Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:30:00 +0100:
> Raúl Porcel wrote:
>> Xulrunner-1.9 is a big change, and the apps using it won't work until
>> they are fixed. So this needs to be decided, i've been working on
>> slotting xulrunner,
On 3/16/08, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:51:12 +0100
> Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Not if COPYING file is inside $DOCS and is installed in the loop.
>
>
> Doing something like this would work as well (and go equally unnoticed):
>
> local
# Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16 Mar 2008)
# Mask for removal on 16 Apr 2008
# upstream unresponsive, replaced by dev-util/ftjam
# Bug #173703
dev-util/jam
--
fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
mips, treecleaner,for a fact or just fo
Dawid Węgliński kirjoitti:
Sunday, 16 of March 2008 23:58:45 Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On P, 2008-03-16 at 23:29 +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:51:12 +0100
Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not if COPYING file is inside $DOCS and is installed in the loop.
Doing somet
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-03-16 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
x11-misc/ASFiles2008-03-10 12:17:16 voyageur
app-portage/gatt-svn2008-03-11 18:39:22 opfer
x11-plugins/gkrel
On 22:31 Sun 16 Mar , Stefan Briesenick (sbriesen) wrote:
> 1.1 media-video/qdvdauthor/qdvdauthor-1.0.0.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-video/qdvdauthor/qdvdauthor-1.0.0.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org
Sunday, 16 of March 2008 23:58:45 Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On P, 2008-03-16 at 23:29 +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:51:12 +0100
> >
> > Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Not if COPYING file is inside $DOCS and is installed in the loop.
> >
> > Doing something l
On P, 2008-03-16 at 23:29 +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:51:12 +0100
> Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Not if COPYING file is inside $DOCS and is installed in the loop.
>
> Doing something like this would work as well (and go equally unnoticed):
>
> local
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:51:12 +0100
Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not if COPYING file is inside $DOCS and is installed in the loop.
Doing something like this would work as well (and go equally unnoticed):
local DOCS="foo bar COPYING baz"
dodoc ${DOCS}
Using a loop in the ebuild wo
Sunday, 16 of March 2008 21:10:12 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2008-03-16 20:39:50 Rémi Cardona napisał(a):
> > Christian Faulhammer a écrit :
> > > Don't install COPYING.
> >
> > Could repoman have a QA warning for COPYING inside DOCS="" and dodoc ?
>
> Repoman already has such QA
2008-03-16 20:39:50 Rémi Cardona napisał(a):
> Christian Faulhammer a écrit :
> > Don't install COPYING.
>
> Could repoman have a QA warning for COPYING inside DOCS="" and dodoc ?
Repoman already has such QA warning in case of dodoc:
RepoMan scours the neighborhood...
ebuild.minorsyn
Christian Faulhammer a écrit :
Don't install COPYING.
Could repoman have a QA warning for COPYING inside DOCS="" and dodoc ?
Cheers,
Rémi
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:00:36 +0100
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Markus Meier (maekke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > DOCS="AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog NEWS README"
>
> Don't install COPYING.
fixed.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
"Markus Meier (maekke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> DOCS="AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog NEWS README"
Don't install COPYING.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
http://www.faulhammer.org/>
signature.asc
Description: P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I'm a newcomer to Gentoo and never heard of Sabayon (great project
btw). Knowing no one here or there, nor any history:
great never heard project... Smells troll or dumb fan.
This conversation reminds me of Human Resources. They always have
'procedures' and 'ca
Natanael Copa wrote:
IIRC thread starter complained about too many wrong RDEPEND.
No, the thread started with an attitude problem, still unsolved btw.
Problem is not that devs are not willing to fix. Problem is that its to
easy to inject wrong RDEPEND in the tree in the first place and only w
16 matches
Mail list logo