there's not much work in p2p right now - i've already fixed most bugsand these, which are opened are mainly requests for new packages and
versions bumps, but as i've written - maintaining so many packages isjust to much for one person...PS: i won't recruit new developers (well i even can't yet
Hello!
Tomcat 5.5 is out since a year now and still didn't make it into portage.
It doesn't even depend on JDK 1.5.0 in a sense that there is a compat
tarball which makes it work with JDK 1.4 so why isn't there a tomcat-5.5
ebuild in portage? Is there some reason for this?
Regards,
Szabolcs
--
RUMI Szabolcs wrote:
Hello!
Tomcat 5.5 is out since a year now and still didn't make it into portage.
It doesn't even depend on JDK 1.5.0 in a sense that there is a compat
tarball which makes it work with JDK 1.4 so why isn't there a tomcat-5.5
ebuild in portage? Is there some reason for this?
Most likely because no one has added it, why do you ask?
On 10/12/05, Norguhtar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RUMI Szabolcs wrote:
Hello!
Tomcat 5.5 is out since a year now and still didn't make it into portage.
It doesn't even depend on JDK 1.5.0 in a sense that there is a compat
tarball
Chris Gianelloni wrote: [Tue Oct 11 2005, 04:10:28PM CDT]
I think the point is that they should match. It was also quite obvious
after the comments on the thread, that this is one of those things that
probably won't ever be solved by consensus. Is this not the exact thing
that the Council is
RUMI Szabolcs wrote:
Hello!
Tomcat 5.5 is out since a year now and still didn't make it into portage.
It doesn't even depend on JDK 1.5.0 in a sense that there is a compat
tarball which makes it work with JDK 1.4 so why isn't there a tomcat-5.5
ebuild in portage? Is there some reason for
Valerio daelli wrote:
there's not much work in p2p right now - i've already fixed most bugs
and these, which are opened are mainly requests for new packages and
versions bumps, but as i've written - maintaining so many packages is
just to much for one person...
PS: i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grant Goodyear wrote:
| Um, sort of? The council exists mainly to make cross-project decisions.
| I suppose that this issue counts, since it involves both the baselayout
| folks and the GDP, but the GDP doesn't really care which logger is
|
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:10:28PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
If the latter: hump the baselayout team.
What does baselayout have to do with this?
They're to blame for about everything.
Nah, my bad. Of course I meant those responsible for the profiles.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
--
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 01:36 pm, Petteri Räty wrote:
The java herd is heavily understaffed.
So how does one get involved? I'm a professional Java developer and a gentoo
enthusiast. I'd love to participate and it would seem my skills would be a
good fit here, especially since you have
Dave Nebinger wrote:
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 01:36 pm, Petteri Räty wrote:
The java herd is heavily understaffed.
So how does one get involved? I'm a professional Java developer and a gentoo
enthusiast. I'd love to participate and it would seem my skills would be a
good fit
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 15:37 -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote:
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 01:36 pm, Petteri Räty wrote:
The java herd is heavily understaffed.
So how does one get involved? I'm a professional Java developer and a gentoo
enthusiast. I'd love to participate and it would seem my
12.10.2005, 19:36:41, Petteri Räty wrote:
RUMI Szabolcs wrote:
Hello!
Tomcat 5.5 is out since a year now and still didn't make it into portage.
It doesn't even depend on JDK 1.5.0 in a sense that there is a compat
tarball which makes it work with JDK 1.4 so why isn't there a tomcat-5.5
Jakub Moc wrote:
That's what I've been getting for a couple of days:
svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/java/gentoo-java-experimental'
svn: PROPFIND of '/svn/java/gentoo-java-experimental': SSL negotiation
failed: SSL error: unknown protocol (https://gentooexperimental.org)
H?
Alle 16:36, martedì 11 ottobre 2005, José Carlos Cruz Costa ha scritto:
Well, there's enotice.
However I think this has a broader scope, as many operations are replicated on
different package merges, from notifying the user to regenerating system
files (see docbook dtd's, info nodes,
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 18:35 +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:10:28PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
If the latter: hump the baselayout team.
What does baselayout have to do with this?
They're to blame for about everything.
That's ok, we have thick skin.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:56:38PM +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
Brian Harring ha scritto:
Rather then keep posting large patches here, just going to post them
to dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/portage/2.0 ... for example,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 05:15:15PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 02:10 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
Either way, test, feeding stats back, etc, would be appreciated ;)
Thanks,
Hokay... so experimental-6 seems to be at least mostly stable now, no
tracebacks, no --metadata
18 matches
Mail list logo
