Hi,
"Santiago M. Mola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Christian Faulhammer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What we propose is proper testing and keywording by anyone
> > around...not just team members.
>
> Writing test plans like emacs team does really helps too. I
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò):
> In the past two years we had quite a few applications from students
> that were already full-fledged Gentoo developers. I sincerely would
> like that this year we put as a rule that Gentoo developers cannot
> partecipate in Summer of Code as stu
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-03-02 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
sys-apps/mii-diag 2008-02-25 10:44:35 armin76
sys-devel/distcc-config 2008-02-25 18:11:37 armin76
media-sound/jmax
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) writes:
> In the past two years we had quite a few applications from students that
> were already full-fledged Gentoo developers. I sincerely would like that
> this year we put as a rule that Gentoo developers cannot partecipate in
> Summer of Code as
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:57:03PM +0100, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> On Sunday, 02. March 2008 20:25:09 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > > Do we inspire them by telling them that anybody who has made this
> > > choice in the past is not to be rewarded financially for doing so?
> > This brings up
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your entire argument is based on the assumption that the Summer of
> Code program's primary goal is to recruit new developers for Open
> Source projects. While this is one goal I am unsure if holding it
> above the others is necessary.
I know it's not
On 3/2/08, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/08, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I know this is going to stir up quite some discussion, but I do think
> > it's worth trying requesting it at least.
> >
> > In the past two years we had quite a few ap
On 3/2/08, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know this is going to stir up quite some discussion, but I do think
> it's worth trying requesting it at least.
>
> In the past two years we had quite a few applications from students that
> were already full-fledged Gentoo d
On Sunday, 02. March 2008 20:25:09 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > Do we inspire them by telling them that anybody who has made this
> > choice in the past is not to be rewarded financially for doing so?
> This brings up a different point of view too.
From my point of view it's pretty simple
Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we inspire them by telling them that anybody who has made this choice
> in the past is not to be rewarded financially for doing so?
This brings up a different point of view too. Why should just somebody
be rewarded financially and not someone else?
Thilo Bangert wrote:
> it's not just what you "sincerely think"! I most certainly think, you have
> a valid point.
>
> from http://code.google.com/soc/2008/faqs.html#0.1_goals:
>
And yet from the same site:
7. Can students working on an open source project continue to work on it
as part of Goo
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 04:47:28PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote:
> In the past two years we had quite a few applications from students that
> were already full-fledged Gentoo developers. I sincerely would like that
> this year we put as a rule that Gentoo developers cannot partecipate in
> But I
> sincerely think the main goal of Summer of Code is to allow new people
> to enter the scene of Free Software, to understand how Free Software
> projects work and so on.
it's not just what you "sincerely think"! I most certainly think, you have
a valid point.
from http://code.google.
> peper told me he'd wrap up a few bugs and make a release this week after
> I was about to go touching eselect all over when we know my C/C++ is
> better then my bash.
won't have time till next week ;/ need to finish uni projects and exams.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sdfsdafsdfaf
sdfdfdfdff
Spanky, your date is here.
--
fonts,by design, by neglect
gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect
wxwindows @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sdfsdafsdfaf
sdfdfdfdff
Go sparc!
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
sdfsdafsdfafsdfdfdfdff
joshua jackson wrote:
All,
Google is once again doing the summer of code for students. I'm helping
organize it this year and am putting out a call for some elements to help.
1) We need idea's for things to do. Diego has already submitted some via
his blog which have been taken into consideratio
I know this is going to stir up quite some discussion, but I do think
it's worth trying requesting it at least.
In the past two years we had quite a few applications from students that
were already full-fledged Gentoo developers. I sincerely would like that
this year we put as a rule that Gentoo
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
> Duncan schrieb:
> > Bernd Steinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> >
> > > What about the timezone?
> > > Baselayout had a setting for the timezone in /etc/conf.d/clock.
> > > baselayout-2.0.0
> > > + openrc doesn't seem to have that. Not needed?
> > >
> >
> > No
Iain Buchanan wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 14:28 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> He has been breaking the tree for a while now but as Calchan has been
>> having availability problems I get to insult him a little bit later than
>> usual. Bo hails from Aalborg, Denmark. He studies to become a con
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>> Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
>> | Wouldn't it be more clean if it is amd64 just like the Linux one?
>> | Because the arch basically is the same. I think that
>> | amd64(-linux) -- x86_64-fbsd
>> | x86(-linux) -- x86-fbsd
>> |
>> | would be more confusing t
Richard Freeman wrote:
We might also aim to make it easy for users to mix-and-match levels of
stability by package. I know it is possible already, but perhaps it
could be improved, or pre-canned lists of packages that users might
typically want bleeding-edge vs stable could be compiled.
Tusnam
George Shapovalov wrote:
> The good thing about this approach is that it only requires an initial
> investment of organizing and automating things but does not add any regular
> work to the devs. In fact, if the "tested" category becomes popular enough,
> it can cut the work for stable testers,
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What we propose is proper testing and keywording by anyone
> around...not just team members.
>
Writing test plans like emacs team does really helps too. I waste too
much time figuring out how to test properly so
Sunday, 2. March 2008, Steve Dibb Ви написали:
> Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > What we propose is proper testing and keywording by anyone
> > around...not just team members.
>
> I agree... our main problem is manpower -- people actually working on
> the stable bugs. I've tried to do it myself a
26 matches
Mail list logo
