Mike Auty posted 49614bad.6040...@gentoo.org,
excerpted below, on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:52:13 +:
> Duncan wrote:
>> Amarok2 - dev-db/mysql-community - ld: /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqld.a
>> (client.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `client_errors' can not be
>> used when making a shared object;
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-01-04 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-misc/arpstar2009-01-01 13:12:33 dsd
sci-geosciences/marble 2009-01-02 20:22:51 cryos
media-gfx/icns2png
* "Patrick Lauer (patrick)" :
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/sleuthkit/sleuthkit-3.0.0.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/sleuthkit/sleuthkit-3.0.0.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
>
* "Patrick Lauer (patrick)" :
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/memdump/memdump-1.0.1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/memdump/memdump-1.0.1.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
>
> Index:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> Amarok2 - dev-db/mysql-community - ld: /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqld.a
> (client.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `client_errors' can not be
> used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
Well, I fixed this individual instan
Jeroen Roovers posted
20090104174353.22981...@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net, excerpted below, on Sun, 04
Jan 2009 17:43:53 +0100:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:52:11 +0100
> Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>
>> Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description
>> line (especially when bug wrang
Le 03/01/2009 18:57, Ulrich Mueller a écrit :
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Markus Meier wrote:
my proposals:
xft: Build with support for XFT font renderer (x11-libs/libXft)
+1
BTW, why do we have a virtual/xft? Is this a leftover from the times
of monolithic X?
I would say it was there for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Buchholz wrote:
> Accepting the fact that different teams have different preferences, we
> need to find a solution for them to set theirs individually. This could
> either be the order of elements in metadata.xml (and would set the
> preferen
On Sunday 04 January 2009, Mike Auty wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > The order ("first maintainer as assignee" or "first maintainer/herd
> > as assignee") is open to discussion and I think this is the proper
> > forum to have that discussion.
>
> It seems sensible to me. I would've thought that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> I spotted that too but didn't remember putting it in black and white. :)
>
> The order ("first maintainer as assignee" or "first maintainer/herd as
> assignee") is open to discussion and I think this is the proper forum to
> ha
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:02:21 +
Mike Auty wrote:
> According to [1], "When the file lists multiple entries, then you
> assign the bug to the first maintainer, and CC the other
> maintainer(s) and herd(s)." So it looks as though the file should go
> through the maintainers first and herds seco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Buchholz wrote:
> * Order in metadata.xml is what dictates assignee, i.e.: The first herd
> or maintainer listed in the metadata.xml of the first CAT or CAT/PN
> is who is assignee, all other follow as CC.
Great work, just wanted to double
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:18:38 +0530
"Nirbheek Chauhan" wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:34:18 +0530
> > "Nirbheek Chauhan" wrote:
> >> How about this:
> >
> > It's utterly useless. Unlike the existing shortcut forms, what
> > you're after
On Sunday 04 January 2009 16:48:38 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On the contrary, the reverse of what you say is true. A simple grep of
> the tree showed that:
In how many of those ebuilds would the long form be
use1? ( cat/pkg[use2] )
rather than
use1? ( cat/pkg[use2] ) !use1? ( cat/pkg )
?
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Now into it's Nth great year, I bring you the fourth edition of the
> automatic assignment proposal.
>
> Previously:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48485 [v1]
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/49601 [v2]
> ht
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:34:18 +0530
> "Nirbheek Chauhan" wrote:
>> How about this:
>
> It's utterly useless. Unlike the existing shortcut forms, what you're
> after isn't widely enough used to warrant its own shortcut. Use the
> expanded form
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:52:11 +0100
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description
> line (especially when bug wrangling), searching is made easier that
> way.
"Bug reports that refer to a single or a few (similar) packages
should det
Hi,
again month has passed and it is time for our "periodic" meeting.
We will hold this meeting on our irc channel (#gentoo-kde @irc.freenode.net).
Schedule will be that we try to start at 19:00 UTC on January 8th.
Previous meeting:
log - [1] | summary - [2]
Topics for current meeting:
- sumarize
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:34:18 +0530
"Nirbheek Chauhan" wrote:
> How about this:
>
> New syntaxExpanded syntax
> Extension of
>
> pkg[foo?bar] foo? ( cat/pkg
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> This is all nice but i had one issue which was like this:
> i have package with use foo and package2 with use bar
> and package with foo depend on package2 with bar.
>
> so this is not eapi2 incely handleable, what i would like to do is using
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:46:06 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> This is all nice but i had one issue which was like this:
> i have package with use foo and package2 with use bar
> and package with foo depend on package2 with bar.
>
> so this is not eapi2 incely handleable, what i would like to do is
> u
Dne neděle 04 Leden 2009 16:34:02 Nirbheek Chauhan napsal(a):
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Christian Faulhammer
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > regarding USE dependencies what is the correct way if a package needs
> > one out of two USE flags?
> >
> > || ( cat-egory/package[foo] cat-egory/package[bar
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> regarding USE dependencies what is the correct way if a package needs
> one out of two USE flags?
>
> || ( cat-egory/package[foo] cat-egory/package[bar] )
>
That's the way right now as per portage EAPI=2 doc[1]
> or is there s
Hi,
regarding USE dependencies what is the correct way if a package needs
one out of two USE flags?
|| ( cat-egory/package[foo] cat-egory/package[bar] )
or is there something else?
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
Hi,
Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description
line (especially when bug wrangling), searching is made easier that way.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
http://www.faulhammer.org/>
signat
25 matches
Mail list logo
