Hello,
Am 29.09.2011 17:02, schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
Hi everyone,
The issue of Manifest signing came up in #gentoo-hardened channel ...
again. Its clearly a security issue and yet many manifests in the tree
are still not signed. Is there any chance that we can agree to reject
unsigned
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 01:03:21PM +0100, enno+gen...@groeper-berlin.de wrote:
I followed the threads about manifest signing with interest and even had
a look at the manifest signing guide [4]. Sounds nice at first view.
But, please correct me, if I'm wrong. I didn't find a place where these
when i first wrote enew{user,group} oh-so-long-ago, the reason for the [extra]
arguments was the assumption that i am short sighted. i figured someone would
come up with some creative need for passing additional flags that i couldn't
possibly think of.
however, in the ~9 years since, all i
It appears that when adding any new license, one needs to send a
notice to gentoo-dev. I have added CCPL-Attribution-2.5 (see
attachment or http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode)
and added it to the FREE-DOCUMENTS license group (same as
CCPL-Attribution-3.0, acked by Robin Jonson)*.
Dear all,
1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory?
In my personal opinion this is missing there, if only for historical
reasons... Should we still start one?
as there was only positive feedback to this suggestion, I'll create a
ChangeLog file in the eclass directory during the
On Wednesday 26 October 2011 19:40:24 Mike Frysinger wrote:
i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell,
is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for
keeping these before i punt them ?
hmm, seems a few packages in the tree want this functionality. but
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:11:46 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear all,
1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory?
In my personal opinion this is missing there, if only for historical
reasons... Should we still start one?
as there was only positive
Dear all,
2) I'd like to suggest that for changelogs that grow beyond a certain size
(e.g. profiles/ChangeLog) the file is rotated similar to /var/log
logfiles. I.e. the current file is renamed with a date extension and a new
file is started. This has the benefit that the archived file is
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 01:42:44 Ryan Hill wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:11:46 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear all,
1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory?
In my personal opinion this is missing there, if only for historical
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:41:29 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 01:42:44 Ryan Hill wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:11:46 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
as there was only positive feedback to this suggestion, I'll create
On 11/02/2011 08:33 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
I currently count 19 relevant files. If we keep the 100k limit and rotate
yearly, this will be doable by hand in the foreseeable future and any attempt
at automating is a complete waste of time.
Opinions, flames, ...?
Just an
11 matches
Mail list logo
