On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:42:17PM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > No, I don't agree that kernel configs "belong" to kernel packages. In
> > general, barring the crazy option explosion, these are meant to be stock
> > working configs th
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 11:16:35PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> On 31/05/14 23:00, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:46:35PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> The patch in the bug is not enough. Notice
> >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828#c13
> >> Those sho
On Sat, 31 May 2014 22:42:17 +0100
Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Robin H. Johnson
> wrote:
> > No, I don't agree that kernel configs "belong" to kernel packages.
> > In general, barring the crazy option explosion, these are meant to
> > be stock working configs that s
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> No, I don't agree that kernel configs "belong" to kernel packages. In
> general, barring the crazy option explosion, these are meant to be stock
> working configs that should in combination with ANY kernel package,
> produce a working ker
On 31/05/14 23:00, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:46:35PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> The patch in the bug is not enough. Notice
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828#c13
>> Those should be reseted to "" too.
> Read what I applied, I did set it to "".
>
Thank
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 08:51:39PM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> On May 31, 2014 8:42 PM, "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > > I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
> > > ... to genkernel reposit
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:46:35PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> The patch in the bug is not enough. Notice
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828#c13
> Those should be reseted to "" too.
Read what I applied, I did set it to "".
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastruc
On May 31, 2014 8:42 PM, "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
> > ... to genkernel repository for:
> >
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
> >
> > I'l
On 31/05/14 22:41, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
>> ... to genkernel repository for:
>>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
>>
>> I'll p.mask it on a
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
> ... to genkernel repository for:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
>
> I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :(
My excuse i
On Sat, 31 May 2014 19:50:20 +0200
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> On 5/29/14, 12:46 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > In general it has always worked well after a compile; but, there's
> > every now and then one or another annoying regression, like recent
> > Chromium had some font issues or some random
On 5/29/14, 12:46 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> In general it has always worked well after a compile; but, there's every
> now and then one or another annoying regression, like recent Chromium
> had some font issues or some random tabs crash some versions ago and ...
>
> If a test catches one of these,
On 31/05/14 05:47, Steven J. Long wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:57:01AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 27/05/14 08:34, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Dnia 2014-05-26, o godz. 23:15:34
>>> Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
>>>
UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release
13 matches
Mail list logo
