On 11/24/2011 08:57 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> we have a new herd called ayatana (i'm currently the only member, but
> anyone intrested is free to join)
>
> it's aimed at maintaining the ubuntu -invented libraries many apps tend
> to use thesedays:
>
> $ grep -r "herd.*ayatana" */*/metadata.xml
On 11/24/2011 10:10 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Samuli Suominen schrieb:
>> we have a new herd called ayatana (i'm currently the only member, but
>> anyone intrested is free to join)
>>
>> it's aimed at maintaining the ubuntu -invented libraries many apps tend
>> to use thesedays:
>
Samuli Suominen schrieb:
> we have a new herd called ayatana (i'm currently the only member, but
> anyone intrested is free to join)
>
> it's aimed at maintaining the ubuntu -invented libraries many apps tend
> to use thesedays:
Very nice. I have been working on some ubuntuone and unity ebuilds,
we have a new herd called ayatana (i'm currently the only member, but
anyone intrested is free to join)
it's aimed at maintaining the ubuntu -invented libraries many apps tend
to use thesedays:
$ grep -r "herd.*ayatana" */*/metadata.xml
dev-libs/libappindicator/metadata.xml: ayatana
dev-libs/lib
On 11/24/2011 07:34 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:47 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> wrote:
>> Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
>> right?
>
> Not until it is stabilized and made the default. I'm not sure what
> the plans are for that.
It's
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Paludis doesn't want you to run lafilefixer since it breaks VDB, and
> won't integrate any functionality along these lines unless it's EAPI
> controlled and well specified.
IIUC, Portage fixes libtool archives after the src_install phase but
bef
On 11/24/2011 07:56 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Due chiiph retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
>
> dev-util/dissy
> net-misc/axel
> net-misc/vidalia
>
>
>
> Thanks for taking them
>
Since I'm taking care of net-misc/tor, I'll take net-misc/vidali.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gen
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:14:01 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Also maybe it could still be needed by people using other package
> manager (but I am a portage user and don't know how these problems are
> solved in pkgcore/paludis :-/)
Paludis doesn't want you to run lafilefixer since it breaks VDB, and
El jue, 24-11-2011 a las 12:12 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > .should ~arch packages with no maintainer really be moved to stable?*
> >
> > (* assuming no other outside forces, like it's a dep of something else
> > that needs to go sta
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> .should ~arch packages with no maintainer really be moved to stable?*
>
> (* assuming no other outside forces, like it's a dep of something else
> that needs to go stable)
I support stabilizing bug-free newer versions of maintainer-neede
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 17:14 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El jue, 24-11-2011 a las 07:37 -0800, Brian Dolbec escribió:
> > On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:47 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > > On 11/24/11 1:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > > Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/11/11 10:17 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 11/23/11 3:27 PM, Torsten Veller wrote:
>> What do you expect to happen with bugs assigned to maintainer-needed?
>
> I'm going to CC arches myself after a while, similarly as with bugs with
> oth
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't
> have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer:
> app-portage/autounmask
> app-portage/demerge
I would volunteer to proxy maintain these packages, if Christian still
El jue, 24-11-2011 a las 07:37 -0800, Brian Dolbec escribió:
> On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:47 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > On 11/24/11 1:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
> > >
> > > dev-util/lafilefixer
> >
> > Do we still
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote:
app-text/pdfshuffler
I'll take this one
Andrey
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:47 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 11/24/11 1:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
> >
> > dev-util/lafilefixer
>
> Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
> right?
>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:47 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
> right?
Not until it is stabilized and made the default. I'm not sure what
the plans are for that.
Rich
On 11/23/11 3:27 PM, Torsten Veller wrote:
> What do you expect to happen with bugs assigned to maintainer-needed?
I'm going to CC arches myself after a while, similarly as with bugs with
other maintainers who don't respond.
> I don't know if any of the packages is really good to be stabilized.
>
On 11/24/11 1:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
>
> dev-util/lafilefixer
Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
right?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> net-misc/axel
Mine now.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sounds like a sane change.
--
Gilles Dartiguelongue
Gentoo
Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't
have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer:
app-portage/autounmask
app-portage/demerge
Ian, if you want to completely remove yourself from maintaining any
package, please told us so.
Thanks for taking them
Due chiiph retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
dev-util/dissy
net-misc/axel
net-misc/vidalia
Thanks for taking them
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
app-text/pdfshuffler
dev-util/lafilefixer
Thanks for taking them
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Due rbu retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
net-libs/libmrss
net-libs/libnxml
Thanks for taking them
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
25 matches
Mail list logo
