- Original Message -
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us
wrote:
https://github.com/gmt/gmt-cygwin-overlay/blob/master/sys-apps/portage/files/portage-2.2.01.20271-cygdll_protect.patch
Consistency in the style would be nice.
For instance in
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's
XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage.
XML-RPC is shit.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:REST_API
On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's
XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage.
XML-RPC is shit.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/03/12 04:04 AM, Ian Whyman wrote:
On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use
Bugzilla's
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Ian Whyman thev00...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's
XML-RPC api to avoid
On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
Any ideas?
I'm guessing it was
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us wrote:
- Original Message -
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us
wrote:
https://github.com/gmt/gmt-cygwin-overlay/blob/master/sys-apps/portage/files/portage-2.2.01.20271-cygdll_protect.patch
Hello
I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to create a
separate partition for /usr/portage tree. I remember my first Gentoo
systems had it inside / and that lead to a lot of fragmentation, much
slower emerge -pvuDN world (I benchmarked it when I changed my
partitioning
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to create a
separate partition for /usr/portage tree. I remember my first Gentoo
systems had it inside / and that lead to a lot of fragmentation, much
slower emerge -pvuDN
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:49:00 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to create a
separate partition for /usr/portage tree.
I don't know whether you've heard, but PackageKit (a hard dependency of
udev as of 185, to allow automatic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 02:01 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to
create a separate partition for /usr/portage tree. I remember my
first
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 20:01 +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to create a
separate partition for /usr/portage tree. I remember my first Gentoo
systems had it inside / and that
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org
The partitioning scheme is something that the user needs to decide on
*before* getting Gentoo up and running. After the user had finished
installing the operating system, it's too late to inform him about the
advantages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/03/12 02:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
tetrom...@gentoo.org
The partitioning scheme is something that the user needs to
decide on *before* getting Gentoo up and running. After the user
Il 27/03/2012 20:53, Ian Stakenvicius ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/03/12 02:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
tetrom...@gentoo.org
The partitioning scheme is something that the user needs to
decide on *before*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 02:53 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/03/12 02:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
tetrom...@gentoo.org
The partitioning scheme is something that the user needs to
decide on
All,
I know this has come up before, but I don't really recall what the
specific objections were.
IMO the portage directory doesn't belong under /usr at all.
I was chatting with another developer who uses
/var/cache/portage/{tree,distfiles}, and I'm thinking about switching my
default setup to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 03:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know this has come up before, but I don't really recall what the
specific objections were.
IMO the portage directory doesn't belong under /usr at all. I was
chatting with another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/03/12 03:04 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
You know, we have Code Listing 2.1: Filesystem Example in
Section 4, we could always adjust that to have a /usr/portage
partition in it (take a bit of space away from /home, or
something)
It
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:47:15PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org
1. ext4, not ext3, needs to be recommended as the default filesystem. We
have kernel 3.2 marked stable, there is no need to keep talking about
ext4 as if
On 28 March 2012 07:53, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
You know, we have Code Listing 2.1: Filesystem Example in Section 4,
we could always adjust that to have a /usr/portage partition in it
(take a bit of space away from /home, or something)
It doesn't recommend/require anything,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/03/12 03:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know this has come up before, but I don't really recall what the
specific objections were.
IMO the portage directory doesn't belong under /usr at all. I was
chatting with another developer
On 28 March 2012 08:15, Sven Vermeulen sw...@gentoo.org wrote:
Then again, Gentoo is about choice. It just seems like we're
presenting users with more choices than makes sense for a newbie. If
there is a choice between something that 99.99% of users will want,
and some ancient piece of cruft
On 28 March 2012 08:05, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
All,
I know this has come up before, but I don't really recall what the
specific objections were.
IMO the portage directory doesn't belong under /usr at all.
I was chatting with another developer who uses
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:20:45AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 28 March 2012 08:15, Sven Vermeulen sw...@gentoo.org wrote:
Then again, Gentoo is about choice. It just seems like we're
presenting users with more choices than makes sense for a newbie. If
there is a choice between
/var/cache/repositories/gentoo/*
/var/cache/repositories/perl-experimental/*
/var/cache/distfiles/*
/var/cache/packages/*
Actually, now I think of it, repositories /might/ be suitable for
being under /db/
the repository does sort of function like a database, the tools we use
to access it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 03:13 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/03/12 03:04 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
You know, we have Code Listing 2.1: Filesystem Example in
Section 4, we could always adjust that to have a /usr/portage
partition in it (take a bit
On 27/03/12 21:17, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/03/12 03:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know this has come up before, but I don't really recall what the
specific objections were.
IMO the portage directory doesn't belong under /usr at all. I was
chatting with another developer who
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:25:58AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 28 March 2012 08:05, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
/var/cache/repositories/gentoo/*
/var/cache/repositories/perl-experimental/*
/var/cache/distfiles/*
/var/cache/packages/*
These sub directories are all portage
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:29:34PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
Why not just the separate quick install guide like we have that lists
steps and the handbook if yu want more details?
We came from that. It means we need to start managing just the commands
for each architecture. After a while,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:29:50AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
/var/cache/repositories/gentoo/*
/var/cache/repositories/perl-experimental/*
/var/cache/distfiles/*
/var/cache/packages/*
Actually, now I think of it, repositories /might/ be suitable for
being under /db/
the
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:40 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:25:58AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 28 March 2012 08:05, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
/var/cache/repositories/gentoo/*
/var/cache/repositories/perl-experimental/*
On 03/27/12 14:34, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
The partitioning scheme is something that the user needs to decide on
*before* getting Gentoo up and running. After the user had finished
installing the operating system, it's too late to inform him about the
advantages of a separate /usr/portage.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:47:10PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:40 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:25:58AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 28 March 2012 08:05, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 03:47 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:40 PM, William Hubbs
willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:25:58AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 28 March 2012 08:05, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 03/27/12 15:13, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
On 03/27/2012 03:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know this has come up before, but I don't really recall what the
specific objections were.
IMO the portage directory doesn't belong under /usr at all. I was
chatting with another developer who
On 28 March 2012 08:47, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
The gentoo-x86 ebuild tree is not necessarily portage related.
However I think we should paint the bike shed '/srv/tree'
I for one never developed any love for /srv , its always seemed like
an unwanted bit of poo left behind by an
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:19:10PM +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
That version of pybugz worked
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 14:34:03, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 20:01 +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to create a
separate partition for /usr/portage
On 28 March 2012 08:59, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
What I was wanting to discuss mainly was that /usr/portage isn't right;
I think we need to move that out of the /usr directory.
I'm not sure what the new default should be, nor how the default should
be decided. Maybe we just
On 28 March 2012 08:57, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
Could we amend this to also include the benefits of ZFS and why you
would want to use XFS or reiserfs instead of ext{2,3,4} as your
filesystem in situations where ZFS is not yet appropriate (e.g. using it
on Gentoo stable)? We
- Original Message -
'if not os.environ[PORTAGE_PYTONPATH]:'
If PORTAGE_PYTHONPATH is not in os.environ then it will raise a
KeyError, that is why we are doing a contains to begin with.
I somehow got the idea that the python gods had sprinkled magical syntax-sugar
on bool(x[y])?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/03/12 04:08 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 28 March 2012 08:59, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
What I was wanting to discuss mainly was that /usr/portage isn't
right; I think we need to move that out of the /usr directory.
I'm not
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:44:03 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
eclass version 2.0, i hope i haven't forgotten any comment
I improved some comments/description after a second read also.
since there were no more comments: eclass committed, thanks all
44 matches
Mail list logo
