On Thursday 09 February 2006 15:00, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 03:04:08PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Time again for one of those mails; this time from me. Due to time
> > constraints,
> > real life and coming close to burning out I'm stepping down as relea
On Thursday 09 February 2006 20:23, Jason Stubbs wrote:
...
Wrong list :/
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Nothing in the meta - would whoever is currently considering themselves
to be maintainer pop into bug 115861? I don't want to be misled by the
last dev who did a bump to think they might be the same person as the
maintainer ;)
~mcummings
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mess
From: Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rsnapshot and cp bug
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.devel
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 08:54:02 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[This message was posted some time ago but failed to show on the list
I've resubscribed so hope it goes thru now
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:08:45AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> From: Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: rsnapshot and cp bug
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.devel
> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 08:54:02 -0600
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [This message was posted some time a
Bryan "=?utf8?Q?=C3=98stergaard?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> The portage version of rsnapshot 1.2.1 (most recent) has a problem
>> with the newest gnu cp. It can cause rsnapshot to eat all your
>> carefully saved backups. This was discussed on rsnapshot list some
>> time ago:
>>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:23:27AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Please file a bug on https://bugs.gentoo.org so I can fix this. No, I
> > don't accept bug reports on gentoo-dev ML :)
>
> Will do but I wanted this to be posted because anyone running
> rsnapshot might lose some backups. What hap
Bryan "=?utf8?Q?=C3=98stergaard?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please file a bug on https://bugs.gentoo.org so I can fix this. No, I
> don't accept bug reports on gentoo-dev ML :)
I'd do this for sure but the bugzilla setup won't let me login. I had
to create an account since I've never used b
Harry Putnam wrote:
> At any rate attempting to log in with the supplied passwd and real
> name fails ...
Use e-mail.
--
Krzysiek Pawlik key id: 0xBC51
desktop-misc, desktop-dock, x86, java...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The proces never asked me for a uid when creating account. It just
> asked for my real name and email. So after receiving the passwd I'm
> not sure what it wants for uid but guessing the `real' name it asked
> for is it... it was not so stated though.
>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:44:06AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> At any rate attempting to log in with the supplied passwd and real
> name fails ...
Use the supplied email adress as login.
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
pgpLkVg
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:44:06AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Bryan "=?utf8?Q?=C3=98stergaard?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Please file a bug on https://bugs.gentoo.org so I can fix this. No, I
> > don't accept bug reports on gentoo-dev ML :)
>
> I'd do this for sure but the bugzilla set
A final note on this:
The report is filed however I have done an emerge -v -uD world
since I had this problem. I uninstalled rsnapshot before the
update. (This was a few days ago)
Got the sources for version 1.2.2 built, installed and am using it.
(version 1,2,2 does NOT have that problem)
Hi,
I have some questions.
- Does portage use ccache transparently for ebuilds using scons?
- Do I need to patch the SConstruct file to use ccache?
- Does portage use ccache independently from the buildsystem used?
thx
Frieder
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Scott Stoddard wrote:
> Thanks kloeri, blubb, metalgod, and everyone else I've talked to in the
> past couple of days. I'll do my best to keep up the standards. (and by
> jebus ciaranm, I'll use repoman!)
"If everyone were like you, I'd be out of business!" (repoman)
Welcome to the team!
--
Sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi users, developers and not-so-innocent bystanders,
effective a few days ago, we have entered a winterly package freeze for
all packages maintained by the Java Team. No new Java packages will be
put in the tree unless they fix serious issues or secu
Present:
azarah (Martin Schlemmer)
Koon (Thierry Carrez)
Swift (Sven Vermeulen)
agriffis (Aron Griffis)
seemant (Seemant Kulleen)
solar (Ned Ludd)
vapier (Mike Frysinger)
Agenda:
* GLEP 44 - Manifest2 format
Outcome:
* Council members were generally in agreement that GLEP 44 is a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions.
- Does portage use ccache transparently for ebuilds using scons?
- Do I need to patch the SConstruct file to use ccache?
- Does portage use ccache independently from the buildsystem used?
I don't think it can work transparently for scons, be
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions.
- Does portage use ccache transparently for ebuilds using scons?
- Do I need to patch the SConstruct file to use ccache?
- Does portage use ccache independently from the buildsystem used?
I don't think it can work tra
Please find attached GLEP 47: "Creating 'safe' environment variables".
The GLEP is a Gentoo/Alt initiative. Constructive comments are welcome.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo/Alt
GLEP: 47
Title: Creating 'safe' environment variables
Version: $Revision: 1.1 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2006/02/09 21:42:57 $
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:25:43 -0500 Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Outcome:
I've committed the amendment to GLEP 39 (council) as discussed. It
should show up on the web within an hour or three. If I or docutils
screwed it up, someone please let me know.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Devel
Version 1.0 of eselect, the modular configuration framework, is now
out. All changes since 1.0_rc2 have been bugfixes.
We haven't split out some of the "shipped with eselect but not core
functionality" modules in this release, since I didn't want to break
anything horribly -- that will probably be
* Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Agenda:
> * GLEP 44 - Manifest2 format
>
> Outcome:
> * Council members were generally in agreement that GLEP 44 is a good
>idea, but without genone present to answer questions, the council
>was unwilling to approve or deny it. Postponed to next meet
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:48:32 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Please find attached GLEP 47: "Creating 'safe' environment variables".
> Author: Diego Pettenò, Fabian Groffen
> <{flameeyes,[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Could you use the standard format please?
> Status: Active
Should be Draft
On Friday 10 February 2006 00:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Provision should be made for future ports that require more than two
> keywords. There's no particular reason to artificially limit this to
> two at this stage.
There's a reason: simplicity. More than two part keywords simply are difficult
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:11:00 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Friday 10 February 2006 00:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > Provision should be made for future ports that require more than two
| > keywords. There's no particular reason to artificially limit this to
| >
Grobian wrote:
> Please find attached GLEP 47: "Creating 'safe' environment variables".
>
> The GLEP is a Gentoo/Alt initiative. Constructive comments are welcome.
>
>
> The variables ``ELIBC``, ``KERNEL`` and ``ARCH`` are currently set in
> the profiles when other than their defaults for a GN
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:26:11 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Assuming the CHOST variable is 'safe' is not a good thing, users can
| over-ride this variable. Can you specify some behavior when it's set
| to something bogus ( invalid form ) or something thats not in the
| mapping?
Us
On Friday 10 February 2006 01:26, Alec Warner wrote:
> Assuming the CHOST variable is 'safe' is not a good thing, users can
> over-ride this variable. Can you specify some behavior when it's set to
> something bogus ( invalid form ) or something thats not in the mapping?
Changing CHOST variable in
On Friday 10 February 2006 01:20, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Mmm. Do you consider the cost of slightly simplified wording in the
> GLEP now to be worth extra effort that may be required in the future by
> some especially whacked out port? I'd prefer to see at least a note in
> the GLEP stating that t
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 00:21 +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
> * Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Agenda:
> > * GLEP 44 - Manifest2 format
> >
> > Outcome:
> > * Council members were generally in agreement that GLEP 44 is a good
> >idea, but without genone present to answer questions, the co
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:05:35 -0500 Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| The words AUXFILE EBUILD MISCFILE DISTFILE could be using shorter
| names such as AUX EBD MSC DST like the existing vdb CONTENTS
| files does for objects dirs and symlinks.
Would be interesting to see a comparison made betwee
On Thursday 09 February 2006 22:05, Ned Ludd wrote:
> I would like to see it drop the tab handling for indicating newlines
> and just use a real newlines when we want a newline.
>
> While having the tabs makes it easier for people to read it increases
> the byte size and adds some undesired complex
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:48:32 +0100
Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please find attached GLEP 47: "Creating 'safe' environment variables".
Could you add a definition of 'safe' to the GLEP? It's not clear what
this means at the moment.
--
Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
34 matches
Mail list logo
