On Sunday 14 of March 2010 06:09:44 James Cloos wrote:
> > "BdG" == Ben de Groot writes:
> BdG> Abandoned packages do not belong in the portage tree.
>
> Nonsense. That attitude only servers to harm the user base.
>
> Leaving them in does not.
But leaving them broken and unmaintained in ma
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 02:02:46AM +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 13:16 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
> > While I agree in principle within mixins, no one here is discussing
> > the QA affect of it- right now we can do visibility scans of
> > combinations of gnome + amd64 + 201
> "BdG" == Ben de Groot writes:
BdG> Abandoned packages do not belong in the portage tree.
Nonsense. That attitude only servers to harm the user base.
Leaving them in does not.
-JimC
--
James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 13:16 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:40:00PM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> > mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Mart Raudsepp:
> >
> > > Instead I think we should be improving "eselect profile" to support
> > > multiple inheriting /etc/make
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 11:48 +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> I found your proposal about mixing profiles awesome, and I am willing to work
> on this. In fact, I'm going to raise the issue on KDE's meeting this Thursday
> at 20:00 UTC. Any freedesktop team members will be welcome there. But I'm n
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 16:47 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
>
> Even so, if we choose not to implement the split now, there are
> problems that need addressing in the current situation. The Qt team
> finds the mysql dependency that was added to the desktop profile
> three months ago (see bug #291996) u
Samuli Suominen posted on Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:21:52 +0200 as excerpted:
> On 03/13/2010 07:07 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers
>> use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't
>> see why maintainers would be
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:40:00PM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Mart Raudsepp:
>
> > Instead I think we should be improving "eselect profile" to support
> > multiple inheriting /etc/make.profile files in a user friendly fashion,
> > and in the end remo
On 03/12/2010 11:27 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 03/12/2010 11:39 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> In eclasses there's often use for outputting QA warnings for ebuild
>> authors (at least in java and python could immediately make use of
>> this). Currently Portage has eqawarn available but it's considered
On 03/13/2010 07:21 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 03/13/2010 07:07 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers
>> use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't
>> see why maintainers would be any more likely to act tha
On 03/13/2010 07:07 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers
> use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't
> see why maintainers would be any more likely to act than an arch team
> comprised of multiple people in the
On 03/12/2010 11:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> Since all the arch team does is stabilize or keyword, the maintainer
> needs to know if other issues come up with the bug after it is closed.
>
The maintainer is the reporter or in Cc.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
On 03/12/2010 10:11 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200, Petteri Räty
> wrote:
>> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
>> bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
>> question but there's a difference of opini
# Joe Peterson (13 Mar 2010)
# Old, unmainted standalone kernel modules for older kernels.
# Kernels 2.6.29-rc1 and newer include integrated btrfs.
# Bug #285357 reports version 0.17 (newest standalone) does not build.
# Last rited: to be removed in 30 days.
sys-fs/btrfs
-Joe
On Friday 12 March 2010 15:18:21 Robert Bradbury wrote:
> It would appear that the pending (0321) mask of Qt3 will break
> sci-misc/qcad, sci-chemistry/xdrawchem and x11-misc/glunarclock.
>
[..]
>
> Thank you,
> Robert Bradbury
The decision about removing Qt3 has been made 9 months ago, the decis
On 03/13/2010 12:34 PM, Matti Bickel wrote:
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> if a package is broken, and been in treecleaners queue for too long, and
>> it would be a semi-trivial fix, it simply doesn't get done without manpower
>
> Because i can't find this info on the treecleaner project page: is the
On Friday 12 March 2010 23:47:05 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:11:50PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200, Petteri R??ty
> >
> > wrote:
> > > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
> > > bug with only a single arch.
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:34:22 +0100
Matti Bickel wrote:
> I have found 4 bugs assigned to treeclea...@gentoo.org, but i'm sure i
> missed something.
>
If you have time to spare, bugs assigned to maintainer-needed@ and
often rotting in bugzilla for ages despite having patches included will
give y
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> if a package is broken, and been in treecleaners queue for too long, and
> it would be a semi-trivial fix, it simply doesn't get done without manpower
Because i can't find this info on the treecleaner project page: is there
a bugzilla query for the "treecleaners queue", so
On 03/13/2010 01:07 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:33:12 +0100
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>
>> On 12 March 2010 16:59, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>> Or like the old gtk-1: completely abandon the package and let the
>>> consumers upgrade slowly. IMHO this is the less annoying approach for
>
On Friday 12 March 2010 19:39:48 Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 10:48, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> > First of all, I'll delay the commit since I need to write documentation
> > patches, and I won't be able, as I'll leave soon for a conference and
> > will be back on Monday.
>
> What exactl
21 matches
Mail list logo
