Tom Wijsman posted on Thu, 02 May 2013 07:09:10 +0200 as excerpted:
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
After some early issues with too much magic re preserved-libs
Why is it magic? It is well explained what it does (eg. man make.conf).
I originally would rather let the upgrades happen
gnome-games was splitted in separate packages per game and, then, we
need an eclass to also set proper settings inherited from gnome2 and
games eclasses. This should also solve:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432848
eclass and ebuild (games-puzzle/five-or-more) to try attached
#
Hi,
I've thought for a bit and got the conclusion that the best solution
for quite an irritating syntax of autotools-multilib is to use
sub-phase functions. To increase consistency between ebuilds, the same
phases can be used in autotools-utils directly.
The idea is that current ebuild looking
More details in the mail preceding the patch.
---
gx86/eclass/autotools-multilib.eclass | 47 --
gx86/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass| 157 +-
2 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gx86/eclass/autotools-multilib.eclass
On 05/02/2013 12:41 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
gnome-games was splitted in separate packages per game and, then, we
need an eclass to also set proper settings inherited from gnome2 and
games eclasses. This should also solve:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432848
eclass and ebuild
El jue, 02-05-2013 a las 14:34 +0200, hasufell escribió:
On 05/02/2013 12:41 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
gnome-games was splitted in separate packages per game and, then, we
need an eclass to also set proper settings inherited from gnome2 and
games eclasses. This should also solve:
On 05/02/2013 03:40 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 02-05-2013 a las 14:34 +0200, hasufell escribió:
On 05/02/2013 12:41 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
gnome-games was splitted in separate packages per game and, then, we
need an eclass to also set proper settings inherited from gnome2 and
games
On Wed, 1 May 2013 19:40:06 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2013 08:57:35 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Ryan Hill wrote:
Then the person implementing the code for Paludis is either a
monkey or a robot*. Anyone capable of
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Er, we are. Following the spec is not a mistake. If there's a mistake,
it was made by the Council when they approved the wording.
Both Portage and Paludis are following the spec. The spec isn't
incorrect, it
El jue, 02-05-2013 a las 15:54 +0200, hasufell escribió:
On 05/02/2013 03:40 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 02-05-2013 a las 14:34 +0200, hasufell escribió:
On 05/02/2013 12:41 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
gnome-games was splitted in separate packages per game and, then, we
need an eclass to
On 05/02/2013 05:12 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 02-05-2013 a las 15:54 +0200, hasufell escribió:
On 05/02/2013 03:40 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 02-05-2013 a las 14:34 +0200, hasufell escribió:
On 05/02/2013 12:41 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
gnome-games was splitted in separate packages per
El jue, 02-05-2013 a las 17:16 +0200, hasufell escribió:
On 05/02/2013 05:12 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 02-05-2013 a las 15:54 +0200, hasufell escribió:
On 05/02/2013 03:40 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 02-05-2013 a las 14:34 +0200, hasufell escribió:
On 05/02/2013 12:41 PM, Pacho
currently default_src_install is carried out in $BUILD_DIR and not in $S
that means people have to do something like this:
DOCS=( ${S}/ChangeLog{,.libffi,.libgcj,.v1} ${S}/README )
The attached patch is a bit ugly, but I don't see a better way. It will
allow:
DOCS=(
On Thu, 02 May 2013 18:24:19 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
currently default_src_install is carried out in $BUILD_DIR and not in $S
that means people have to do something like this:
DOCS=( ${S}/ChangeLog{,.libffi,.libgcj,.v1} ${S}/README )
The attached patch is a bit ugly, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/2013 06:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 02 May 2013 18:24:19 +0200 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
currently default_src_install is carried out in $BUILD_DIR and
not in $S
that means people have to do something like this:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Otherwise I could just use a second variable and unset DOCS.
Hm no, that would suck too, cause it will jump into the the first if
clause. I'll probably inline it all then.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment:
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 04:26:06PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
- its a consistent approach that is bootloader agnostic
- it doesn't require you to understand your bootloaders scripting system to
add it to the init= line
- its no brains required, and hard to mess up
Why should we do something
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:05 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 04:26:06PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
bootloader configuration under grub1 for instance, was quite
straight-forward. Now with grub-2, its quite convoluted, for me at least.
I haven't looked at
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you manually write your own configuration for GRUB2, it is no more
convoluted than for GRUB Legacy.
If you use grub-mkconfig to generate a configuration file, you can
append the init option by setting
Fabio Erculiani schrieb:
Not all the Gentoo users are as skilled as you (a developer). Having a
programmatic, bootloader agnostic way to swap /sbin/init is useful for
the reasons I explained. Yet I haven't read any solid reason not to do
that.
Another bootloader agnostic way is to pass
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
Not all the Gentoo users are as skilled as you (a developer). Having a
programmatic, bootloader agnostic way to swap /sbin/init is useful for
the reasons I explained. Yet I haven't read any solid reason not to do
that.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you manually write your own configuration for GRUB2, it is no more
convoluted than for GRUB Legacy.
If you use grub-mkconfig to generate a
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 03:39:25PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you manually write your own configuration for GRUB2, it is no more
convoluted
On 3 May 2013 07:01, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
If it's that simple, why on earth do we have all the eselect modules we
have!?
Hm, upon reading that list and seeing what they do, it raises another
argument in favour of eselect:
If there needs to be more things changed prior to
Mike Gilbert posted on Thu, 02 May 2013 14:13:30 -0400 as excerpted:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:05 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 04:26:06PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
bootloader configuration under grub1 for instance, was quite
straight-forward. Now with
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:27:36AM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 3 May 2013 07:01, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
If it's that simple, why on earth do we have all the eselect modules we
have!?
Hm, upon reading that list and seeing what they do, it raises another
argument
William Hubbs schrieb:
If you use this symlink approach to actually switch your init to point
to systemd, then you boot and things don't work, you are hosed.
Well, not fully hosed. You could still edit your kernel command line from
the boot loader pointing init=.. to the actual location and
Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by
packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one package where the
Makefile was being patched to remove -g from CXXFLAGS but -Werror on the same
line was left in. Just in case people weren't aware, building with
Ryan Hill wrote:
If you're fixing one of these bugs by silencing the warning be sure
to remove the flag also.
How about sending the fix upstream instead?
Thanks, from an upstream
//Peter
pgpHGm3ZpE6z3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
29 matches
Mail list logo
