On 15/05/12 21:07, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>> 1) Did you sleep through the /usr and initramfs flamewars?
>> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
>
> You seem to have missed the bit that this has nothing at all to do with
> systemd.
>
I guess the systemd in the url m
On 05/15/2012 08:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:15:28PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:07 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:37:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven'
On 16 May 2012 05:21, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Stelian Ionescu wrote
>> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
>> > > What specifically is your objection to udev today? Is it doing th
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:15:28PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:07 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:37:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven't updated the ChangeLog.
> >>
> >> I got into th
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:07 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:37:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven't updated the ChangeLog.
>>
>> I got into the habbit of using repoman commit -[Mm] to do that, but for
>> some reason t
Zac Medico posted on Tue, 15 May 2012 15:24:53 -0700 as excerpted:
> Hi,
>
> In case you aren't familiar with it, here's the description from the
> make.conf(5) man page:
>
> This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that
> have not been modified since they were install
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:51:03PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Stelian Ionescu wrote
> > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
> > > > What specifically is your objection to udev
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:37:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven't updated the ChangeLog.
>
> I got into the habbit of using repoman commit -[Mm] to do that, but for
> some reason that stopped working.
>
> I will use echangelog from this pon
I asked what I thought was a simple developer-type question. I don't
want this to become a public flamewar. If anybody wants to discuss the
issue with me further, please email directly to me and not the list.
--
Walter Dnes
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Stelian Ionescu wrote
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
> > > What specifically is your objection to udev today? Is it doing things
> > > you don't like? Too big? Something
All,
I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven't updated the ChangeLog.
I got into the habbit of using repoman commit -[Mm] to do that, but for
some reason that stopped working.
I will use echangelog from this ponit until I hear that repoman commit
has been fixed.
Thanks,
William
pgppTT
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
> > What specifically is your objection to udev today? Is it doing things
> > you don't like? Too big? Something else?
>
> Today, it requires an initramfs if /usr is not physically
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:55:23AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> >
> > After some more Google-searching. it looks like the "official
> > channels" way is via /etc/mdev.conf. Note that this is on a system with
> > busybox[mdev] and no udev.
Hi,
In case you aren't familiar with it, here's the description from the
make.conf(5) man page:
This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that
have not been modified since they were installed.
I think it would be a good idea to enable this by default, but I thought
I'd
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:32:57AM -0400, Olivier Cr?te wrote
>> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 01:05 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> > I *DON'T WANT* "a serious framework", I want a lightweight device
>> > manager... period... end of story. Stick with
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:32:57AM -0400, Olivier Cr?te wrote
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 01:05 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > I *DON'T WANT* "a serious framework", I want a lightweight device
> > manager... period... end of story. Stick with the unix principle of one
> > app doing one thing well. m
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> I know of no such problem with udisks, have you reported them to the
> upstream developers?
As I said, it's just what I hear — perhaps it's the usual retrograde
whining. I should probably just try udisks-glue, the only issue I see
is that it depen
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:05:57AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:56:15AM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote
>
> > I don't know at what state udev was 3 or 4 years ago, but mdev can:
> >
> > 1. Populate /dev (now unnecessary due to devtmpfs).
> > 2. Handle ownership, permissions
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:55:23AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 06:23:36PM -0700, Greg KH wrote
>
> > So you need to implement stuff such that you are not dependant on the
> > bus type. If you see a new disk, act on it, it's that simple.
> >
> > But note, please do not be
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:56:15AM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > We learned that this is not a good idea at all, and should be left to
> > userspace helper applications
> > that listen for dbus messages.
>
> Could you perhaps expand a bit on t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/15/2012 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> [..] net-misc/dibbler
I will take it
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPsp59AAoJE
Excerpts from Pacho Ramos's message of 2012-05-15 13:33:04 +0200:
> net-misc/aiccu
I can take this one.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 07:29:36 Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote:
> On 14/05/12 16:44, hasufell wrote:
> > However, I don't see references to ebuild policy (in devmanual or
> > howtos) how to handle Werror.
>
> As can be judged by the title of my patches on the subject, I consider
> -Werror to be short
On 15.05.2012 13:29, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote:
> On 14/05/12 16:44, hasufell wrote:
>> However, I don't see references to ebuild policy (in devmanual or
>> howtos) how to handle Werror.
>
> As can be judged by the title of my patches on the subject, I consider
> -Werror to be short-sighted at b
What has changed:
make.defaults of targets/desktop/ is enabling USE="udisks upower" and
NOT enabling USE="gdu"
package.use of targets/desktop/ is enabling USE="gdu" for older
gnome-base/gvfs versions (as in, stable versions)
What it means:
>=gnome-base/gvfs-1.12 will use UDisks2 instead of
As talked with him via mail, he will concentrate in hppa work and won't
have time to take care of the following packages:
net-misc/dibbler
net-misc/aiccu
Feel free to get them
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 14/05/12 16:44, hasufell wrote:
> However, I don't see references to ebuild policy (in devmanual or
> howtos) how to handle Werror.
As can be judged by the title of my patches on the subject, I consider
-Werror to be short-sighted at best and idiotic at worst. The next GCC
version, which will a
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 01:05 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> I *DON'T WANT* "a serious framework", I want a lightweight device
>> manager... period... end of story. Stick with the unix principle of one
>> app doing one thing well. mdev is eno
28 matches
Mail list logo
