Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About unresolved bugs assigned to voip for ages

2012-10-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 10-10-2012 a las 20:11 -0400, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) escribió: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn > wrote: > > Pacho Ramos schrieb: > >> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga, > >> opal, yate... are completely unattended by voip t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH/RFC] eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass: prepend-ldpath

2012-10-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 23:37:26 Gregory M. Turner wrote: > (1) is worse than (2), but it does have some quasi-legitimate usages. > For example, prefix bootstrap does this (or used to), as do many of the > crossdev-wrapper scripts. I've also resorted to such usage, myself, > when repairing a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH/RFC] eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass: prepend-ldpath

2012-10-10 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 10/10/2012 20:37, Gregory M. Turner wrote: > > If the Makefiles are building against libraries expected to be in > ${PWD}, it seems to me that the Makefiles should know to look there > automatically. Using the -L . -lfoo is a very bad style in general. Just think what happen if you're trying t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH/RFC] eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass: prepend-ldpath

2012-10-10 Thread Gregory M. Turner
On 10/9/2012 2:26 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday 06 October 2012 03:47:57 Gregory M. Turner wrote: My god, I am a horrible self-editor. Sorry. Please ignore the magnum opus above and allow me to try again. In dev-lang/python*, we use append-ldflags '-L.' to ensure linking is perf

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH/RFC] eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass: prepend-ldpath

2012-10-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 18:47:46 Gregory M. Turner wrote: > + if [[ ${CHOST} == *-cygwin* ]] ; then > + fpeconfig="--without-fpectl" just re-use myconf. this is what it's for. > + myconf="${myconf} ac_cv_func_bind_textdomain_codeset=yes" just export it:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH/RFC] eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass: prepend-ldpath

2012-10-10 Thread Gregory M. Turner
On 10/6/2012 1:31 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 06-10-2012 00:47:57 -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote: In dev-lang/python*, we use append-ldflags '-L.' to ensure linking is performed against the built libpython.so in-tree, rather than than in the one in $(libdir). But, this doesn't work if LD

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About unresolved bugs assigned to voip for ages

2012-10-10 Thread Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Pacho Ramos schrieb: >> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga, >> opal, yate... are completely unattended by voip team for >> years. If nobody from that team is willing to maintain >> them,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About unresolved bugs assigned to voip for ages

2012-10-10 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Pacho Ramos schrieb: > I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga, > opal, yate... are completely unattended by voip team for > years. If nobody from that team is willing to maintain > them, please move them to maintainer-needed to, at least, > reflect reality.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About unresolved bugs assigned to voip for ages

2012-10-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 07-10-2012 a las 08:55 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El dom, 07-10-2012 a las 12:08 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió: > > On 7 October 2012 04:37, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn > > wrote: > > > Pacho Ramos schrieb: > > >> Hello > > >> > > >> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding the tinderbox logs

2012-10-10 Thread Markos Chandras
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Actually, that happened as well. Maybe you should actually review facts > before posting sure that you know that's going on. Just saying. > Ok -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding the tinderbox logs

2012-10-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Sure. Preferences are great. Until said preferences mean that bugs that > _are_ 100% valid get closed, repeatedly, without being looked at. I can't speak to the specifics of whatever the elephant in the room is, but keep in mind that w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding the tinderbox logs

2012-10-10 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
> Nobody asked you to rollback months of work just because a few people > can't deal with the way you submit your logs. Actually somebody did, suggesting I shouldn't file bugs until the log's attached. And then proceeded to suggest that converting everything to python and using pybugz is a cakewal

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding the tinderbox logs

2012-10-10 Thread Markos Chandras
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 02/10/2012 21:14, Ryan Hill wrote: >> Well, duh. You designed, developed, and are the sole architect of the >> system. > > Not by choice... > >> You made an error in the design. You might have had good reasons at >> the time, and you