Re: [gentoo-dev] NPM / NodeJS project

> On 2015-06-28, at 09:30, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > https://github.com/orlitzky/npm We don't > have any standalone javascript packages in the tree at the > moment but I know there's been some interest before. Is anyone still > (planning on) working on javasc

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-06-28 23:59 UTC

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2015-06-28 23:59 UTC. Removals: Additions: sci-mathematics/rw 2015-06-22 15:12:57 mjo dev-perl/Mo 2015-06-26 09:17:07 monsieurp dev-ruby/bundler-audit 2015-06-26 15:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd/project cleanup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 27.06.2015 22:20, Brian Evans wrote: > On 06/27/2015 03:39 PM, Johannes Huber wrote: >> Hello Kentoos, > >> i think this topic is overdue. Compared to the list of members >> and real activity i would love to cleanup the herd/project. > >> So ple

[gentoo-dev] Re: Herd/project cleanup

On 28/06/15 05:39, Johannes Huber wrote: > Hello Kentoos, > > i think this topic is overdue. Compared to the list of members and real > activity i would love to cleanup the herd/project. > > So please raise your hands to say "yes i want to stay part of it" or "no i am > not interested anymore".

[gentoo-dev] NPM / NodeJS project

I recently found a need for the CoffeeScript compiler[0] that runs on top of NodeJS. Its test suite requires a bunch of other javascript packages, and I wound up packaging enough of them to test CoffeeScript. In the process I wrote an eclass to handle packages hosted on the npm registry[1] and ins

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog kde5-functions.eclass kde5.eclass

Dan Douglas wrote: > for x in *; do > [[ -e $x ]] || continue > ... > done You should also test for $x not being a symlink. Otherwise you can miss the corner case that you have a dead/unresolvable symlink called "*".

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog kde5-functions.eclass kde5.eclass

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 14:46:01 +0200 > Patrice Clement wrote: > >> man 3 glob >> man 3 fnmatch >> man 1 bash -> read the section called "Pattern Matching" under >> "EXPANSION". >> >> in this case, $(ls) would unnecessarily spawn a subshell f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog kde5-functions.eclass kde5.eclass

On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 14:46:01 +0200 Patrice Clement wrote: > man 3 glob > man 3 fnmatch > man 1 bash -> read the section called "Pattern Matching" under > "EXPANSION". > > in this case, $(ls) would unnecessarily spawn a subshell for listing > files. You can often get the same result by using wild

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog kde5-functions.eclass kde5.eclass

man 3 glob man 3 fnmatch man 1 bash -> read the section called "Pattern Matching" under "EXPANSION". in this case, $(ls) would unnecessarily spawn a subshell for listing files. You can often get the same result by using wildcard expansion (or globbing) like Michal said: for lang in *; do ...

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog kde5-functions.eclass kde5.eclass

On Sunday 28 June 2015 04:12:01 Michał Górny wrote: > > + for lang in $(ls) ; do > > How about... for lang in *? What is the advantage? Greetings -- Johannes Huber (johu) Gentoo Linux Developer / KDE Team GPG Key ID FDF4F788 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sig