Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13973 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Background, to make life easyer for people that use more versions of
> mysql (and just for fun) MySQL is going to be slotted.
>
> Currently the slot enabled versions are mysql-4.1.16-r30
> mysql-5.0.18-r30 mysql-5.1.4_alpha-r30, in short those with "-r30".
>
> The few pat
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:44:22 +
Renat Lumpau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> www-apps/phpmp has been package masked and will be removed from the
> tree in about a week. It is being superseded by www-apps/phpmp2.
> Please post comments to http://bugs.gentoo.org/74951
In the future, if you are goin
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:30:16PM +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> > > We could start a public wiki displaying all herds and projects. It would
> > > be great to add some low level docs, herds/project goals, ideas and so.
> > > Even the use
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:59:40 +0100
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I originally thought of putting it on my devspace, but using GuideXML
> there is a bit tricky, at least for me (as xsltproc seems to refuse
> working on the pure xml directly).
>
> So I was thinking if we h
Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
Luca Barbato wrote:
I'm thinking about adding the srvdir[1] global useflag.
Scream if I miss some discussion preventing it.
(fenice[2] will use it, that's why I'm adding it)
lu
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0020.html#implementation
[2] http://packages.g
Background, to make life easyer for people that use more versions of
mysql (and just for fun) MySQL is going to be slotted.
Currently the slot enabled versions are mysql-4.1.16-r30
mysql-5.0.18-r30 mysql-5.1.4_alpha-r30, in short those with "-r30".
The few patches needed are already included in c
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> > We could start a public wiki displaying all herds and projects. It would
> > be great to add some low level docs, herds/project goals, ideas and so.
> > Even the users could be allowed to edit and share information.
>
> Anything like th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lance Albertson wrote:
> Luis Medinas wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>
> I had thought about creating some kind of a site like this, but not
> necessarily in a wiki form. I don't like the idea of letting user
On Sunday 08 January 2006 19:07, Renat Lumpau wrote:
> Devwiki
i thought of devwiki when I started writing Gentoo/Alt documentation. I then
discarded the idea for a series of reason, the first of which is the one
already stated by Brian, that the docs results unreadable by non-devs, and
also not
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 13:31 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> > Indeed it's GDP area but to expose project goals, status and low level
> > docs isn't even related with GDP. We can't maintain the high level of
> > docs like GDP does and it's not even your goal. I think the public wiki
> > idea will im
Luis Medinas wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
>
Devwiki is effectively inaccesable to non gentoo folks (whether in
access, or in navigating the beast), thus it's a no go.
Any docs generated should be googable imo.
>>>
>>>
>>>We could start a publ
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> >>Devwiki is effectively inaccesable to non gentoo folks (whether in
> >>access, or in navigating the beast), thus it's a no go.
> >>
> >>Any docs generated should be googable imo.
> >
> >
> > We could start a public wiki displaying all
Luis Medinas wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 10:31 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
>
>>On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:07:48PM +, Renat Lumpau wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
>>>
GDP might be the place where to put them, but as they are mainly
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:07:48PM +, Renat Lumpau wrote:
>
>>On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
>>
>>>GDP might be the place where to put them, but as they are mainly
>>>developer-oriented, they might be better accessed directly
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 10:31 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:07:48PM +, Renat Lumpau wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> > > GDP might be the place where to put them, but as they are mainly
> > > developer-oriented, th
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:07:48PM +, Renat Lumpau wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> > GDP might be the place where to put them, but as they are mainly
> > developer-oriented, they might be better accessed directly by devs (at
> > least
> >
Hi,
The minutes of the Web-Apps Herd's January meeting are now available
[1], including a full log if anyone needs it.
It was a busy meeting, with 12 separate agenda items delt with. We
elected project leads, agreed who would deal with a number of
problematic ebuilds, and started looking at esta
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> GDP might be the place where to put them, but as they are mainly
> developer-oriented, they might be better accessed directly by devs (at least
> for the first steps until they are drafts).
>
> What people think about t
Okay let's forget the flames and talk about something related to practical
development today :)
As people reading my blog might already know, I've been experimenting with
--as-needed LDFLAG in the past days. It seems pretty stable when you don't
have GNOME installed (as many libraries from GNOM
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:55:50AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>>A few rough ideas that just popped in my
>>head is either packing all of these versions into one tarball (not even
>>sure if thats feasible)
>>, or creating a hashed suffix based upon the
>>useflags enab
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:55:50AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> A few rough ideas that just popped in my
> head is either packing all of these versions into one tarball (not even
> sure if thats feasible)
Ugly, binpkgs are bzip2ed tarballs + xpak at the end of the bzip2
stream, jamming multipl
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 17:32 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>I think a key thing that is missing is build info that is only kept on
>>the installed system. If we were to ever create a build server setup, we
>>need to be able to have multiple binpkg's of the same ve
Brian Harring wrote:
> It's not an issue.
Okay, if it will just somehow show up when using the --ask option, I'll
be happy :).
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Luca Barbato wrote:
> I'm thinking about adding the srvdir[1] global useflag.
>
> Scream if I miss some discussion preventing it.
>
> (fenice[2] will use it, that's why I'm adding it)
>
> lu
>
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0020.html#implementation
> [2] http://packages.gentoo.or
On Sunday 08 January 2006 15:01, Brian Harring wrote:
> Guessing you missed the previous flame war about how trying to force
> people to do something doesn't actually work?
When it's not common sense, that every dev is supposed to do a minimal on
general QA, Gentoo has a problem.
> You're assumi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Muraco wrote:
| Another thing that I don't like, is the feel of this method does seem
| "offical" enough.. mostly because portage is not 'stable'-aware, Its
| just using a stripped down tree.
What do you want then? If an entire standalone tree
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 14:40 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > If you feel so strongly about this, why not setup a "cleaning crew"
> > project that goes around doing exactly this?
>
> Don't you think that it is pretty much barefaced to let a small group do the
> dirty, boring and annoying work, whi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Sunday 08 January 2006 01:35, Stuart Herbert wrote:
>
>
>
> As Donnie already pointed out, I did not mean version bumps, but only new
> packages. How about this idea: Everyone who adds a new package, has to check
> and f
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 17:32 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>
> I think a key thing that is missing is build info that is only kept on
> the installed system. If we were to ever create a build server setup, we
> need to be able to have multiple binpkg's of the same version depending
> on differen
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 18:11 -0500, Olivier Crete wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-01 at 09:39 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:05:49AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:00 +, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> > > > On 06/01/06, Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:40:47PM +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Sunday 08 January 2006 01:35, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > I agree that some cleaning is needed (and some of my packages are
> > desperate for it!), but I'm totally opposed to this idea. I think the
> > idea of shutting up shop for
On Sunday 08 January 2006 01:35, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> I agree that some cleaning is needed (and some of my packages are
> desperate for it!), but I'm totally opposed to this idea. I think the
> idea of shutting up shop for three months (presumably with a "closed
> for refurbishment" sign on the
On Sunday 08 January 2006 01:38, Brian Harring wrote:
> Asking people to focus on cleaning the tree? Sure. Generate a list
> of candidates would help. Blocking new packages? No...
I can't say I did not expect negative replies and "generating a list of
candidates" is at least a suggestion. But
You don't have to care, Alin. Mips is not among the security-wise supported¹
architectures.
Then only problem I see in general is, that every single subproject defines
what is supported and the information is scattered on the different
gentoo.org documentation pages (release, security, kernel,.
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Hi,
there has been a lengthy discussion on bugzilla ([1]), about the best
packaging method for the gnat Ada compiler. The outcome seems to be that
gnat will still have its own ebuild in the future and not be part of the
GCC ebuild. It also has a mention that gcj will eve
Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
Yes, thes examples are quite good, however as I said before, real (=working)
examples weere needed.
(note to /me => `emerge -s livecd && emerge -a livecd-specs livecd-kconfigs`)
Working specs can be found in our ViewCVS in gentoo/src/releng/specs. Therein
are containe
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 23:55 +0100, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:25:57PM +0100, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> > Yo, Welcome Tobias!
>
> Oh no, not another Tobias!
Isn't it a beautiful name? :P
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
38 matches
Mail list logo
