Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Andrew D Kirch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Looks like you counted the number of files in the files/
subdirectories. Not all of these are patches. Also, you probably
forgot to count seds, as some of us use sed more
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Here's the script that I used to generate this.
Just some bash hints. In a nutshell: please don't use ls in scripts.
I have not manually
reviewed all of thousands of patches to determine the unique situation
of each patch, however I would like a suggestion on how to
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:33:04 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a distribution we should strive to make as many packages available
with as many features as possible on as many architectures (or indeed
operating systems) as possible.[1] Not communicating important changes
in ebuilds to
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:13:26 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the benefit?
There is none really. Allow all use flags to exist in metadata.xml.
It's really more of a clarification to the GLEP if this is allowed.
I personally think that this would facilitate a lot of
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would
each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the
channel name, and that they are the contact for any problems/troubles.
Hi,
I've written a status report¹ about portage py3k conversion. It tells
about the current state, what needs to be done etc.
I'll be updating the page so people can learn about the current status.
¹: http://dev.gentoo.org/~hawking/portage-2to3/status.xml
--
Regards,
Ali Polatel
What's the best way to send patches for the patches ;) ?
For example in
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hawking/portage-2to3/auto/11-portage-2to3-map.patch
- there is the following hunk:
hunk
diff --git a/pym/portage/process.py b/pym/portage/process.py
index f766d30..dc425af 100644
---
René 'Necoro' Neumann yazmış:
What's the best way to send patches for the patches ;) ?
In this particular case you shouldn't send patches for patches, so it's
not a problem, see below ;)
snip
But the complete expression could be rewritten as:
return [int(fd) for fd in
2to3 gives a warning while converting portage codebase using map¹ fix:
RefactoringTool: Warnings/messages while refactoring:
RefactoringTool: ### In file ./pym/portage/dbapi/porttree.py ###
RefactoringTool: Line 266: You should use a for loop here
This is a valid warning because map() will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ali Polatel wrote:
2to3 gives a warning while converting portage codebase using map¹ fix:
RefactoringTool: Warnings/messages while refactoring:
RefactoringTool: ### In file ./pym/portage/dbapi/porttree.py ###
RefactoringTool: Line 266: You should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
But the complete expression could be rewritten as:
return [int(fd) for fd in os.listdir(/proc/%i/fd % os.getpid()) if
fd.isdigit()]
Applied, thanks.
- --
Thanks,
Zac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
11 matches
Mail list logo
