-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robb Romans wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Thank you for the opportunity to contribute to Gentoo for the time
| I have been here.
|
| Other tasks have recently prevented me from devoting adequate time
| to Gentoo. Rather than do a poor job, I feel it would be
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 00:03 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
For this reason I'd like to ask the retirement by scratch of GLEP22.. hope
you'll let me do that without having to write a GLEP that removes a GLEP
(it's recursive...)
Wouldn't it make more sense to get with the GLEP authors
hi. any way to change the form on this page to handle GET instead of
POST ?
that way we could bookmark searches.
thanks.
On Oct 2, 2005, at 11:47 PM, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12916
Hey Everyone,
This is like a bit too late, but I thought I'd post it
anyway. My sincere apologies for the delayed post.
Since the year 2001, the Linux Bangalore[1] conference, held every year
in Bangalore, India, has been the most anticipated Free Open Source
Software (FOSS) event of
As the subject says, another package that's flying away.
media-tv/xawdecode was superseded by media-tv/xdtv (same code, different name,
upstream renamed it).
Two weeks from now I'll remove media-tv/xawdecode from tree, if nobody is
going to disagree, I'm masking it now for this.
Every user of
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 20:29 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
media-tv/xawdecode was superseded by media-tv/xdtv (same code, different
name,
upstream renamed it).
Just curious, but why didn't you just use a package move?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 15:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 07 October 2005 03:30 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 20:29 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
media-tv/xawdecode was superseded by media-tv/xdtv (same code, different
name, upstream renamed it).
On Friday 07 October 2005 22:00, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I meant when they changed the name, why not just do a package move to
the new name? Nevermind. I must be being dense again.
Because it got into portage as a completely new package, as it was a new major
version, and I avoided porting
On Tuesday 27 of September 2005 10:31 Jan Kundrát wrote:
What should be changed, Handbook or profiles?
Any progress on this subject?
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth
pgpiunsPox2Er.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 21:22 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
We've discussed adding this to metadata.xml a few times in the past,
but every time there was opposition from a vocal minority of one who
claimed that USE flags should always do exactly the same thing for
every
Hi,
I wanted to try out the new and fabled TurboGears and found that it uses
the new python software distribution tool setuptools and is distributed
as python eggs. I can easily install it with setuptools/easy_setup, but
I wanted to make an ebuild for TurboGears, which is not just so with
Hello,
I am a frequenter of #gentoo-*, as many of you know :)
Tonight, hanging out in #gentoo, I observed a huge amount of incorrect
information once again.. tonight about profiles, cascading and all
that jazz, which to be honest is fairly undocumented. I decided to
give a miniclass on how it
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Hello,
I am a frequenter of #gentoo-*, as many of you know :)
Tonight, hanging out in #gentoo, I observed a huge amount of incorrect
information once again.. tonight about profiles, cascading and all
that jazz, which to be honest is fairly undocumented. I decided to
give a
R Hill wrote:
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Hello,
I am a frequenter of #gentoo-*, as many of you know :)
Tonight, hanging out in #gentoo, I observed a huge amount of incorrect
information once again.. tonight about profiles, cascading and all
that jazz, which to be honest is fairly undocumented.
Anyone got a good reason bug 38618 shouldn't go in?
Essentially it's
./configure ...
-${EXTRA_ECONF} $@
+$@ ${EXTRA_ECONF}
It allows for users to override ebuild defined configure options,
potentially shooting themselves in the foot, but in the same token
they can already shoot themselves in
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:03 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
It allows for users to override ebuild defined configure options,
potentially shooting themselves in the foot, but in the same token
they can already shoot themselves in the foot via EXTRA_ECONF...
Since EXTRA_ECONF is all about letting
16 matches
Mail list logo
