On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:45:21 +0300
Markos Chandras wrote:
> This is actually true. Maybe all devs should have access on docs since the
> docs teams are dead. I would suggest to let all developers contribute to
> documentation whether they belong to docs team or not
No. Many (most?) devs do not
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:58:56 +0100
AllenJB wrote:
> I have no intention of "shitting all over" anybodys work. My apologies
> if that was the interpretation. I'm simply escalating an issue I have
> raised before to somewhere I think it'll get more attention.
I realize (now) it wasn't your intentio
Joshua Saddler wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:54:31 +0100
> AllenJB wrote:
>
>> I have tried to bring up the issues on the docs team list but pretty
>> much get shot down and told everything is fine and dandy.
>
> Going to have to call "bullshit" on this one. Who told you that on the lists?
>
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:54:31 +0100
AllenJB wrote:
> I have tried to bring up the issues on the docs team list but pretty
> much get shot down and told everything is fine and dandy.
Going to have to call "bullshit" on this one. Who told you that on the lists?
Have you *seen* *any* of the posts *
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
>> Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED="1" to force ld behave
>> asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
>>
>> Speak up if you think it's a terrible idea.
>>
>> Thanks, Samuli
>>
>>
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:33 PM, AllenJB wrote:
> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
[...]
>>> I personally would happily donate my time to working on the docs, if
>>> only it didn't involve a markup language nobody else uses.
>>
>> You're in luck, the Beacon project has perfected it's Django branch
>> which
On 04-10-2009 00:11:06 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Perhaps we could add a new function to the flag-o-matic that does the
> > CHOST check, and appends the flag, so the check code wouldn't have to be
> > duplicated in ebuilds? It should be rather trivial.
> >
>
> ok, chost check would be cheap
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> On 03-10-2009 23:27:41 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> The amount of pkgs in tree with valid code that fails with asneeded is
>>> close to zero. We can use this,
>>>
>>> if use userland_GNU; then
>>> append-ldflags -Wl,--no-as-needed
>>> fi
>>>
>>
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 03-10-2009 23:27:41 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> The amount of pkgs in tree with valid code that fails with asneeded is
>> close to zero. We can use this,
>>
>> if use userland_GNU; then
>> append-ldflags -Wl,--no-as-needed
>> fi
>>
>> logic so it won't cause you trou
On 03-10-2009 23:27:41 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> The amount of pkgs in tree with valid code that fails with asneeded is
> close to zero. We can use this,
>
> if use userland_GNU; then
> append-ldflags -Wl,--no-as-needed
> fi
>
> logic so it won't cause you troubles. Or the obvious shorter &
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 03-10-2009 22:35:58 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300
>>> Samuli Suominen wrote:
Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED="1" to force ld behave
asneeded we could use this for the developer -targe
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED="1" to force ld behave
> asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
>
> Speak up if you think it's a terrible idea.
>
> Thanks, Samuli
>
>
I think it's a not terrib
On 03-10-2009 22:35:58 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300
> > Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED="1" to force ld behave
> >> asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
> >>
> >>
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:54:31 +0100
AllenJB wrote:
> I personally would happily donate my time to working on the docs, if
> only it didn't involve a markup language nobody else uses. I suggested a
> closed wiki for official documentation, but was again shot down saying
> that the existing team (wh
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED="1" to force ld behave
>> asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
>>
>> Speak up if you think it's a terrible idea.
>
> Well, it does brea
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED="1" to force ld behave
> asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
>
> Speak up if you think it's a terrible idea.
Well, it does break correct code, so it's about on p
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2009-10-03 21:13:59 Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
>> Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED="1" to force ld behave
>> asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
>
> IMHO it should be set in the base profile so that everybody b
2009-10-03 21:13:59 Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
> Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED="1" to force ld behave
> asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
IMHO it should be set in the base profile so that everybody benefits from this.
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Dne sobota 03 Říjen 2009 21:13:59 Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
> Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED="1" to force ld behave
> asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
>
> Speak up if you think it's a terrible idea.
>
> Thanks, Samuli
>
Could we enable it everywher
Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED="1" to force ld behave
asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
Speak up if you think it's a terrible idea.
Thanks, Samuli
For what it's worth, I've got an updated PowerPC handbook pretty much
ready to go (still missing some sections that I want to add for the
PS3). However, I haven't gotten around to figuring out what all of the
XML replacement variables are currently and if they were going to change
to reflect autobu
AllenJB posted on Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:03:16 +0100 as excerpted:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/260403 )
>
> The last comment on that bug by a docs team member basically says:
>> All the doc they need is 'Boot CD, follow on-screen instruction. If it
>> fails, file a bug for the release team'. Done.
>>
> On Saturday 03 of October 2009 18:17:36 David Abbott wrote:
> > I always use the x86 Quick install guide [1] I did an amd64 install
> > using it and can not recall changing anything.
>
> And i don't use any guide nor handbook any more, because i know what to do
> step by step. That doesn't mean h
On Saturday 03 of October 2009 18:17:36 David Abbott wrote:
> I always use the x86 Quick install guide [1] I did an amd64 install
> using it and can not recall changing anything.
And i don't use any guide nor handbook any more, because i know what to do
step by step. That doesn't mean handbook s
Hi all,
I made a new install the other week-end and I found a couple of
strange things so I would like to help out. The only problem is that I
am pretty newb so I can only point out small things but i would like
to help. One big thing is that we now use eselect in a lot of cases.
In addition, I m
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:24 PM, AllenJB wrote:
>> The situation with the Gentoo Handbook is quite frankly getting beyond a
>> joke for those of us donating our time to help users.
>>
>> I have tried to bring up the issues on the docs team list but pretty
>> much get shot
AllenJB wrote:
Hi all,
The situation with the Gentoo Handbook is quite frankly getting beyond a
joke for those of us donating our time to help users.
I have tried to bring up the issues on the docs team list but pretty
much get shot down and told everything is fine and dandy.
For example, quot
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:24 PM, AllenJB wrote:
> The situation with the Gentoo Handbook is quite frankly getting beyond a
> joke for those of us donating our time to help users.
>
> I have tried to bring up the issues on the docs team list but pretty
> much get shot down and told everything is fin
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:54:31 +0100
AllenJB wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The situation with the Gentoo Handbook is quite frankly getting
> beyond a joke for those of us donating our time to help users.
>
> I have tried to bring up the issues on the docs team list but pretty
> much get shot down and told
Hi all,
The situation with the Gentoo Handbook is quite frankly getting beyond a
joke for those of us donating our time to help users.
I have tried to bring up the issues on the docs team list but pretty
much get shot down and told everything is fine and dandy.
For example, quoteth the Handbook
matt mooney posted on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:40:55 -0700 as excerpted:
> I would possibly be interested in maintaining mc. I am not a current
> gentoo developer, but I have been trying to get involved recently. Is
> there anyway I could help out? Or is this only for current gentoo
> developers.
Hi,
091003 Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 21:57, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> The latest version is now patch free, 4.7.0_pre3,
>> and there's only 1 bug open. So I'm basically done with it.
>> If any of you actually use it, feel free to substitute me
>> from the metadata.xml, I just pick
32 matches
Mail list logo
