Doug Klima wrote:
Doug Klima wrote:
Doug Klima wrote:
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of
subversion.eclass in the kde overlay. During that time we have
added the following features to the eclass which we would like to
put back in
Doug Klima wrote:
Doug Klima wrote:
Doug Klima wrote:
Doug Klima wrote:
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of
subversion.eclass in the kde overlay. During that time we have
added the following features to the eclass which we would like to
William L. Thomson Jr. a écrit :
Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
support. amd64 as a keyword seems a bit odd and off maybe.
I think we'd already discussed this a while back, and decided not to
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
support. amd64 as a keyword seems a bit odd and off maybe.
What's the
On 20-02-2008 19:23:26 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
support. amd64 as a
Hi gentooists,
I've been reading news sites about some changes happening in Gentoo
and I thought it might be a good time to submit some ideas I've been
baking for several years.
I come from a Linux From Scratch background, I like the feeling of
knowing every single corner of my system and the
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless the work to do that is greater than the value of the change.
It most likely is. And beside of that: amd64 is the technically correct
term. :p
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Christoph Mende wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless the work to do that is greater than the value of the change.
It most likely is. And beside of that: amd64 is the technically correct
term. :p
*sigh* I know I'm going to regret
On 04:07 Thu 21 Feb , Rajiv Aaron Manglani (rajiv) wrote:
1.1 net-misc/asterisk-addons/asterisk-addons-1.2.8.ebuild
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-misc/asterisk-addons/asterisk-addons-1.2.8.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
plain:
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 19:42 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
But I agree, rekeywording amd64 to x86_64 would probably be more work than
it's
worth.
Can we not just hardwire an alias into the emerge codebase?
I must admit, from a purely optical standpoint, the idea of saying my
system is amd64 when
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 16:27 +1100, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 19:42 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
But I agree, rekeywording amd64 to x86_64 would probably be more work than
it's
worth.
Can we not just hardwire an alias into the emerge codebase?
I must admit, from a purely
11 matches
Mail list logo
