Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
Doug Klima schrieb:
2) ESVN_OFFLINE which disables svn up.
Isn't this a bit of a hack? The point is for it to run svn up. Now
I've added support in a local refactor that I had started today that
if the working copy's revision matches the requested revision, that no
svn
On Saturday 16 February 2008 00:40:31 Doug Klima wrote:
> > For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of
> > subversion.eclass in the kde overlay. During that time we have added the
> > following features to the eclass which we would like to put back in
> > gentoo-x86 soon. Since th
Doug Klima schrieb:
>> 2) ESVN_OFFLINE which disables svn up.
>
> Isn't this a bit of a hack? The point is for it to run svn up. Now
> I've added support in a local refactor that I had started today that
> if the working copy's revision matches the requested revision, that no
> svn up is performed.
Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
> On 23:39 Fri 15 Feb , Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
>> For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of
>> subversion.eclass
>> in the kde overlay. During that time we have added the following
>> features to
>> the eclass which we would like to put back in gentoo-
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of subversion.eclass
in the kde overlay. During that time we have added the following features to
the eclass which we would like to put back in gentoo-x86 soon. Since the
changes are fairly extensive we decided
On 23:39 Fri 15 Feb , Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of
> subversion.eclass
> in the kde overlay. During that time we have added the following features to
> the eclass which we would like to put back in gentoo-x86 soon. Since the
> chan
For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of subversion.eclass
in the kde overlay. During that time we have added the following features to
the eclass which we would like to put back in gentoo-x86 soon. Since the
changes are fairly extensive we decided to send it to this list for
Howdy all,
We need to agree upon some syntax which we can mark an eclass as
deprecated and potentially point to a replacement or multiple replacements.
Discuss.
--
Doug
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
"Paul de Vrieze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:26:57 +1100:
> djvu: support DjVu, a PDF-like document format esp. suited for scanned
> documents
Looks just about perfect, here. =8^) In contrast, the previous proposal
may be more technical
# Gunnar Wrobel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (14 Feb 2008)
# Outdated package. See
# https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209030
www-apps/disc-cover
# Gunnar Wrobel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (14 Feb 2008)
# Broken and outdated package. See
# https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209029
www-apps/bugs-bug-gen
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well if you're going for a widely-known acronym outside Gentoo-land it'd be
> decss: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCSS
>
> I've always wondered why that wasn't used in the first place (not that it
> helps now; just found css odd for the same reason as othe
11 matches
Mail list logo
