Am 26.09.2012 23:53, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 26.09.2012 22:43, schrieb Matt Turner:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on
Hi!
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
A different question is whether in the cases where parallel bzip2 makes
sense, is it really the best solution? xz is outperforming bzip2's
compression ratio for large files (for an informal comparison, see bug
434350). And xz is
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:43:27PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
media be replaced with
pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Michael Mol wrote:
A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the
install media be replaced with pbzip2. It was closed a short while
later, telling me that it'd involve changing what's kept in @system,
and that had to be discussed here, rather than in a
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:23 AM, wbrana wbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
Donate to support our development efforts.
Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain advertisements.
I run a technical website with around 6k visits per day, and my
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:23 PM, wbrana wbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
Donate to support our development efforts.
Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain advertisements.
You already filed a bug against infra / www asking for this, and we
wbrana wrote:
Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
Donate to support our development efforts.
Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain advertisements.
My questions are this: Does Gentoo need more money? Is it in need of
more funds to support itself?
Dale
:-) :-)
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
wbrana wrote:
Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
Donate to support our development efforts.
Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain advertisements.
My questions are this: Does Gentoo need more
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
wbrana wrote:
Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
Donate to support our development efforts.
Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
wbrana wrote:
Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
Donate to support our
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
wbrana wrote:
Am 27.09.2012 09:22, schrieb Florian Philipp:
Am 26.09.2012 23:53, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 26.09.2012 22:43, schrieb Matt Turner:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
A few months
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
The council has approved [1] Profile IUSE injection [2] for inclusion
in EAPI 5, and in latest Portage we have experimental EAPI 5_pre2 [3]
which implements all of the approved features. So, now would be a good
time to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/09/12 11:57 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Hi,
The council has approved [1] Profile IUSE injection [2] for
inclusion in EAPI 5, and in latest Portage we have experimental
As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function must be
disabled. Please review the patch included below.
Ulrich
--- eutils.eclass 15 Sep 2012 16:16:53 - 1.403
+++ eutils.eclass 27 Sep 2012 16:45:14 -
@@ -1373,7 +1373,9 @@
# @DESCRIPTION:
# If USE flag is
On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function must be
disabled. Please review the patch included below.
Ulrich
--- eutils.eclass 15 Sep 2012 16:16:53 - 1.403
+++ eutils.eclass 27 Sep 2012 16:45:14 -
@@
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/09/12 01:07 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function
must be disabled. Please review the patch included below.
Ulrich
--- eutils.eclass15 Sep
On 09/27/2012 10:07 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function must be
disabled. Please review the patch included below.
Ulrich
--- eutils.eclass15 Sep 2012 16:16:53 - 1.403
+++
On 09/27/2012 10:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/09/12 01:07 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function
must be disabled. Please review the patch included below.
Ulrich
--- eutils.eclass 15 Sep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/09/12 12:02 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/09/12 11:57 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Hi,
The council has approved [1] Profile IUSE injection [2] for
inclusion in EAPI
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:30:21AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/27/2012 10:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/09/12 01:07 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function
must be disabled. Please review
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey all -- it's been a month since 432390 was filed; and this bug is
keeping lirc-0.9.0-r2 from going stable. If nobody objects within the
next 24h or so, I'm going to apply the following patch to
toolchain-funcs.eclass to fix the bug.
The patch
On 09/27/2012 10:45 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/09/12 12:02 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/09/12 11:57 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Hi,
The council has approved [1] Profile IUSE injection [2] for
inclusion in EAPI
Alec Warner wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
wbrana wrote:
Page www.gentoo.org asks for donations
Donate to support our development efforts.
Gentoo could get more money if all *.gentoo.org would contain
advertisements.
My questions are this: Does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/09/12 01:55 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Hey all -- it's been a month since 432390 was filed; and this bug
is keeping lirc-0.9.0-r2 from going stable. If nobody objects
within the next 24h or so, I'm going to apply the following patch
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Patch committed ; timing worked out that vapier and I were on irc at
the same time, and toolchain approval was granted.
Vapier did mention (on the bug as well as in-channel) that perhaps
'tc-arch-kernel' should move to linux-info.eclass ... If
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 07:25:11PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:02:57 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:02PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
IUSE_RUNTIME is optional for PMs, why does the UI matter at all ?
Also, the proposal
On 09/27/2012 12:53 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
Bullshit. This is optional in the sense of embrace/extend 'optional';
if one PM takes up the new functionality, all have to switch to
writing unfinalized deps to the VDB, and all have to switch to
transfering that IUSE_RUNTIME crap to the VDB.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/09/12 04:13 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/27/2012 12:53 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
Bullshit. This is optional in the sense of embrace/extend
'optional'; if one PM takes up the new functionality, all have to
switch to writing unfinalized deps
On 09/27/2012 01:30 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/09/12 04:13 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/27/2012 12:53 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
Bullshit. This is optional in the sense of embrace/extend
'optional'; if one PM takes up the new functionality, all have to
switch to writing unfinalized deps
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:06 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 09/23/2012 03:59 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This looks like could be done with:
# Automerge files comprising only whitespace and/or comments
# (yes or no)
replace-wscomments=no
, setting it to yes in dispatch-conf.conf
It
On 09/27/2012 01:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:06 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 09/23/2012 03:59 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This looks like could be done with:
# Automerge files comprising only whitespace and/or comments
# (yes or no)
replace-wscomments=no
, setting it
El jue, 27-09-2012 a las 13:21 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 09/27/2012 01:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:06 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 09/23/2012 03:59 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This looks like could be done with:
# Automerge files comprising only whitespace
33 matches
Mail list logo
