[gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-18 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
In December last year Savannah changed their CVS from anonymous SSH to pserver, causing quite a few of our live CVS ebuilds to need changes. Back then, I opened bug #115327 listing the offending ebuilds and mostly all, except the GNUStep ebuilds, have now been updated for this change. However, si

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-18 Thread Mark Loeser
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > In December last year Savannah changed their CVS from anonymous SSH to > pserver, causing quite a few of our live CVS ebuilds to need changes. > > Back then, I opened bug #115327 listing the offending ebuilds and > mostly all, except the GNUStep ebu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-18 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote: > A lot of ebuilds probably fall under this category, and we should figure > out how we want to handle all of them. I say mask the GNUStep stuff for a > month or two, put something on staffing-needs saying we need someone to > maintain t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:53:09 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Back then, I opened bug #115327 listing the offending ebuilds and | mostly all, except the GNUStep ebuilds, have now been updated for this | change. Are they all in package.mask? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Deve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-18 Thread Fabian Borschel
Hi Devs, On 2006-03-18 12:53:09 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: However, since the GNUStep herd is void, no one has stepped up to fix those ebuilds - meaning we have a bunch of useless, non-functional, live CVS ebuilds laying around in portage, see the list below. Did

[gentoo-dev] [Last Rites] NVU

2006-03-18 Thread Jory A. Pratt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As most are aware nvu has not had any activity in almost a year. Unless someone steps up or has any valid reason we should continue to patch nvu to keep it in the tree please speak up. If noone has any complaints I will p.mask Wed. March 21 and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Last Rites] NVU

2006-03-18 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:13:29 -0600 "Jory A. Pratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If > noone has any complaints I will p.mask Wed. March 21 and remove 30 > days later. Do you mean Wednesday, or March 21st? Or were you planning on masking it next year? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list