Hi all.
Since I'm running the tinderbox for Boost 1.52 on stable, and I was
looking into adding sub-slot support to my own packages, I noticed that
the three C++ TR1 virtuals are almost completely unused. The only user
is wvstreams, and only for one of them (functional).
I'm talking about:
virtu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2013 04:39 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> One of the reasons people volunteer in open source projects is to
> scratch their personal itch. When that itch develops into a festering,
> gangrenous limb it becomes time to amputate it. That is what I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2013 12:24 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100 hasufell
> wrote:
>
>> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
>
> Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
>
>> add a "unsupported-kernels" useflag, mask it, add a
Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> "getting stuff done" is not an answer.
> >
> > it made something easier for him
>
> I asked why he did it, and you keep telling me because he had to.
I'm guessing that it didn't have much to do with Gentoo. Maybe he'll
fill in.
> I am reviewing commits from time to t
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2013-03-03 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-libs/libutp 2013-02-28 10:31:02 ssuominen
dev-perl/Net-Server 2013-03-02 04:10:48 zx2c4
dev-util/qt-crea
On 03/03/13 09:11, Alec Warner wrote:
[...] My understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver
Gentoo team only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream)
support. The Kernels > 3.4 are not supported by upstream, so they
are also not supported in Gentoo. [...] There is a fear as we
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:05:28 +0100
hasufell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/03/2013 06:24 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100 hasufell
> > wrote:
> >
> >> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
> >
> > Not for conditional patching, t
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > What do we need that wrapper for? What does the wrapper do? Does it
> > just rely on custom 'ABI' variable?
>
> yes -- it must perform some checks though.
What kind of check
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> One of the reasons people volunteer in open source projects is to
> scratch their personal itch. When that itch develops into a festering,
> gangrenous limb it becomes time to amputate it. That is what I am
> doing with my involvement in x11-
Am Sonntag, 3. März 2013, 15:39:16 schrieb Doug Goldstein:
> One of the reasons people volunteer in open source projects is to
> scratch their personal itch. When that itch develops into a festering,
> gangrenous limb it becomes time to amputate it. That is what I am
> doing with my involvement in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2013 06:24 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100 hasufell
> wrote:
>
>> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
>
> Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
>
That simply diverges from reality.
# qgrep epatch |
El dom, 03-03-2013 a las 22:42 +0100, Tom Wijsman escribió:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 21:00:19 +0200
> Pavlos Ratis wrote:
>
> > I am interested in joining the herd. Now we can be 2 members. :)
>
> Added us both to the net-proxy herd and mail alias.
>
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Tom Wijsman (TomWij
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 21:00:19 +0200
Pavlos Ratis wrote:
> I am interested in joining the herd. Now we can be 2 members. :)
Added us both to the net-proxy herd and mail alias.
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
>> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
>>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
>>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>>
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>
>> Onc
One of the reasons people volunteer in open source projects is to
scratch their personal itch. When that itch develops into a festering,
gangrenous limb it becomes time to amputate it. That is what I am
doing with my involvement in x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers. As a result
someone will need to work w
Ryan Hill schrieb:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100
> hasufell wrote:
>
>> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
>
> Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
USE="vanilla" already controls conditional patching for around two dozen
packages.
>> add a "unsupported-kernels" useflag, mas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer
and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these
packages in bugzilla. This is useful in case one of the maintainers
goes MIA so we can find an alternative mai
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:00:57 +0100
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
>> As wschlich no longer has enough time for that packages, this herd is
>> now empty. If you want to help, please join the herd. If nobody
>> joins, I will proceed with dropping it and
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800
> Alec Warner wrote:
>
> > I do not find their stance wholly unreasonable. They offered to point
> > users at an overlay, if someone was willing to maintain the patches
> > there (in lieu of user_patches.) The e
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800
Alec Warner wrote:
> I do not find their stance wholly unreasonable. They offered to point
> users at an overlay, if someone was willing to maintain the patches
> there (in lieu of user_patches.) The end result is that if users apply
> the patches, they will get
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> > Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
> > > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> > >
> > >> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > >>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
>
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100
hasufell wrote:
> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
> add a "unsupported-kernels" useflag, mask it, add a clear statement in
> the masking reason and be done
If the description of the flag you're adding cou
Hey again!
Some of the packages I offered for grabs have been taken
a while ago, thanks everyone. Here are the remaining ones:
* Wolfram Schlich [2012-12-01 11:02]:
> [...]
> Feel free to take care of the following packages that I used to
> maintain a while ago but don't anymore due to change of
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >
> >> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> >>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
> >>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> Once the eclass has per-ABI heade
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >
> >> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> >>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
> >>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> Once the eclass has per-ABI heade
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
>> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
>>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
>>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
Once the eclass has per-ABI header
>>>
>>> I think this is needed.
>>>
and binaries support,
>>>
>>> but
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Carlos Silva wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:42 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>
>> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
>>
>> add a "unsupported-kernels" useflag, mask it, add a clear statement in
>> the masking reason and be done
>
>
> Not a bad solution, still, I, as
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:00:57 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> As wschlich no longer has enough time for that packages, this herd is
> now empty. If you want to help, please join the herd. If nobody
> joins, I will proceed with dropping it and moving its packages
> maintainer-needed letting everybody wa
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >>
> >> Once the eclass has per-ABI header
> >
> > I think this is needed.
> >
> >> and binaries support,
> >
> > but here, could you enlighten m
As wschlich no longer has enough time for that packages, this herd is
now empty. If you want to help, please join the herd. If nobody joins, I
will proceed with dropping it and moving its packages maintainer-needed
letting everybody want the packages they prefer.
Thanks
signature.asc
Description
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
>> and binaries support,
> but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
> why having multi binaries support would be useful.
One example is glxinfo from the mesa-progs package, it will display the
information for the ABI it is compiled with. So if you
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:42 PM, hasufell wrote:
> What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
>
> add a "unsupported-kernels" useflag, mask it, add a clear statement in
> the masking reason and be done
>
Not a bad solution, still, I, as a user, don't think making the compilation
work with a specific
After talking with serkan the following packages are now up for grabs:
x11-libs/gtkhotkey
gnome-extra/file-browser-applet
app-mobilephone/ganyremote
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>
>> Once the eclass has per-ABI header
>
> I think this is needed.
>
>> and binaries support,
>
> but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
> why having multi binaries support would b
After talking with Caster. Feel free to get it
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 3 March 2013 12:38, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>> > I explain to you what happened
>>
>> "getting stuff done" is not an answer. I still don't understand why
>> stable keywords had to be added directly. Do you understand why Mike
>> did that or just playing smart here?
>
> To me
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> Once the eclass has per-ABI header
I think this is needed.
> and binaries support,
but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
why having multi binaries support would be useful.
Alexis.
On 03/03/2013 08:11 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>
> There was a big ole' chat on #gentoo-dev regarding this. My
> understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver Gentoo team
> only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream) support. The
> Kernels > 3.4 are not supported by upstream, so t
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> To me it's obvious that he did it because it made something easier
> for him. By breaking the Gentoo rule he got something done.
Rules exist for a reason. If we're bending them because we're
accomplishing the goal of the rules in a better wa
Michał Górny schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> With the introduction of support for x32 ABI it has become necessary to
> enhance the multilib-build eclass with some kind of support for
> specifying the supported/unsupported ABIs.
>
> In this particular context, tetromino has noted that many packages
> don't
Markos Chandras wrote:
> > I explain to you what happened
>
> "getting stuff done" is not an answer. I still don't understand why
> stable keywords had to be added directly. Do you understand why Mike
> did that or just playing smart here?
To me it's obvious that he did it because it made somethi
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:41:07 +0100
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> I'd prefer the useflag names for the sake of unicity, but I'm not sure
> I understand why and how multilib-portage needs it.
Well, I mostly thought that if we were to introduce that information,
multilib-portage could use it as well rathe
On 3 March 2013 12:01, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>> > > it just feels strange
>> >
>> > I hear they call it "getting stuff done"..
>>
>> good thing you are not a dev then.
>> Thanks for the heads up in case you ever want to become one
>
> I explain to you what happened
"getting
Markos Chandras wrote:
> > > it just feels strange
> >
> > I hear they call it "getting stuff done"..
>
> good thing you are not a dev then.
> Thanks for the heads up in case you ever want to become one
I explain to you what happened and you, a recruiter, proceed to
threaten me in case I want to
If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into
testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users
could've reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you have to ignore
the rules to really fix stable, but was this such case for sure?
Dne 3.3.2013 3:43 "Mik
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 00:02:30 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With the introduction of support for x32 ABI it has become necessary
> to enhance the multilib-build eclass with some kind of support for
> specifying the supported/unsupported ABIs.
>
> In this particular context, tetromino has
On Mar 3, 2013 2:42 AM, "Peter Stuge" wrote:
>
> Markos Chandras wrote:
> > it just feels strange
>
> I hear they call it "getting stuff done"..
>
>
> //Peter
>
good thing you are not a dev then.
Thanks for the heads up in case you ever want to become one
On 2 March 2013 20:33, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 02/03/13 08:54, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>
>> The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!
>> sci-calculators/qalculator
>
>
> This project died after the first betas. I propose treecleaning it. We have
> plenty of more maintained calculators in tree.
>
If
On 2 March 2013 20:26, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> 02.03.13 07:54, Ben de Groot написав(ла):
>
>> app-admin/keepassx
>> app-text/goldendict
>
> If these two packages need a maintainer, I could proxy-maintain them.
> I'm not a developer, but I have some experience with ebuild writing.
Yes. They are
On 2 March 2013 15:57, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 02/03/2013 07:54, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> 1. Get Qt5 ready for inclusion in the tree. This includes writing and
>> improving ebuilds and eclasses, testing to build those, filing bug reports
>> on failure, finding fixes for those bugs, reporting
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800
Alec Warner wrote:
> My understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver Gentoo team
> only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream) support. The
> Kernels > 3.4 are not supported by upstream, so they are also not
> supported in Gentoo.
There is
51 matches
Mail list logo
