Zac Medico wrote:
> What is the best way to propagate information about these two
> variable types? For example, we can have a list of variable names
> stored in a new variable called "COLON_SEPARATED" that will reside
> in either the profiles or /etc/env.d/ itself. Variable names not
> listed in
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:32:50PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> We are planning to add git.eclass as presented in bug #132383 (as
> attachment 96300). I also attach it here in case someone wants to
> comment parts of it.
git.eclass is now in the tree
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. P
On 9/8/06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After sending this mail, I'll be removing myself from the metadata of
dev-util/confcache ; I've tried maintaining the ebuild and supporting
confcache usage in Gentoo, but I'm unable to proceed with this task.
I'll take it back.
Be
Am Montag, 11. September 2006 03:44 schrieb Zac Medico:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Portage currently has two hard-coded lists of variables that control
> the behavior of env-update.
The same applies to eselect env.
> I'd like to make these variables
> configurable so that package maintainers have direct
On 9/9/06, Christel Dahlskjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen no
progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and unless
someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be removed in 30
days.
Why didn't you escalat
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Christel Dahlskjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen no
>> progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and unless
>> someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be removed in 30
On 9/11/06, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uhm, web-apps has been CCed on the bug since the beginning. Last time I
asked, noone wanted to touch the FUBARed ebuild, IIRC. :)
The package was masked without Christel (on behalf of QA) posting an
advance warning of their actions. That's not t
On 9/10/06, Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
upstream for that reason
Upstream sucks badly here.
us because we haven't a tool like the one BaSS wrote for the ebooks.
Such a tool would deal with many modules, but not all of them. Some
modules require additional dep
Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 9/11/06, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uhm, web-apps has been CCed on the bug since the beginning. Last time I
asked, noone wanted to touch the FUBARed ebuild, IIRC. :)
The package was masked without Christel (on behalf of QA) posting an
advance warning of their
Here's the "master ballot" for the election. Confirmation e-mails will
follow.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
- confirmation 2b94 -
vapier kloeri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Am Montag, 11. September 2006 03:44 schrieb Zac Medico:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Portage currently has two hard-coded lists of variables that control
>> the behavior of env-update.
> The same applies to eselect env.
>
>> I'd like t
Running "countify" on the master ballot yields the following results
for the new council:
vapier
kloeri
wolf31o2
Flameeyes
KingTaco
robbat2
Kugelfang
These results are unofficial because under some circumstances "countify"
has been known to fail. The signature of such
I'd best give the full ranking for completeness (and for independent
verifications):
result: option vapier wins
result: option kloeri wins
result: option wolf31o2 wins
result: option Flameeyes wins
result: option KingTaco wins
result: option robbat2 wins
result: option Kugelfang wins
result: optio
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 11:01 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > On 9/11/06, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Uhm, web-apps has been CCed on the bug since the beginning. Last time I
> >> asked, noone wanted to touch the FUBARed ebuild, IIRC. :)
> >
> > The package was mas
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 21:25 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen no
> progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and unless
> someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be removed in 30
> days.
Er, as someon
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:01:02 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Stuart Herbert wrote:
| > On 9/11/06, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >> Uhm, web-apps has been CCed on the bug since the beginning. Last
| >> time I asked, noone wanted to touch the FUBARed ebuild, IIRC. :)
| >
| >
I'd like to send my unofficial congratulations to the new council then.
Also thanks to the folks who did the technical stuff behind the vote.
Btw, how many people actually voted?
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org
Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org
On 11/09/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:01:02 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Stuart Herbert wrote:
| > On 9/11/06, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >> Uhm, web-apps has been CCed on the bug since the beginning. Last
| >> time I asked, n
Zac Medico wrote:
> We can store them in /etc/env.d/ itself. The env-update tool could
> be hare coded to consider COLON_SEPARATED and SPACE_SEPARATED as
> being implicitly within the SPACE_SEPARATED class. The tool would
> make one pass to accumulate those two variables, and then another
> pass
Wernfried Haas wrote: [Mon Sep 11 2006, 11:23:03AM CDT]
> I'd like to send my unofficial congratulations to the new council then.
> Also thanks to the folks who did the technical stuff behind the vote.
>
> Btw, how many people actually voted?
121
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:27:39 -0500 Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Here's the "master ballot" for the election. Confirmation e-mails
| will follow.
And here're the graphs that you've all come to know and love, showing
once again that Condorcet is a brilliant system for picking out peo
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:01:02 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Stuart Herbert wrote:
| > On 9/11/06, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >> Uhm, web-apps has been CCed on the bug since the beginning. Last
| >> time I asked, noone wanted to touch the FUBARed
Thanks to fmccor, we now have additional confirmation of the results
using STV, with a minor wrinkle:
My results agree. I showed a difference in the 7th position
(jaervosz for Kugelelfang), but on closer examination, I see that
this comes about because of a tie vote. I.e., I show a s
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:44:23 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Portage currently has two hard-coded lists of variables that control
| the behavior of env-update.
I realise GLEP 24 is considered not going very far, but in the
interests of what *has* been done on it... Is it worth contin
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:27:39 -0500 Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Here's the "master ballot" for the election. Confirmation e-mails
> | will follow.
>
> And here're the graphs that you've all come to know and love, showing
> once again that Condorcet is a
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:59:46 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > And here're the graphs that you've all come to know and love,
| > showing once again that Condorcet is a brilliant system for picking
| > out people who aren't unpopular rather than people who are popular.
|
| Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
>> We can store them in /etc/env.d/ itself. The env-update tool could
>> be hare coded to consider COLON_SEPARATED and SPACE_SEPARATED as
>> being implicitly within the SPACE_SEPARATED class. The tool would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:44:23 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Portage currently has two hard-coded lists of variables that control
> | the behavior of env-update.
>
> I realise GLEP 24 is considered not going
On Monday 11 September 2006 14:07, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> I have new ebuilds for drupal, and a number of modules (I think I got
> up to 'f') locally. I'll get them into the webapps overlay, so that
> folks can test them, and help out.
I'm more than happy for you to take Drupal instead of me :)
H
On Monday 11 September 2006 03:44, Zac Medico wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Portage currently has two hard-coded lists of variables that control
> the behavior of env-update. I'd like to make these variables
> configurable so that package maintainers have direct control over
> them. The variables bre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Monday 11 September 2006 03:44, Zac Medico wrote:
>> What is the best way to propagate information about these two
>> variable types? For example, we can have a list of variable names
>> stored in a new variable called "COLO
On 9/11/06, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm more than happy for you to take Drupal instead of me :)
However, is there any reason that the main drupal ebuild cannot stay in
portage?
No reason at all, that I know of.
Drupal's a package I can't really work on; I work for a company that
A while back it was agreed that it would be a good idea to standardise
certain aspects of package manager behaviour. We thought it'd be a good
idea to start with something easy so that we can iron out any kinks in
the process... So...
Attached is a first draft of an attempt at standardising how
co
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Now why does it not surprise me that you of all people are encouraging
> people to complain about Christel? Is there something you'd like to get
> out in the open?
>
I've been watching you spew for a while. When are you going to get ov
Congratulations to the new council. I hope for a lot of progress this
year outta you guys :)
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Trustee, Gentoo Foundation
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 11 September 2006 15:22, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> * Otherwise, try again with ``._cfg0001_name``, then ``._cfg0002_name`` and
> so on (base ten is used for the number part) until a usable filename is
> found.
For what purpose are the older cfg[number]_name files kept around? I ask
be
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:02:53 -0700 Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Monday 11 September 2006 15:22, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > * Otherwise, try again with ``._cfg0001_name``, then
| > ``._cfg0002_name`` and so on (base ten is used for the number part)
| > until a usable filename is found
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:02:53PM -0700, Chris White wrote:
> On Monday 11 September 2006 15:22, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > * Otherwise, try again with ``._cfg0001_name``, then ``._cfg0002_name`` and
> > so on (base ten is used for the number part) until a usable filename is
> > found.
> For wha
Hi,
Just had an irc-talk with allanonjl and I'm now co-maintaining gimp.
I want to remove old gimp 1.2 soon (a bunch of bugs could be closed and we
could get rid of that symlink-hack for the bins). If you have any objections,
cry now (but expect that I want you to maintain that stuff if you cry)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> * If no existing file with the intended target name exists, or if the existing
> file has identical content to the file to be installed, the file to be
> installed
> is installed as normal.
Just one poor dev's opinion, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Böck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just had an irc-talk with allanonjl and I'm now co-maintaining gimp.
> I want to remove old gimp 1.2 soon (a bunch of bugs could be closed and we
> could get rid of that symlink-hack for the bins). If you have any objectio
Am Dienstag, 12. September 2006 02:46 schrieb Michael Cummings:
> Looks like that will break media-gfx/frontline (=media-gfx/gimp-1.2*)
> and gimp-freetype-0.2-r3 (also =media-gfx/gimp-1.2*).
frontline is dead upstream, has no metadata and last changelog-entry is about
a year old, so I suspect th
Below are all of the community member offers and developer requests made
in the last 7 days. As always, the full list of offers and requests can
be found on our project page
http://gentoo.org/proj/en/userrel/adopt-a-dev/index.xml
-Thomas
Community Member Offers
===
Alec Warner wrote:
> Stuart Herbert wrote:
>> On 9/11/06, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Uhm, web-apps has been CCed on the bug since the beginning. Last time I
>>> asked, noone wanted to touch the FUBARed ebuild, IIRC. :)
>>
>> The package was masked without Christel (on behalf of QA) po
Lance Albertson wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>> Stuart Herbert wrote:
>>> On 9/11/06, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uhm, web-apps has been CCed on the bug since the beginning. Last time I
asked, noone wanted to touch the FUBARed ebuild, IIRC. :)
>>> The package was masked without Ch
45 matches
Mail list logo
