People I nominate:
* leio / mraudsepp, because he's done a really good job protecting the
distro's interests
* Cardoe, because he is working goal-oriented and doesn't care about the
wargharbling and instead goes for restults
* lu_zero, because he's done a good job and brings in his own ideas wi
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
And here we go, these are the ones I'd like to nominate:
* dev-zero, well because ... i'd like him to be on the council again!
* ulm because I think he's an excellent addition to the council
* amne, because I want him to stop slacking :P
that's it for now :)
wkr,
Tobias
Am Montag, den 01.06.
> glep55: See GLEP55. To summarize: The eapi is put into the file name so
> that the package manager knows the EAPI (and thus how to handle this
> file format). While it simplifies the eapi discovery this comes at a
> high price as there is no reliable way to find and validate all ebuilds.
i
I'd like to counter-nominate you since you do a really good job. :-P
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org
forum-mods (at) gentoo.org
#gentoo-forums (freenode)
pgp2DpnRWtMmS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I nominate:
ssuominen
armin76
Perhaps others later.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# Samuli Suominen (3 Aug 2008)
# Unmaintained. Masked for removal wrt #233394.
# Open security bugs #208566, #215006 and #231836.
media-video/mplayer-bin
Steve
I agree with patrick nominees expect one addition. I add patrick himself to
prove us that he can not only do benchmarks but to force us to do them :D
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
2009-06-01 07:30:01 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> I'd like to counter-nominate you
Aww... That must hurt.
Denis.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> People I nominate:
> * zmedico, because he has managed to beat portage into a really good shape and
> keeps adding features that make users happy
Thanks, but no thanks. I'm busy with other stuff.
- --
Thanks,
Zac
-BEGIN PGP
* Patrick Lauer :
> People I nominate:
>
> * tove, because he has done an awesome job keeping perl alive and has shown
> consistent sane opinions in technical discussions
Thanks, but I have to decline.
pgpCDmFKgCMJ9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> Hello people,
>
> as the discussion about glep55 has gone in circles long enough I decided to
> collect the various ideas presented around that theme complex and compare
> them in a way that might allow us to reach a sane decision.
>
> Since it has become quite a lot of text I've kept some parts
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> I really dont like the idea of changing the file extension in anyway since
> .ebuild is something that defines Gentoo. It is like changing .deb for Debian
> :P. Somethings must stay untouched.
++
Sentimental value ftw!
/me wears asbestos u
I knew I wasn't done. I also nominate:
arfrever
calchan
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
> wrote:
>> Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next
>> two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009).
>>
>
> I would like to kick-start the nominations by nominating Mart Raud
Thank you, Patrick and Tobias. I accept the nomination.
Ulrich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# Serkan Kaba (01 Jun 2009)
# Last-rited Bug #272117
# Hard depends on Java 1.4 (Bug #118291)
dev-java/adaptx
- --
Sincerely,
Serkan KABA
Gentoo Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozi
Today I have tried to merge openswan-2.4-14 into my ~x86 system. The
compilation failed because of a name clash:
cc -I. -I/home/ta/tmp/openswan-2.4.14.orig/linux/net/ipsec
-I/home/ta/tmp/openswan-2.4.14.orig/linux/include
-I/home/ta/tmp/openswan-2.4.14.orig -DDEBUG -DWITH_UDPFROMTO
-DHAVE_IP_
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply rep
On Monday 01 of June 2009 22:10:47 Timur Aydin wrote:
> Today I have tried to merge openswan-2.4-14 into my ~x86 system. The
> compilation failed because of a name clash:
>
Hi Timur.
Mind to report this issue on bugs.gentoo.org with patch attached there? Also
don't forget to check if the bug was
The people I'd like to nominate:
- dertobi123 ... for his solid comments, experience, common sense,
reliability
- halcy0n ... even though he had to resign early I hope he finds time
again to run for council, I really enjoy working together with him and I
appreciate his common sense
- betelgeuse ..
On Fri, 29 May 2009 19:17:03 +0200
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> Most of GLEP 23 features have already been implemented in portage.
> Some since
> a long time (at least in stable portage) like multiple licenses and
> conditional
> licenses. License group and ACCEPT_LICENSE is already implemented in
> po
Hi,
A lot of what I've seen in these past few months is a lot of
bickering and disagreement over glep 55. I don't think that has to
be. A glep shouldn't be political but should evolve as people bring
up points to change and refine it. I haven't seen that been
happening, so I'd
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 20:55 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2009.05.27 13:46, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 20:57 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd &
> >
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 12:17 +0200 schrieb Tobias Scherbaum:
> And here we go, these are the ones I'd like to nominate:
>
> * dev-zero, well because ... i'd like him to be on the council again!
And I accept the nomination, thank you.
--
Tiziano Müller
Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 29 May 2009 19:17:03 +0200
> Mounir Lamouri wrote:
>
>> Most of GLEP 23 features have already been implemented in portage.
>> Some since
>> a long time (at least in stable portage) like multiple licenses and
>> conditional
>> licenses. License group and ACCEPT_L
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:29:25 +0200
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> The people I'd like to nominate:
>
> - dertobi123 ... for his solid comments, experience, common sense,
> reliability
> - halcy0n ... even though he had to resign early I hope he finds time
> again to run for council, I really enjoy work
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:01:04 +0200
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> > The main show-stopper for this last time it came up was all those X
> > packages using their package name as a licence. Have you thought of
> > how to get that glaring QA issue addressed?
>
> That's a very bad issue I never heard about b
Tiziano Müller said:
> The people I'd like to nominate:
> - halcy0n ... even though he had to resign early I hope he finds time
> again to run for council, I really enjoy working together with him and I
> appreciate his common sense
Thanks Tiziano, but I like the extra time I'm having to work on
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:10:47 +0300
Timur Aydin wrote:
> Today I have tried to merge openswan-2.4-14 into my ~x86 system. The
> compilation failed because of a name clash:
Please attach your patch here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271987
We use bugzilla for bug reports.
/loki_val
On K, 2009-05-20 at 11:36 -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
> Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> >
> > The maintainer-wanted team owns that foo package then, which is why
> > having a different mail alias than the existing one for "new package
> > requests that aren't in gentoo tree yet" would be a good idea.
> >
On N, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Чтв, 14/05/2009 в 03:32 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет:
> > Project maintainer-wanted
> > =
>
> Mart, I think that it's good idea to create such project but with a
> different goals. I think currently maintainer-wanted al
On Monday 01 of June 2009 06:25:06 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hello fellow developers and users.
>
I nominate:
Betelgeuse
Calchan
peper
darkside
tanderson
Cardoe
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:01:04 +0200
> Mounir Lamouri wrote:
>
>>> The main show-stopper for this last time it came up was all those X
>>> packages using their package name as a licence. Have you thought of
>>> how to get that glaring QA issue addressed?
>>>
>> Tha
On K, 2009-05-20 at 00:55 +, Duncan wrote:
> Mart Raudsepp posted
> 1242777068.30374.30.ca...@localhost, excerpted below, on Wed, 20 May 2009
> 02:51:08 +0300:
>
> > It is about getting popular packages (based on various metrics) into the
> > official tree for easy access and with known qual
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> This feature (ACCEPT_LICENSE) is important to remove check_license()
> call from ebuilds which need user input while merging. Interaction in
> ebuild should be avoided and it is a blocker for a fully functional
> portage backend for packageki
Peter Alfredsen writes:
> Please attach your patch here:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271987
>
> We use bugzilla for bug reports.
>
Done, thank you for providing the link to the existing bug report.
--
Timur Aydin
All,
The current council meetings have gotten completely out of hand for
weeks meetings have become nothing more then a continuation of the
senseless bicker-fest that have become the e-mail threads on GLEP54,
GLEP55, and EAPI-3 without any real progress or sense coming of them.
It's taken me a lit
Hello,
I haven't been able to attend a council meeting for a bit since it
occurs at ~2:30 am my time, but for what it's worth:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 23:15 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
[...]
> 1) Agenda Topics are posted to the appropriate mailing lists at a
> MINIMUM 7 days prior to the meeting. (
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> All,
>
> The current council meetings have gotten completely out of hand for
> weeks meetings have become nothing more then a continuation of the
> senseless bicker-fest that have become the e-mail threads on GLEP54,
> GLEP55, and EAPI-3 without any real progress or sense co
(items 1 through 2b):
> ...
+1. Go and read up Robert's Rules of Order folks. The equivalent for
your own language usually exists. Erskine May (en_GB) and Code Morin
(fr_CA) off the top of my head.
> 3) Once discussion on the topic has concluded, the council members
> will vote on the actions requ
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 06:15:43 Doug Goldstein wrote:
> All,
>
> The current council meetings have gotten completely out of hand for
> weeks meetings have become nothing more then a continuation of the
> senseless bicker-fest that have become the e-mail threads on GLEP54,
> GLEP55, and EAPI-3 with
43 matches
Mail list logo
