up to host a weblog there? Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer pgpTvAhZdS9GJ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcing Gentoo Universe

2005-06-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Drake wrote: Gentoo Universe can be found at http://planet.gentoo.org/universe/ Currently, there isn't a great amount of difference between the two sites. This will change as more people give me their entire feed URL's. Now we can start

Re: [gentoo-dev] a #g-d first impression might represent process and metastructure

2005-06-10 Thread Daniel Goller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Northrup wrote: | Joshua Baergen wrote: | | |2) There are gentoo.org references to #gentoo-dev, but the process of |interfacing, mentoring, and recruiting are self-referential beginning |with a bootstrap of being on the good side of an existing