On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:46:58 +0100
Hanno Böck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the correct way to handle this? I'd suggest that enewuser might get
some force-parameter that tells it to delete and recreate the user if it
already exists. Thoughts?
Tell the user to do it manually in
First and foremost: thanks for the work!
On 17-01-2008 13:47:28 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
overlays.gentoo.org [3]:
- Moving between machines
- Git service is already on the new machine
- Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn://
- Trac being replaced [2]
Footnotes:
1. You do
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
First and foremost: thanks for the work!
On 17-01-2008 13:47:28 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
overlays.gentoo.org [3]:
- Moving between machines
- Git service is already on the new machine
- Anonymous SVN is changing from
On 18-01-2008 01:21:21 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
If a transition period would be available, I could make Portage
alarm users to fix the SYNC variable to reflect the new URL. I also
need to add/fix/change Portage's support for this new URL scheme.
You're syncing directly from overlays
On Friday 18 January 2008, Marius Mauch wrote:
Hanno Böck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the correct way to handle this? I'd suggest that enewuser might
get some force-parameter that tells it to delete and recreate the user
if it already exists. Thoughts?
Tell the user to do it manually
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 06:41 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
right, there is no way (by design) to force these settings on an already
created user. if the old path really truly should not be the old value, you
can do something like this in pkg_setup:
if [[ $(egetent passwd user | cut -d: -f6)
On 18-01-2008 03:32:36 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
The problem is that emerge --sync obfuscates that SVN is being used
underneath. Some (most?) users will not have a clue they are using SVN.
How about rolling out a prefix-portage update that just kicks them into
updating it?
That's
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, anonsvn, anongit
- Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn:// [1]
overlays.gentoo.org [3]:
- Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn://
i'd point out that http:// syncing is usable from behind
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:46:28AM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 18-01-2008 01:21:21 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
If a transition period would be available, I could make Portage
alarm users to fix the SYNC variable to reflect the new URL. I also
need to add/fix/change Portage's
Joe Peterson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:56:36AM +, Steve Long wrote:
Ryan Hill wrote:
I agree, though year of birth might be interesting. Income and children
are a bit too private.
++ in general although I do think parenthood (if responsible) is as
relevant as age. A 28 year
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:56:36AM +, Steve Long wrote:
Ryan Hill wrote:
I agree, though year of birth might be interesting. Income and
children are a bit too private.
++ in general although I do think parenthood (if responsible) is as
relevant as age. A 28
I totally agree with not asking such personal questions which really
are not going to help the foundation, what we need to ask are
questions that relate to the distribution, it's developers user
community as a whole. one question regarding children that I see as
being appropriate is:
Do children
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto a écrit :
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Daniel Ostrow wrote:
| As I am no longer an ebuild dev (real life job got in the way) I
| have a whole slew of hardware that I'm willing to ship to any
| gentoo dev for the cost of shipping
Steve Long wrote:
Joe Peterson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:56:36AM +, Steve Long wrote:
Ryan Hill wrote:
I agree, though year of birth might be interesting. Income and children
are a bit too private.
++ in general although I do think parenthood (if responsible) is as
relevant as
Steve Long wrote:
My apologies if I caused you any offense, Joe. I fully agree that choosing
not to have children is just as mature as deciding to procreate, and more
mature than simply drifting into parenthood.
No offense taken, and I agree about the drifting into thing. My
wife's brother
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2. Trac doesn't scale well enough, as users of the existing overlay
machine have noted performance problems before. Being replaced with
ViewVC and as yet undecided which Wiki application.
Am I right that Wiki content is not migrated?
V-Li
--
Christian
On 1/19/08, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I understand correctly, the performance of svn under apache is
better than the svnserver
The other way round.
We are talking about read-only anonymous repository, right?
But I will take your word for it :)
Thanks!
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 12:26:44AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 1/18/08, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, anonsvn, anongit
- Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn:// [1]
On 1/19/08, Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My core concern with the SVN http://, was the crappy performance it
provided compared to svn://. The main rsync tree has never been
available for iterative syncing via http://, just had tarball snapshots
and deltas instead.
If I understand
Stefan de Konink [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
How stupid anyone could be that stores anything in /tmp. I think it is a
problem to change the default behavior of a system that in essence will
result in data loss.
I think this might just be a communication problem. You seem to be
contradicting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
I joined this mailinglist because of my concern pointed in:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206604
How stupid anyone could be that stores anything in /tmp. I think it is a
problem to change the default behavior of a system that in
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 06:41:44PM +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
2. Trac doesn't scale well enough, as users of the existing overlay
machine have noted performance problems before. Being replaced with
ViewVC and as yet undecided which Wiki application.
Am I right that Wiki content is
Your suggestions are ideal and don't get to personal, thanks for the
feedback and corrections.
On Jan 18, 2008 8:54 PM, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
likewhoa [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:20:08 -0500:
one question regarding children
On Fri, January 18, 2008 1:43 pm, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto a écrit :
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Daniel Ostrow wrote:
| As I am no longer an ebuild dev (real life job got in the way) I
| have a whole slew of hardware that I'm
On 1/18/08, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, anonsvn, anongit
- Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn:// [1]
overlays.gentoo.org [3]:
- Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn://
i'd
likewhoa [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:20:08 -0500:
one question regarding children that I see as being appropriate is:
Do children in your household use Gentoo?
Yes
No
It's to complicated for them
Prefer not to answer
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 01:01:04AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 1/19/08, Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My core concern with the SVN http://, was the crappy performance it
provided compared to svn://. The main rsync tree has never been
available for iterative syncing via
27 matches
Mail list logo
