-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:53:50 -0400 Nathan L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Because that won't help in the slightest.
|
| So you're saying that peer review is good, but peer reviewing things
| by default is bad?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:03:18 -0400 Nathan L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:53:50 -0400 Nathan L. Adams
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
| | Because that won't help in
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:31:30 -0400 Nathan L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Not at all. I'm saying that a) most 'team leads' will not do proper
| checks because they don't have time to and b) the limited time that
| 'team leads' have is better spent elsewhere.
|
| I really am curious here:
|
On Aug 19, 2005, at 8:56 PM, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
*sigh*
Please stay away from that bug. It is assigned to the games team,
as it
is a games bug, and it will be gotten to when we have the time and
not
before.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Reviewing an ebuild has nothing to do with inclusion. For inclusion in
the tree, it also needs to be tested.
You don't take the slightest look at an ebuild (the code) before
including it? Anyhow, whether its testing or
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 01:13:37PM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Reviewing an ebuild has nothing to do with inclusion. For inclusion in
the tree, it also needs to be tested.
You don't take the slightest look at an ebuild (the code) before
including it? Anyhow,
* Ciaran McCreesh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:55:32 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | Nope, because I'm not marking things as I will include this.
|
| According to
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
I've been going through the EBUILD list at random and providing lists of
things that need to be fixed before the ebuild can be considered for
inclusion. The WONTFIX resolution along with a comment asking for the
submitter to reopen with a fixed ebuild is used when problems
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:06:34 -0600 R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| I've been going through the EBUILD list at random and providing
| lists of things that need to be fixed before the ebuild can be
| considered for inclusion. The WONTFIX resolution along with a
|
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:31:30AM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
I really am curious here:
a) What are the team leads spending most of their time on?
Hopefully not reading this thread
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:06:34 -0600 R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
| | Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | I've been going through the EBUILD list at random and providing
| | lists of things that need to be fixed before the ebuild
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Yeah, the lack of reopening powers is a problem. I'd rather this was
solved by a) letting any authenticated user reopen any bug and, if
necessary, b) allowing developers to lock bugs.
Agreed. I've requested this before but haven't had any response.
--de.
--
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:00:02PM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
WONTFIX refers to the bug, not the attached ebuild.
And it won't be 'fixed' unless the ebuild is improved, so WONTFIX is
fine.
Cheers,
Ferdy
--
\\|// . . . o o o o O O ( Born to be )
o o
Nathan L. Adams posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:31:30 -0400:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:03:18 -0400 Nathan L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| No, I'm saying that having a 'team lead' throw some arbitrary stamp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:00:02PM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
WONTFIX refers to the bug, not the attached ebuild.
And it won't be 'fixed' unless the ebuild is improved, so WONTFIX is
fine.
As R Hill already
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 19:23:23 -0400 Nathan L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| As R Hill already pointed out, WONTFIX means that the *bug* will never
| be fixed. Fixing the *ebuild* would fix the bug, so WONTFIX isn't the
| right keyword. Following your logic, all bugs dealing with ebuild
| should
Nathan L. Adams wrote:
As R Hill already pointed out, WONTFIX means that the *bug* will never
be fixed. Fixing the *ebuild* would fix the bug, so WONTFIX isn't the
right keyword. Following your logic, all bugs dealing with ebuild should
be marked WONTFIX; in the ebuild's current state the bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
Not to sound harsh, but...
[snip the we're just volanteers argument]
All F/OSS projects (even Linux with its numerous corporate sponsors)
are, at their core, volanteer projects. Yet the good ones still manage
to build peer review into
About a week ago, i sent a mail to this list saying that i lost my key
and posting a new one (AAC32A11). Now, i'm sending this email saying
that i revoked this new key, since i managed to get my original one.
Sorry for any inconvinience.
--
Carlos r3pek Silva
Gentoo Developer
Nathan L. Adams wrote:
[lenghty email snipped]
Since a ml isn't a place for interactive discussion, could you please
user our irc channel or jabber im?
Thank you
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:44:56PM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Barbato wrote:
Nathan L. Adams wrote:
Given every dev is complaining about how long is getting this thread and
how pointless is.
PLEASE AVOID REFRAINING SUCH NONSENSE
Rajat Gujral wrote:
Hi ,
I have downloaded image (Kernel-2.6.12-gentoo-r6) for x86 architecture
from the gentoo website and complied the gentoo kernel for pentium 3
processor (coppermine). But while emering portages for gentoo, after
compilation of KDE portage my computer hangs
22 matches
Mail list logo
