On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 23:55 +0100, Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:25:57PM +0100, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
Yo, Welcome Tobias!
Oh no, not another Tobias!
Isn't it a beautiful name? :P
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Hi,
there has been a lengthy discussion on bugzilla ([1]), about the best
packaging method for the gnat Ada compiler. The outcome seems to be that
gnat will still have its own ebuild in the future and not be part of the
GCC ebuild. It also has a mention that gcj will
You don't have to care, Alin. Mips is not among the security-wise supported¹
architectures.
Then only problem I see in general is, that every single subproject defines
what is supported and the information is scattered on the different
gentoo.org documentation pages (release, security,
On Sunday 08 January 2006 01:38, Brian Harring wrote:
Asking people to focus on cleaning the tree? Sure. Generate a list
of candidates would help. Blocking new packages? No...
I can't say I did not expect negative replies and generating a list of
candidates is at least a suggestion. But a
On Sunday 08 January 2006 01:35, Stuart Herbert wrote:
I agree that some cleaning is needed (and some of my packages are
desperate for it!), but I'm totally opposed to this idea. I think the
idea of shutting up shop for three months (presumably with a closed
for refurbishment sign on the
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 18:11 -0500, Olivier Crete wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-01 at 09:39 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:05:49AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:00 +, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 06/01/06, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 17:32 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
snip a bunch about binpkg
I think a key thing that is missing is build info that is only kept on
the installed system. If we were to ever create a build server setup, we
need to be able to have multiple binpkg's of the same version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2006 01:35, Stuart Herbert wrote:
As Donnie already pointed out, I did not mean version bumps, but only new
packages. How about this idea: Everyone who adds a new package, has to check
and fix an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Muraco wrote:
| Another thing that I don't like, is the feel of this method does seem
| offical enough.. mostly because portage is not 'stable'-aware, Its
| just using a stripped down tree.
What do you want then? If an entire standalone tree
On Sunday 08 January 2006 15:01, Brian Harring wrote:
Guessing you missed the previous flame war about how trying to force
people to do something doesn't actually work?
When it's not common sense, that every dev is supposed to do a minimal on
general QA, Gentoo has a problem.
You're assuming
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 17:32 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
snip a bunch about binpkg
I think a key thing that is missing is build info that is only kept on
the installed system. If we were to ever create a build server setup, we
need to be able to have multiple binpkg's
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:55:50AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
A few rough ideas that just popped in my
head is either packing all of these versions into one tarball (not even
sure if thats feasible)
Ugly, binpkgs are bzip2ed tarballs + xpak at the end of the bzip2
stream, jamming multiple
Okay let's forget the flames and talk about something related to practical
development today :)
As people reading my blog might already know, I've been experimenting with
--as-needed LDFLAG in the past days. It seems pretty stable when you don't
have GNOME installed (as many libraries from
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
GDP might be the place where to put them, but as they are mainly
developer-oriented, they might be better accessed directly by devs (at least
for the first steps until they are drafts).
What people think about this?
Hi,
The minutes of the Web-Apps Herd's January meeting are now available
[1], including a full log if anyone needs it.
It was a busy meeting, with 12 separate agenda items delt with. We
elected project leads, agreed who would deal with a number of
problematic ebuilds, and started looking at
Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:07:48PM +, Renat Lumpau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
GDP might be the place where to put them, but as they are mainly
developer-oriented, they might be better accessed directly by devs (at
Luis Medinas wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 10:31 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:07:48PM +, Renat Lumpau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
GDP might be the place where to put them, but as they are mainly
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
Devwiki is effectively inaccesable to non gentoo folks (whether in
access, or in navigating the beast), thus it's a no go.
Any docs generated should be googable imo.
We could start a public wiki displaying all herds and
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 13:31 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
Indeed it's GDP area but to expose project goals, status and low level
docs isn't even related with GDP. We can't maintain the high level of
docs like GDP does and it's not even your goal. I think the public wiki
idea will improve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lance Albertson wrote:
Luis Medinas wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
snip snip
I had thought about creating some kind of a site like this, but not
necessarily in a wiki form. I don't like the idea of letting
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
We could start a public wiki displaying all herds and projects. It would
be great to add some low level docs, herds/project goals, ideas and so.
Even the users could be allowed to edit and share information.
Anything like that will
Background, to make life easyer for people that use more versions of
mysql (and just for fun) MySQL is going to be slotted.
Currently the slot enabled versions are mysql-4.1.16-r30
mysql-5.0.18-r30 mysql-5.1.4_alpha-r30, in short those with -r30.
The few patches needed are already included in
Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
Luca Barbato wrote:
I'm thinking about adding the srvdir[1] global useflag.
Scream if I miss some discussion preventing it.
(fenice[2] will use it, that's why I'm adding it)
lu
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0020.html#implementation
[2]
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:59:40 +0100
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I originally thought of putting it on my devspace, but using GuideXML
there is a bit tricky, at least for me (as xsltproc seems to refuse
working on the pure xml directly).
So I was thinking if we had a way
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:30:16PM +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
We could start a public wiki displaying all herds and projects. It would
be great to add some low level docs, herds/project goals, ideas and so.
Even the users could
Francesco Riosa wrote:
Background, to make life easyer for people that use more versions of
mysql (and just for fun) MySQL is going to be slotted.
Currently the slot enabled versions are mysql-4.1.16-r30
mysql-5.0.18-r30 mysql-5.1.4_alpha-r30, in short those with -r30.
The few patches
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13973 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
Got this on Jan 8th.
---BeginMessage---
From carpaski Sun Jan 8 10:44:39 2006
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from zarquon.twobit.net [217.160.252.91]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-6.2.5.2)
for [EMAIL
28 matches
Mail list logo
