On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:12:44PM +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jeremy Olexa :
> > I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at
> > this point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out
> > there that they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYW
Hi,
Jeremy Olexa :
> I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at
> this point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out
> there that they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value
> because the shape of ~mips is so...bad.
Don't remove an architectur
As set out in bug #304435 [1], we should declare some policy about
changes to arch profiles in devmanual or in the Developer Handbook.
Basically, I would want to have this apply to arch profile changes as
well:
[5] http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html says:
= Keywording on Upgr
On 02/11/2010 08:56 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>>> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
>>> profiles/profiles.desc?
>>> The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a
>>> `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is
>>> an increase of rough
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:56:58PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> > At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or
> > not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction-
> > mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217-
> > literally ~54% of
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:56:58PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at this
> point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out there that
> they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value because the shape
> of ~mips
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:41 -0800, Brian Harring
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
>> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
>> profiles/profiles.desc?
>>
>>
>> The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a
>> `repoman -
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> profiles/profiles.desc?
>
>
> The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a
> `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is
> an i
Hi,
Torsten Veller :
> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> profiles/profiles.desc?
Agreement here. Maybe a restart on non-obsolete MIPS hardware (read
Loongson instead of SGI) would be great.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.o
Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
profiles/profiles.desc?
The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a
`repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is
an increase of roughly 66 percent.
repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of
On 02/11/2010 11:16 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le mercredi 10 février 2010 à 23:02 +, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a
> écrit :
>> ssuominen10/02/10 17:41:06
>>
>> Modified: ChangeLog evince-2.24.2.ebuild
>> evince-2.26.2.ebuild
>> evince-2.28.1.e
Le mercredi 10 février 2010 à 23:02 +, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a
écrit :
> ssuominen10/02/10 17:41:06
>
> Modified: ChangeLog evince-2.24.2.ebuild
> evince-2.26.2.ebuild
> evince-2.28.1.ebuild evince-2.28.2.ebuild
> Log:
> Update poppler depend
12 matches
Mail list logo
