On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:58:51 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to solve http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109079. I
> asked on #gentoo-dev and ciaramn said that we do not have a policy on
> where to make a home directory. So I would now like the input of other
> deve
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 22:58 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> I am trying to solve http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109079. I
> asked on #gentoo-dev and ciaramn said that we do not have a policy on
> where to make a home directory. So I would now like the input of other
> developers on howto solve
Petteri Räty wrote: [Tue Oct 18 2005, 03:39:04PM EDT]
> Maybe there should also be a mention in gwn next week and the change
> would then be committed on for example next tuesday.
It's already done. The ebuilds still honor USE=browserplugin but they
give a warning. Also the flag is marked as
I am trying to solve http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109079. I
asked on #gentoo-dev and ciaramn said that we do not have a policy on
where to make a home directory. So I would now like the input of other
developers on howto solve this bug.
Regards,
Petteri Räty (Betelgeuse)
signature.asc
Aron Griffis wrote:
> Thomas Matthijs wrote:[Tue Oct 18 2005, 10:46:15AM EDT]
>
>>You have the java herd's blessing to go ahead and change it.
>>Please announce it to gentoo-java@ aswell when you make the change.
>
>
> All set. The only place browserplugin is mentioned is in the
> Chang
Thomas Matthijs wrote: [Tue Oct 18 2005, 10:46:15AM EDT]
> You have the java herd's blessing to go ahead and change it.
> Please announce it to gentoo-java@ aswell when you make the change.
All set. The only place browserplugin is mentioned is in the
ChangeLogs.
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
G
Thomas Matthijs wrote:
> * Aron Griffis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>>Back in July the Java team proposed fixing its ebuilds to respect the
>>USE=browserplugin instead of USE=mozilla, a worthwhile change. During
>>the course of the discussion, it became clear that the existing
>>USE=nsplugin
Thomas Matthijs wrote: [Tue Oct 18 2005, 10:46:15AM EDT]
We had discussed it prior and then nobody seemed to object to
browserplugin, only after we changed it.
Actually that's not true.
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg02898.html
You see that karltk said he would be
2005/10/17, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 15:06 +0800, Shuduo Sang wrote:
> > I want to know is there any way to install a gentoo to an embedded system?
> > For example, ipaq. Because those samll devices do not have enough effort to
> > build a system from stage1. B
* Aron Griffis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Back in July the Java team proposed fixing its ebuilds to respect the
> USE=browserplugin instead of USE=mozilla, a worthwhile change. During
> the course of the discussion, it became clear that the existing
> USE=nsplugin was more appropriate.
>
> h
Alle 16:06, lunedì 17 ottobre 2005, Francesco R. ha scritto:
> mysql-4.1.14 has been added to the tree on 29 Aug 2005, should be
> time to stabilize the 4.1 branch of mysql.
has been reported on GWN, thanks gui
[snip]
>
> If no one is versus I'll stabilize 4.1.14 for "x86" and "amd64"
> tomorrow
Mike Frysinger wrote:
anyone care if i move the lua USE flag to global scope ? noticed it was still
local when bumping swig ...
www-servers/lighttpd:lua - Use lua for mod_cml
Has my blessing.
--
I know not how I came into this, shall I call it a dying life or a
living death?
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:52:05PM +0200, dju` wrote:
> Probably a silly question, but why choose nsplugin over browserplugin?
> Aren't there any package that might provide plugins for
> non-netscape-based browsers?
Yes, that's the exact reason for chosing nsplugin over browserplugin:
the latter
13 matches
Mail list logo
