Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org posted
4a4d97d5.10...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:32:05
+:
I have a few ideas about this that I'll have to put in writing and share
later, but let me start by proposing that for such a change we require
the support
I'm forwarding Roy's email to the dev-announce ml for reaching the wider
community and for future reference.
Roy Bamford wrote:
All,
On behalf of the Elections project, the next Gentoo Council will be
composed of:-
Ned Ludd (solar)
Petteri Räty (betelgeuse)
Denis
* Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council/2009/council-200906-nominees.xml
Please archive the manifestos somewhere under the project space
like it was done the last years.
Looking back at the 2005 list of nominees, all external links are
On 02-07-2009 22:06:33 +0100, AllenJB wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 24-06-2009 13:51:37 +, Torsten Veller wrote:
| mail-mta/exim.
I'm looking for users that want to help maintaining Exim. Especially if
you feel like becoming a Gentoo developer at some time, contact me
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
I have a few ideas about this that I'll have to put in writing and share
later, but let me start by proposing that for such a change we require
the support of at least 2/3 of the devs that vote *and* a minimum of 1/3
of all devs.
I'd use absolute majority
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:43:53PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:29:39 +0200
Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Which groups who would like to be able to contribute currently feel
that they can't, why do they feel that and why haven't they said so?
For
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Petteri Rätybetelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:00:35 +0300
Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:25:11 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:45:29 +0300
Theo Chatzimichos
Luca Barbato wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
I have a few ideas about this that I'll have to put in writing and share
later, but let me start by proposing that for such a change we require
the support of at least 2/3 of the devs that vote *and* a minimum of 1/3
of all devs.
I'd use
Hi Torsten.
Torsten Veller wrote:
* Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council/2009/council-200906-nominees.xml
Please archive the manifestos somewhere under the project space
like it was done the last years.
Looking back at the 2005
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:08:48 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually pkgcore folk have pushed for stuff. mtime preservation is a
simple example of things I've pushed for- at the time implemented by
portage/pkgcore, eliminates the orphan potential for .pyc and other
generated
This week has gone pretty well and I'm hoping to get a testing server
up soon, though it looks like it will be running the backend in a
virtual machine due to the root privileges requirement. I've added
support for several more output formats: ext2 image, jffs2, and two
different styles of
On Monday 15 June 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
If there are interactive ebuilds that don't declare
PROPERTIES=interactive, you can just compile a list and post it to
gentoo-dev-announce telling maintainers to add it or you will do it at
some date X a week from the announcement or later at your
12 matches
Mail list logo
