On 01-08-2012 21:00:23 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Diego mentioned the python issue.
Honestly, if some asian person has whatever charset that I often find in
spam messages, but is not UTF-8, are you then going to tell that person
to switch to UTF-8 to get those python packages emerged? I hope no
02.08.2012 04:20, Walter Dnes wrote:
> That's right... the poster was running a POSIX locale for several
> years ***AND DID NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEMS RELATED TO IT***.
This discussion is very similar with one, that i have seen in Russian
Linux community some years ago about migrating from ru_RU.KOI
Walter Dnes wrote:
> The fact that "other distros do it" does not constitute
> justification for us to do it.
Unfortunately that exact reason, along with "Fedora is doing it", was
cited by a very active developer as reason to reject technical points
which I tried to make a few times.
But that is
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> We're ignoring a very basic question here... what problems does
> shipping with a POSIX locale cause that would be fixed by setting a UTF8
> default locale??? I want a real answer. Not something along the lines
> of "But daddy, all the other k
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:29:42PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote
> Every locale is wrong for somebody; the idea was that by taking
> a survey, you could make it wrong for the least amount of people
> (by default).
Question... has anybody ever considered that maybe a POSIX locale
is wrong for th
On 08/01/2012 11:27 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:13 AM, hasufell wrote:
>> - if people want nice build _output_ (not log), they can use --quiet-build
>>
>
> ++
>
> If you're going to spam the console with 10k lines of text, what's the
> harm in spamming it with 100k? I rea
On 08/01/12 16:18, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
>>
>> If it turns out that C or POSIX is the most common response, we should
>> then default the locale to en_US.UTF-8 if we really want to default to
>> a UTF-8 setting. The reason being it makes sense to have the default
>> locale set to the country
>
> If it turns out that C or POSIX is the most common response, we should
> then default the locale to en_US.UTF-8 if we really want to default to
> a UTF-8 setting. The reason being it makes sense to have the default
> locale set to the country of origin, which in our case is the United
> State
# Hans de Graaff (1 Aug 3012)
# spruz has been superseded by dev-ruby/tins. No packages
# in the tree depend on spruz anymore.
# Removal in 30 days.
dev-ruby/spruz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
+1 for verbosity
Il giorno 01/ago/2012 13:21, "hasufell" ha scritto:
>
> We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing verbose
> build log for that which was approved:
>
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml
>
> Also we have bug https://
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:13:43 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing
> verbose build log for that which was approved:
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml
>
> Also we have bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/sho
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:13 AM, hasufell wrote:
> - if people want nice build _output_ (not log), they can use --quiet-build
>
++
If you're going to spam the console with 10k lines of text, what's the
harm in spamming it with 100k? I realize the odd package has a fairly
quiet build system, but
We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing verbose
build log for that which was approved:
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml
Also we have bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384193 and
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Quoting Maciej Grela (2012-07-31 22:31:53)
> If you'd be interested in cooperating on this please let me know.
There's Proxy Maintaining Team [0] which is better for that, but I could
do it, too.
[0] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/proxy-maintainers/index.xml
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/01/2012 11:17 AM, Maciej Grela wrote:
...
consider this handled.
- --
- --
Gentoo Dev
http://xmw.de/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iF4EAREIA
2012/8/1 Pacho Ramos :
> El mar, 31-07-2012 a las 22:31 +0200, Maciej Grela escribió:
>> 2012/7/31 Amadeusz Żołnowski :
>> > I have taken it recently, but realised I'm not going to use aiccu on
>> > Gentoo any time soon. Sorry for mess-up.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to volunteer for being a proxy ma
El mar, 31-07-2012 a las 22:31 +0200, Maciej Grela escribió:
> 2012/7/31 Amadeusz Żołnowski :
> > I have taken it recently, but realised I'm not going to use aiccu on
> > Gentoo any time soon. Sorry for mess-up.
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to volunteer for being a proxy maintainer for this package.
> I
17 matches
Mail list logo
