On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 01:05 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
I *DON'T WANT* a serious framework, I want a lightweight device
manager... period... end of story. Stick with the unix principle of one
app doing one thing well. mdev is enough for the vast majority of people.
For the people who don't
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 01:05 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
I *DON'T WANT* a serious framework, I want a lightweight device
manager... period... end of story. Stick with the unix principle of one
app doing one thing well.
On 14/05/12 16:44, hasufell wrote:
However, I don't see references to ebuild policy (in devmanual or
howtos) how to handle Werror.
As can be judged by the title of my patches on the subject, I consider
-Werror to be short-sighted at best and idiotic at worst. The next GCC
version, which will
As talked with him via mail, he will concentrate in hppa work and won't
have time to take care of the following packages:
net-misc/dibbler
net-misc/aiccu
Feel free to get them
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
What has changed:
make.defaults of targets/desktop/ is enabling USE=udisks upower and
NOT enabling USE=gdu
package.use of targets/desktop/ is enabling USE=gdu for older
gnome-base/gvfs versions (as in, stable versions)
What it means:
=gnome-base/gvfs-1.12 will use UDisks2 instead of
On 15.05.2012 13:29, Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
On 14/05/12 16:44, hasufell wrote:
However, I don't see references to ebuild policy (in devmanual or
howtos) how to handle Werror.
As can be judged by the title of my patches on the subject, I consider
-Werror to be short-sighted at best and
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 07:29:36 Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
On 14/05/12 16:44, hasufell wrote:
However, I don't see references to ebuild policy (in devmanual or
howtos) how to handle Werror.
As can be judged by the title of my patches on the subject, I consider
-Werror to be short-sighted
Excerpts from Pacho Ramos's message of 2012-05-15 13:33:04 +0200:
net-misc/aiccu
I can take this one.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/15/2012 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
[..] net-misc/dibbler
I will take it
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:56:15AM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Greg KH gre...@gentoo.org wrote:
We learned that this is not a good idea at all, and should be left to
userspace helper applications
that listen for dbus messages.
Could you perhaps expand a
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:55:23AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 06:23:36PM -0700, Greg KH wrote
So you need to implement stuff such that you are not dependant on the
bus type. If you see a new disk, act on it, it's that simple.
But note, please do not be
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:05:57AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:56:15AM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote
I don't know at what state udev was 3 or 4 years ago, but mdev can:
1. Populate /dev (now unnecessary due to devtmpfs).
2. Handle ownership, permissions and
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Greg KH gre...@gentoo.org wrote:
I know of no such problem with udisks, have you reported them to the
upstream developers?
As I said, it's just what I hear — perhaps it's the usual retrograde
whining. I should probably just try udisks-glue, the only issue I see
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:32:57AM -0400, Olivier Cr?te wrote
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 01:05 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
I *DON'T WANT* a serious framework, I want a lightweight device
manager... period... end of story. Stick with the unix principle of one
app doing one thing well. mdev is
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:32:57AM -0400, Olivier Cr?te wrote
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 01:05 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
I *DON'T WANT* a serious framework, I want a lightweight device
manager... period... end of story.
Hi,
In case you aren't familiar with it, here's the description from the
make.conf(5) man page:
This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that
have not been modified since they were installed.
I think it would be a good idea to enable this by default, but I thought
I'd
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:55:23AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
After some more Google-searching. it looks like the official
channels way is via /etc/mdev.conf. Note that this is on a system with
busybox[mdev] and no udev.
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
What specifically is your objection to udev today? Is it doing things
you don't like? Too big? Something else?
Today, it requires an initramfs if /usr is not physically on /.
All,
I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven't updated the ChangeLog.
I got into the habbit of using repoman commit -[Mm] to do that, but for
some reason that stopped working.
I will use echangelog from this ponit until I hear that repoman commit
has been fixed.
Thanks,
William
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Stelian Ionescu wrote
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
What specifically is your objection to udev today? Is it doing things
you don't like? Too big? Something else?
I asked what I thought was a simple developer-type question. I don't
want this to become a public flamewar. If anybody wants to discuss the
issue with me further, please email directly to me and not the list.
--
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:37:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven't updated the ChangeLog.
I got into the habbit of using repoman commit -[Mm] to do that, but for
some reason that stopped working.
I will use echangelog from this ponit
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:51:03PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Stelian Ionescu wrote
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
What specifically is your objection to udev today?
Zac Medico posted on Tue, 15 May 2012 15:24:53 -0700 as excerpted:
Hi,
In case you aren't familiar with it, here's the description from the
make.conf(5) man page:
This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that
have not been modified since they were installed.
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:07 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:37:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven't updated the ChangeLog.
I got into the habbit of using repoman commit -[Mm] to do that, but for
some
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:15:28PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:07 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:37:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven't updated the ChangeLog.
I got into
On 16 May 2012 05:21, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Stelian Ionescu wrote
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
What specifically is your objection to udev today? Is
On 05/15/2012 08:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:15:28PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:07 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:37:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go
On 15/05/12 21:07, Arun Raghavan wrote:
1) Did you sleep through the /usr and initramfs flamewars?
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
You seem to have missed the bit that this has nothing at all to do with
systemd.
I guess the systemd in the url might be
29 matches
Mail list logo
