# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (28 Apr 2012)
# History of broken code, new releases use a test system
# that does not work itself and has many new dependencies.
# Current stable version blocks rubygems stabilization.
# No reverse dependencies.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
=dev-ruby/facets
El vie, 27-04-2012 a las 21:12 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:58:24 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Of course, if we take the 'quick EAPI 5 route', it won't include
anything useful. In the meantime, do we have a complete list of
candidates for EAPI 5?
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:27 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
* Get a versionator replacement into the PM
Why are we trying to make PM a brick instead of keeping stuff modular?
What does the eclass lack which could be provided by PM?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:52:07 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:27 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
* Get a versionator replacement into the PM
Why are we trying to make PM a brick instead of keeping stuff modular?
What does the
What's changed from 2006 in version handling?
Il giorno 28/apr/2012 11:39, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com ha scritto:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:52:07 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:27 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
According to upstreams homepage [1],
the current tagged v1.99.09 does support xulrunner 11.0.
@dirtyepic: Any chance to bump the version in portage?
I can take a look (and grab this package).
Is there any state-of-the-art(tm) alternative to read
On 28 April 2012 18:17, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is there any state-of-the-art(tm) alternative to read .chm ebooks? I
wouldn't want to loose this possibility.
app-text/kchmviewer
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:17:55 +0200
Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is there any state-of-the-art(tm) alternative to read .chm ebooks? I
wouldn't want to loose this possibility.
The one and only FBReader?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:09:01 +
Francesco Riosa viv...@gmail.com wrote:
What's changed from 2006 in version handling?
The ordering rules, the handling of zeroes and the behaviour of
suffixes.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, I wrote:
Just a heads up, lu_zero has discovered that the eselect git
repository contains some commits with invalid author lines. This is
a holdover from the conversion from svn to git (basically, the real
name is missing for devs who changed their Gentoo username). I'm
On 2012.04.27 18:38, Rich Freeman wrote:
[snip]
Do we as a matter of policy want to respect broken click-through
download implementations?
Rich
Yes we do.
Intent it what counts in the eyes of the law in most places.
Sites with broken click-throughs intend for them to be used.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/28/2012 01:38 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 04/28/12 01:29, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Since I've been configuring a couple of systems lately for
remote access, which include configuring the serial console, I'm
wondering if it would be a good
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
Didn't the user already accept the license by putting it in ACCEPT_LICENSE?
If not, portage will not download it.
Well, I'd argue that it is
# Kacper Kowalik xarthis...@gentoo.org (28 Apr 2012)
# No longer maintained upstream, superseeded by
# dev-python/lxml, bug 396497
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-python/xsv
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04/27/2012 06:34 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 23/08/11 00:20, Vikraman wrote:
Hi all,
Gentoostats[0] is a GSoC 2011 project to collect package statistics
from gentoo
machines. Please check it out. Bug reports and feature suggestions are
welcome.
To submit your stats, use the
On 28/04/12 08:44, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, I wrote:
Just a heads up, lu_zero has discovered that the eselect git
repository contains some commits with invalid author lines. This is
a holdover from the conversion from svn to git (basically, the real
name is missing for
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
That doesn't mean you didn't / cannot accept, merely that some (all?)
provisions are likely unenforceable in a court of law. I don't think
EULAs have been ruled illegal yet.
I doubt that my proclamation that you aren't
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 12:10:05 Steven J Long wrote:
William Hubbs wrote:
Another issue to consider is binaries that want to access things in
/usr/share/*. If a binary in /{bin,sbin} needs to access something in
/usr/share/*, you have two choices. move the binary to /usr or move the
On Friday 27 April 2012 03:30:43 Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/26/2012 11:48 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/26/2012 11:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2012 00:43:15 Jonathan Callen wrote:
On 04/26/2012 06:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
I'd like to suggest we introduce the
On 04/28/2012 02:17 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2012 03:30:43 Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/26/2012 11:48 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/26/2012 11:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2012 00:43:15 Jonathan Callen wrote:
On 04/26/2012 06:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
On 10/04/12 11:45, William Hubbs wrote:
Also, I am going to reiterate what Greg said. This is not an issue with
udev, but with the entire linux ecosystem.
As in bluez using dbus and some mount helpers requiring libraries in /usr.
There are binaries in /{bin,sbin} which link against libraries
Alec Warner posted on Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:53:03 -0700 as excerpted:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'd argue that it is impossible to accept a license in the
first place. It is possible to agree to a contract if there is
consideration on both sides
22 matches
Mail list logo
