As an extension of the October trustees meeting, the Ten team enquired
about license usage for including firmware and binary-source material on
the media they were producing.
The items they wanted were fine, but I realize that it's a more general
issue, that is solved well by GLEP23.
I'd like to
Maciej Mrozowski posted on Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:59:56 +0200 as excerpted:
> 1. Proposition to split desktop profile to: KDE, Gnome, (and maybe some
> others).
> That being said active presence of some Gnome guys would be most
> appreciated.
With that under discussion, what about a kde (or full des
On Wednesday 21 of October 2009 22:34:18 Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> 2009/10/21 Maciej Mrozowski :
> > 1. Proposition to split desktop profile to: KDE, Gnome, (and maybe some
> > others).
>
> How about making a desktop profile with everything common and being
> the parent of Gnome, KDE, XFCE, etc... s
2009/10/21 Maciej Mrozowski :
> 1. Proposition to split desktop profile to: KDE, Gnome, (and maybe some
> others).
How about making a desktop profile with everything common and being
the parent of Gnome, KDE, XFCE, etc... sub-profiles with the specific
stuff?
Denis.
Samuli Suominen posted on Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:00:43 +0300 as excerpted:
> If a machine is not migrated to a new valid profile then emerge will
> have very limited functionality.
If a machine is not migrated to a new valid profile before the deprecated
profiles are removed, emerge will have very
Hello!
> As you might know, the Gentoo KDE project provides an overlay with KDE4
> live ebuilds ("kde" in layman) and some of their dependencies.
It's been about 1,5 years ago when I announced the availability of the re-
designed KDE overlay which has since been our playground/testing ground for
On Tuesday 20 of October 2009 20:33:12 Alex Alexander wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The KDE Team will have its usual monthly meeting this Thursday.
>
> Date: Thursday, 2009/10/22
> Time: 1900 UTC
> Channel: #gentoo-meetings
I'd like to suggest following agenda items:
1. Proposition to split desktop
Alec Warner wrote:
> I'm trying to avoid using 'you' in the announcement which is why all
> the rewording.
Thanks, looks better.
Title: Using default-linux profile is now obsolete
Author: Samuli Suominen
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2009-10-21
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Pro
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> For http://bugs.gentoo.org/287976, A news item:
>> Would this work?
>
> -- cut --
>
> Title: Usage of default-linux as profile is obsolete
> Author: Samuli Suominen
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2009-10-21
Afaik, you can already do this.
Make a file in /etc/portage/sets/critical, or whatever you want to call
it, and in there list the packages you are concerned about.
Then you can do:
emerge -NDup @critical
to see the packages in that set that need to be upgraded or you can use
@critical in any ot
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> For http://bugs.gentoo.org/287976, A news item:
>> Would this work?
>
Does this mean that you haven't tested it? If it's tested with the
oldest Portage version that people are expected to be using, then fine
by me. I don't think this bug comes to
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> For http://bugs.gentoo.org/287976, A news item:
> Would this work?
-- cut --
Title: Usage of default-linux as profile is obsolete
Author: Samuli Suominen
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2009-10-21
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Profile: default-linux
The
Of course, by "safe" I meant "unsafe" or "needs-additional-care" or
whatever,... My bad.
Regards Ladislav Laska
S pozdravem Ladislav Laska
---
xmpp/jabber: ladislav.la...@jabber.cz
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Ladislav Laska
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One can see some similarity to a thread around
For http://bugs.gentoo.org/287976, A news item:
-- cut --
Title: Usage of default-linux as profile is obsolete
Author: Samuli Suominen
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2009-10-21
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Profile: default-linux
The profiles in default-linux/ have been depreca
Hi,
One can see some similarity to a thread around week or two old (about
critical packages). I would imagine, that a simple and straightforward
solution would be to make a new set of packages. Since we already have
world and system sets, it wouldn't hurt to have a third, "safe" list
which would b
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 October 2009 09:06:29 Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>> As I'm building the toolchain myself too, I configure it with the
>> 32bit host triplet on each platform, usually disabling multilib.
>
> this doesnt make any sense to me
What exactly doesn't make sense t
16 matches
Mail list logo
