Re: [gentoo-dev] Using -frecord-gcc-switches

2009-03-03 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 03/03/2009 07:33, Donnie Berkholz a écrit : Thoughts? Could we do something useful with this? What about the various objects that make up the final lib/binary? How is this handled? Looks like a promising idea though Cheers, Rémi

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI stored in metadata.xml (was: Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives)

2009-03-03 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, sorry, if this post doubles some other posts already done by others...I wrote it during a journey and haven't catched yet with the discussion. Kumba ku...@gentoo.org: Kumba wrote: I was talking to Alec last night in -dev (yes, I'm still alive), and I tossed out the idea of using

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Overlay Layout support.

2009-03-03 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Caleb Cushing wrote: Are we to say that we shouldn't allow tools to have support for this. I think that it is a nature progression that if we are to allow overlays to extend the portage tree that we should allow overlays to extend other

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review - 2

2009-03-03 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 02/03/2009 в 13:01 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen пишет: On Monday 02 March 2009 08:24:35 Torsten Veller wrote: Could you just use dosed here? dosed needs to die. Why? -- Peter. signature.asc Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Overlay Layout support.

2009-03-03 Thread Petteri Räty
Caleb Cushing wrote: Are we to say that we shouldn't allow tools to have support for this. I think that it is a nature progression that if we are to allow overlays to extend the portage tree that we should allow overlays to extend other overlays. I probably shouldn't butt in... first,

[gentoo-dev] March KDE Team meeting.

2009-03-03 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, as usual there is again one month gone so we are going to have meeting. This time it will be on Thursday 5.3. at 19:00 UTC in #gentoo-kde. We have on our TODO for this meeting: - kde3 eapi2 and other kde3 stuff that needs to be done. - kde4.2 things we have to do for its stabilisation. -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review - 2

2009-03-03 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 12:13:34 Peter Volkov wrote: Could you just use dosed here? dosed needs to die. Why? Because it's utterly pointless and exists only for legacy reasons. Few packages use it anyway. -- Bo Andresen

[gentoo-dev] gems.eclass review

2009-03-03 Thread Alex Legler
Hey, we have some changes to be made in gems.eclass for Ruby 1.9.1. Basically this introduces the possibility to install gems for multiple versions of Ruby. If anyone feels like reviewing, please review the following changes: ;) http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.txt Diff against the

[gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-03 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, I am currently messing with git.eclass and i would like to see some other sets of eyes on it. I am throwing in full new eclass [1] and its diff [2]. I will be really happy for comments and even more for diffs :D [1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-4.0-r1 for ~arch

2009-03-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 02 March 2009 22:56:27 Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 19:27 Mon 02 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: unless i see any new issues come up, bash-4.0-r1 will be going into ~arch this week. now would be a good time to sync up and try bash-4.0 on your system :p. -mike comet $ source

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 21:01:36 Mart Raudsepp wrote: Please share your thoughts and ideas as a reply here there have been threads in the past about collecting all the random scripts that people use related to Gentoo. you might want to scrape those as well as the cvs dir that was set up to

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:01:36 +0200 Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm collecting ideas from the wider development and contributing community on how to help maintainers and contributors get work done quicker, or rephrased - how to get more done in the limited time we have. Something

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Olivier Crête
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:26 +0100, Peter Alfredsen wrote: On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:01:36 +0200 Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm collecting ideas from the wider development and contributing community on how to help maintainers and contributors get work done quicker, or rephrased -

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Josh Saddler
Olivier Crête wrote: Maybe we could use the dev wiki for that kind of stuff? Having a wiki.gentoo.org would be even better... There is, but it's uber-sekrit. Or so I was told some years ago. It may or may not (still) exist. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 03:26 Wed 04 Mar , Peter Alfredsen wrote: On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:01:36 +0200 Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm collecting ideas from the wider development and contributing community on how to help maintainers and contributors get work done quicker, or rephrased - how to get

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 21:24 Tue 03 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 03 March 2009 21:01:36 Mart Raudsepp wrote: Please share your thoughts and ideas as a reply here there have been threads in the past about collecting all the random scripts that people use related to Gentoo. you might want to

[gentoo-dev] Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support )

2009-03-03 Thread Caleb Cushing
I'd like to start with, I'm not trying to stir up trouble but since questions were asked i'll answer them. If you think neither should exist why do you have an opinion about this at all? I merged the java-overlay into regen2 a couple of weeks ago. as of right now I've no plans to support

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge prefers to install x11-libs/qt:4 instead of ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) even when x11-libs/qt-gui:4 is already installed

2009-03-03 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 02-03-2009 a las 13:01 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: || ( ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) x11-libs/qt:4 ) It's a variation of bug 161953 [1]. For this particular variation, at the moment I don't think there's a

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge prefers to install x11-libs/qt:4 instead of ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) even when x11-libs/qt-gui:4 is already installed

2009-03-03 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 03-03-2009 a las 11:25 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: You're right. It's easy to says it in words but if you tried to actually implementing you'd find that the PROPERTIES=virtual concept simplifies the problem a lot and makes it possible to optimally solve some cases of bug 141118 that