Mike Frysinger wrote:
As far as devrel goes, call me a traditionalist but I think while infra
should be able to do emergency deactivations (and afaik nobody's ever
said they shouldn't) devrel should continue to be responsible for
disciplinary issues including repeated QA violations reported by
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 03:29 +, John N. Laliberte wrote:
Hello all,
The GNOME herd is now ready for 2.12.0 to be tested.
The gnome-2.12.0.ebuild should hit the mirrors shortly. ( just committed)
Please see this document for information on how to test:
Tentative Agenda for Thursday's meeting :
1. Official confirmation that the council is inline with
the already-defined roles of devrel and QA and its commitment
to make already-approved GLEPs (including GLEP 31) respected
(Clarification of position asked by many people including
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Tentative Agenda for Thursday's meeting :
If I forgot anything (that was put on the agenda by 1900 UTC yesterday)
please let me know.
Where are we meeting again? :) Same place as before?
--
Lance Albertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 15:52, Daniel Drake wrote:
Frank Schafer wrote:
Does someone know if it's worth a try with the vanilla and if vanilla
here means a really vanilla from kernel.org or if it's sufficient to
get the (too patched and thus not so vanilla) vanilla-sources.
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 16:28, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
The db.eclass maintains shared info by all db3 and db4 versions such that
/usr/include/db.h and /usr/lib/db.so allways point to the most recent
version of db installed.
Thus breaking Gentoo/FreeBSD as db.h there is something else, ehm
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 16:47, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 16:28, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
The db.eclass maintains shared info by all db3 and db4 versions such
that /usr/include/db.h and /usr/lib/db.so allways point to the most
recent version of db
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:42:43 +0200 Thierry Carrez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Before debating if the QA team should have more power to enforce,
| let's just have a proper QA project. Apparently not much devs want to
| do QA, not sure telling them they will do QA+police will help in
| motivating
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 17:01, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I'll look at fixing it. Is it only db.h or is there a problem
with /usr/lib/libdb.so too?
Just db.h, there's no libdb.so in FreeBSD's base system.
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò
Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:38:04PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:42:43 +0200 Thierry Carrez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Before debating if the QA team should have more power to enforce,
| let's just have a proper QA project. Apparently not much devs want to
| do QA, not
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 05:55:42PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
No. GuideXML URLs utterly suck. They're impossible to memorise and the
second I changed anything every link would become invalid.
But at least the layout is consistent, the location is official, concurrent
development is possible
Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:06:13AM -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
I'm not an ebuild dev so I may not know enough about this situation to
competantly comment on it but it seems to me that QA should have some
sort of limited ability to temporarily take away write access to the
Hi all.
We have two new developers from Poland.
Krzysiek Pawlik (nelchael) is going to help with the influx of
desktop-misc bugs. I'll let Krzysiek introduce himself:
I want to help maintain my distribution of choice. I've been helping
for some time, reporting bugs, posting patches and ebuilds.
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 07:45 pm, Curtis Napier wrote:
Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:06:13AM -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
I'm not an ebuild dev so I may not know enough about this situation to
competantly comment on it but it seems to me that QA should have some
sort of
Jon Portnoy wrote:
Sounds to me more like people who aren't familiar with the internal
structure of Gentoo don't need to be the peanut gallery when it comes to
internal structural issues, but that's just me 8)
It sounds to me like those 'more familiar with the internal structure
Gentoo'
15 matches
Mail list logo
