[gentoo-dev] cdparanoia and libcdio

2005-08-25 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Hi, Ok this was in mind for a bit of time and maybe now is the right moment to bring this up.. Cdparanoia [1] is a command line tool + libraries that allows to play cd audio. Currently cdparanoia seems to be dead upstream, and we have had couple of bugs before. It also doesn't work out of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] init.d-scripts don't see stuff from /etc/profile.env

2005-08-25 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 12:04, Roy Marples wrote: Um, that's kinda like behaviour by design unless anyone can tell me otherwise. /etc/env.d/* just set shell variables, so if you change one then you need to env-update source /etc/profile /etc/init.d/thisdaemon restart To refresh the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-embedded] Interactive command

2005-08-25 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 17:12, Jason Stubbs wrote: Wouldn't it better suit our needs to write a configuration program that packages can feed some custom configuration questions, and that then spits out something that can be used by the ebuilds. This would allow offline configuration of

Re: [gentoo-dev] future restrictions to DISTDIR access from the ebuild env

2005-08-25 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Thursday 25 August 2005 00:43, Brian Harring wrote: Hola all. robbat2 made the suggestion, and after a bit of playing I think it's best- in short, to support multiple DISTDIR's, we need either intelligent querying of portage from bash side as to a files true location, or a directory full

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package version requiring sse

2005-08-25 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 15:23, Martin Schlemmer wrote: Same thing (and probably better option) if you put it in pkg_setup() ... Isn't pkg_setup run too when just building a binary package (-B) (then the check shouldn't be performed), and just before installing a binary package? Paul --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: upgrade's and rc-scripts

2005-08-25 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Sunday 24 July 2005 15:25, Martin Schlemmer wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 18:40 -0500, Brian D. Harring wrote: On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:20:19AM +0200, Sven Köhler wrote: Apropos config-files: what about config-files that are provided by the old-version of an ebuild but have been moved

Re: [gentoo-dev] EBUILD_FORMAT support

2005-08-25 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 18:00, Brian Harring wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:20:16PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: To allow for this to work with current portage versions, perhaps it would be an option to introduce a new extension for .ebuild scripts that use it's functionality. That

Re: [gentoo-dev] future restrictions to DISTDIR access from the ebuild env

2005-08-25 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:05:11PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: Why not create that directory in the /var/tmp/portage/package/ directory. It would also safeguard against packages using files that they did not request. Maybe in the future a similar thing could be done for patches (when

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package version requiring sse

2005-08-25 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:41:00PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: On Wednesday 24 August 2005 15:23, Martin Schlemmer wrote: Same thing (and probably better option) if you put it in pkg_setup() ... Isn't pkg_setup run too when just building a binary package (-B) (then the check shouldn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] future restrictions to DISTDIR access from the ebuild env

2005-08-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 25 August 2005 11:33 am, Brian Harring wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:05:11PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: Why not create that directory in the /var/tmp/portage/package/ directory. It would also safeguard against packages using files that they did not request. Maybe in the

[gentoo-dev] cdparanoia and libcdio

2005-08-25 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Hi, Ok this was in mind for a bit of time and maybe now is the right moment to bring this up.. Cdparanoia [1] is a command line tool + libraries that allows to play cd audio. Currently cdparanoia seems to be dead upstream, and we have had couple of bugs before. It also doesn't work out of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package version requiring sse

2005-08-25 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Thursday 25 August 2005 17:29, Brian Harring wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:41:00PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: On Wednesday 24 August 2005 15:23, Martin Schlemmer wrote: Same thing (and probably better option) if you put it in pkg_setup() ... Isn't pkg_setup run too when just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package version requiring sse

2005-08-25 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 13:41 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: On Wednesday 24 August 2005 15:23, Martin Schlemmer wrote: Same thing (and probably better option) if you put it in pkg_setup() ... Isn't pkg_setup run too when just building a binary package (-B) (then the check shouldn't be

[gentoo-dev] win4lin-sources

2005-08-25 Thread Nick Rout
am i right in saying this package has disappeared quite recently? I am not sure when I previously updated eix, but I just did so now and win4lin-sources have gone. Some guy on g-user was asking and i was just trying to help him out. is there a reason for this? -- Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] win4lin-sources

2005-08-25 Thread Jonathan Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick Rout wrote: am i right in saying this package has disappeared quite recently? http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/sys-kernel/win4lin-sources/ Removing win4lin-sources; in need of maintainer due to security issues... - -- smithj

Re: [gentoo-dev] win4lin-sources

2005-08-25 Thread Nick Rout
sorry forget that, bugs.g.o had a sorta answer. cheers. On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:29:11 +1200 Nick Rout wrote: is there a reason for this? -- Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] gtk/gtk2 USE flag annoyances

2005-08-25 Thread Doug Goldstein
So I know this one has been a sore spot and an annoyance and since I don't feel like copying my blog post here I'm just going to link to it. I have a solution, one that I know has been brought up before but I'm willing to defend it and actually take action. Rather then just talk. So let's agree