On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Diamond wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:25:56 -0500
> Mike Pagano wrote:
>
>> Kernel versions are coming out 1-2 a week at this point.
>
> There's also a problem to upgrade kernel for a user every 1-2 week by
> hands using "make oldconfig" and reading smth like
> k
On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:25:56 -0500
Mike Pagano wrote:
> Are there solid arguments for stabilizing any version of
> gentoo-sources? I think the valid arguments for not stabilizing
> gentoo-sources can be garnered from the thread about not stabilizing
> vanilla-sources[1].
>
> This is in no way
On Saturday, January 03, 2015 12:39:39 AM Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> 02.01.2015 20:25, Mike Pagano пишет:
> > This is in no way complaining about how long it takes to stabilize a
> > kernel.
> As for this fact.
>
>
>
> The main problem is that: we only can test sources on machine we can
> reboot. Fo
02.01.2015 20:25, Mike Pagano пишет:
> This is in no way complaining about how long it takes to stabilize a kernel.
As for this fact.
The main problem is that: we only can test sources on machine we can
reboot. For example me and Agostino
have access to the rest hardware like alpha, ia64 and
On Friday, January 02, 2015 04:05:42 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > To summarize.
> >
> > In this instance, as this moment:
> >
> > 1. Only enter stable req bugs for 3.18 and 3.17.
>
> I assume this bit is just a transition since we don't want to
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> To summarize.
>
> In this instance, as this moment:
>
> 1. Only enter stable req bugs for 3.18 and 3.17.
I assume this bit is just a transition since we don't want to
downgrade from 3.17/18 to 3.14, and that once we get the next longterm
we'll
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:30:40 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> >> I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable
> >>
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:22:31 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 02/01/15 03:17 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:11:22 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >> On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> >>> I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto
> >>> stable m
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
>>
>> I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable
>> makes sense, because less than 7 days later, a new version with
>> bug/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/01/15 03:17 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:11:22 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
>>> I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto
>>> stable makes sense, because less
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:11:22 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable
> > makes sense, because less than 7 days later, a new version with
> > bug/security fixes is released.
> >
> > Isn't our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
>
> I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable
> makes sense, because less than 7 days later, a new version with
> bug/security fixes is released.
>
> Isn't our current rate of stabiliz
On Friday, January 02, 2015 02:18:24 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > The thing about stable gentoo-sources is that it shows that it's been
> > tested, and ideally that testing's been done against the rdeps of the
> > kernel package too (ie, exte
On Friday, January 02, 2015 01:10:21 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Resending as I replied to Ian instead of the list by accident. (sorry, Ian)
> On 02/01/15 12:25 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > Hello, Everyone,
> >
> > Are there solid arguments for stabilizing any version of
> > gentoo-sources? I thin
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> The thing about stable gentoo-sources is that it shows that it's been
> tested, and ideally that testing's been done against the rdeps of the
> kernel package too (ie, external modules). ...
> That said, given the frequency of security u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/01/15 12:25 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> Hello, Everyone,
>
> Are there solid arguments for stabilizing any version of
> gentoo-sources? I think the valid arguments for not stabilizing
> gentoo-sources can be garnered from the thread about not
>
Hello, Everyone,
Are there solid arguments for stabilizing any version of gentoo-sources? I
think the valid arguments for not stabilizing gentoo-sources can be garnered
from the thread about not stabilizing vanilla-sources[1].
This is in no way complaining about how long it takes to stabiliz
Hi,
I had some time to resolve the long outstanding issue I had with loosing
upower to systemd.
The only feature I personally had was the battery monitor stopped working,
yes, I did not install pm-utils either...
So after few times my battery went empty while I worked... decided that
enough is e
18 matches
Mail list logo
