On 30 March 2012 17:08, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
in the install handbook gives /usr/local/portage as an example overlay
directory. I thought it was implicit that one shouldn't edit or create
files in /usr/portage because they may be overwritten by the system e.g.
during an
On 29-03-2012 22:12:40 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
For example, my /usr/portage/ on this system looks like this:
portage/
tree/
profiles/ - tree/profiles/
distfiles/
packages/
layman/
it is a big improvement over the current
Excerpts from Samuli Suominen's message of 2012-03-29 19:59:17 +0200:
I've been told dracut is able to handle this. Unverified.
Dracut doesn't need anything built static.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Will start to reply but will take some time as I don't have much this
days :(
El mar, 27-03-2012 a las 20:01 +0200, Sven Vermeulen escribió:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to create a
separate partition
El mar, 27-03-2012 a las 14:34 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 20:01 +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to create a
separate partition for
El mar, 27-03-2012 a las 14:53 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/03/12 02:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
tetrom...@gentoo.org
The partitioning scheme is something that the user needs
On 03/30/2012 10:56 AM, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
Excerpts from Samuli Suominen's message of 2012-03-29 19:59:17 +0200:
I've been told dracut is able to handle this. Unverified.
Dracut doesn't need anything built static.
Thanks for verifying. Expected nothing less. I've reopened the
El mar, 27-03-2012 a las 16:05 -0400, Alec Moskvin escribió:
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 14:34:03, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 20:01 +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't
Hello,
I would like to wish you all a happy birthday, 10 years already since
first release (Gentoo 1.0)! Here is a little thing [1] we made to
celebrate it. Recipe: two layers of Génoise (for each: 6 eggs, 180g
sucre, 180g farine, vanilla sugar), between layers and on top: full
cream with beaten
On 03/30/2012 04:00 PM, Axel wrote:
Hello,
I would like to wish you all a happy birthday, 10 years already since
first release (Gentoo 1.0)! Here is a little thing [1] we made to
celebrate it. Recipe: two layers of Génoise (for each: 6 eggs, 180g
sucre, 180g farine, vanilla sugar), between
On 30 March 2012 14:25, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/30/2012 04:00 PM, Axel wrote:
Hello,
I would like to wish you all a happy birthday, 10 years already since
first release (Gentoo 1.0)! Here is a little thing [1] we made to
celebrate it. Recipe: two layers of Génoise
On 03/22/2012 07:50 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 03/22/2012 03:29 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 03/22/2012 09:25 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
If anyone is intrested in helping around with Xfce we have 2 bigger
tasks on going:
1) Pass --libexecdir=${EPREFIX} to all plugins installing to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Find attached a license for an application I'm using. I've already
cleared that redistribution of the package is okay. [1]
I didn't see anything in there much more than the standard don't
blame us if your system blows up, and some fairly standard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/30/2012 12:08 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
Find attached a license for an application I'm using. I've already
cleared that redistribution of the package is okay. [1]
I didn't see anything in there much more than the standard don't
blame
I wrote sys-freebsd/virtio-kmod (bug 410199) while studying
Gentoo/FreeBSD as part of an attempt to port gptzfsloader to Gentoo
Linux. naota wrote an improvement that would be useful to send upstream.
However, the GPL-2 license poses a problem according to conversations
that I had in #gentoo-dev.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:34:26 -0400
Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
I wrote sys-freebsd/virtio-kmod (bug 410199) while studying
Gentoo/FreeBSD as part of an attempt to port gptzfsloader to Gentoo
Linux. naota wrote an improvement that would be useful to send
upstream. However, the
On 03/30/12 13:34, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:34:26 -0400
Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
I wrote sys-freebsd/virtio-kmod (bug 410199) while studying
Gentoo/FreeBSD as part of an attempt to port gptzfsloader to Gentoo
Linux. naota wrote an improvement that would
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:52:18PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote:
The improvement is to the ebuild itself. It is a variable containing a
list of directories upon which the module's build system depends.
I spoke to naota and he doesn't have any problem sending this upstream,
so I sent an email
On 03/30/12 13:52, Richard Yao wrote:
I want sys-freebsd/virtio-kmod to be BSD-2 licensed, but I do not expect
the version that enters the portage tree to be BSD-2 licensed unless
people clarify that it is okay to license ebuilds under something other
than the GPL-2.
To clarify, I would like
On 03/30/12 14:00, Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:52:18PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote:
The improvement is to the ebuild itself. It is a variable containing a
list of directories upon which the module's build system depends.
I spoke to naota and he doesn't have any problem sending
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Richard Yao wrote:
what do you mean by 'relicense' ? for ebuilds, you'll have to ask
permission to all contributors to this area, and, afaik, the
foundation owns copyrights so it has a word to say too.
if you mean the 'LICENSE' field of ebuilds, then this is not the
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ebuilds in the Portage tree must be licensed under the GPL. This is
part of the Gentoo Social Contract [1], so I guess it won't change
anytime soon.
And IMHO, we would be ill-advised to allow different licenses for
This is from gnustep-base.eclass:
egnustep_doc() {
if [[ -d ./Documentation ]] ; then
# Check documentation presence
cd ${S}/Documentation
if [[ -f ./[mM]akefile || -f ./GNUmakefile ]] ; then
emake ${GS_ENV[@]} all || die doc make failed
Those are really just nits, but I thought I'd share what I've noticed.
cabal-mksetup() {
local setupdir
if [[ -n $1 ]]; then
setupdir=$1
else
setupdir=${S}
fi
rm -f ${setupdir}/Setup.{lhs,hs}
echo 'import Distribution.Simple; main =
On 03/30/12 14:47, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
I fail to understand what the license of the ebuild has to do with the
license of the package itself.
It has nothing to do with the license of the package. That is completely
separate. This has to do with the license of the ebuild itself.
FreeBSD Ports
On 03/30/12 15:12, Rich Freeman wrote:
If there are specific pains associated with not being able to submit
patches upstream or such, please do point them out and I'm sure we'll
consider what can be done to accommodate this. However, if this
really is a one-off situation then we're probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (30 Mar 2012)
# Unmaintained. Replaced by x11-libs/qt-gui[gtkstyle]
# Removal in 30 days
x11-themes/qgtkstyle
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
On 03/30/12 14:47, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
I fail to understand what the license of the ebuild has to do with the
license of the package itself.
It has nothing to do with the license of the package. That is completely
On 03/30/2012 15:36, Richard Yao wrote:
It has nothing to do with the license of the package. That is completely
separate. This has to do with the license of the ebuild itself.
FreeBSD Ports inspired Daniel Robbins to create Portage. The issue that
is our ability to share FreeBSD-specific
On 03/30/2012 10:44, James Broadhead wrote:
Remember when Gentoo had version numbers? (even though they got stuck
at 1.4 for ages?) D'awww
Maybe it's time for Gentoo-2.0?
At that glacial pace, we should catch up to Firefox's versioning shortly
before the heat death of the Universe.
--
On 03/30/12 16:19, Alec Warner wrote:
I doubt you can get the content re-licensed under a different
license. You may be able to convince folks to add an additional
license (|| (GPL-2 BSD-2)). That way Gentoo keeps its GPL-2 and
freebsd can have the code as BSD-2.
Dual-licensing is fine by me.
On 03/30/12 17:15, Joshua Kinard wrote:
Maybe it's time for Gentoo-2.0?
I think we should wait for Portage 2.2 to be stabilized before we
declare Gentoo 2.0. @preserved-libs is enough of an advance that I think
claiming 2.0 would be merited, if only for the attention it would draw
at Phoronix.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
On 03/30/12 17:15, Joshua Kinard wrote:
Maybe it's time for Gentoo-2.0?
I think we should wait for Portage 2.2 to be stabilized before we
declare Gentoo 2.0. @preserved-libs is enough of an advance that I think
33 matches
Mail list logo
