Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] ebuild.sh: Completely ban external commands in global scope

> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Robin H Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:45:42PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> +export PATH=/dev/null > Minor nitpick: The Single UNIX spec says that PATH is a set of > prefixes, and that they're treated as directories. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Server hardaware give away (misc archs)

- On 7 Sep, 2017, at 10:53 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wlt...@o-sinc.com wrote: > > In an ideal sense, equipment like this would go to something like OSU > OSL or some other hosting provider. Though there is the cost of > bandwidth, power, and man power to service hardware issues. Not to >

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/cryptlib masked for removal in 30 days

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 8 September 2017 at 22:44, R0b0t1 wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >> > Complex build system, hard to maintain, no dependencies in tree, upstream >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:33 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: >> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:11:51 -0500 >> R0b0t1 wrote: >> >>> Then I'm quite confused as to why people seem to be extremely attentive to >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:11:51 -0500 > R0b0t1 wrote: > >> Then I'm quite confused as to why people seem to be extremely attentive to >> copyright infringement (besides an immediate payout). In the US they

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow

On 09/08/2017 11:19 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > FYI - if anybody does want to make any comments on the proposed > devmanual changes to implement the new tags please comment at: > > https://github.com/gentoo/devmanual.gentoo.org/pull/72 > > For that matter, if you want to even know what the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] ebuild.sh: Completely ban external commands in global scope

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:45:42PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > + export PATH=/dev/null Minor nitpick: The Single UNIX spec says that PATH is a set of prefixes, and that they're treated as directories. http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xbd/envvar.html I think it might be good to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass vim-runtime

DEPENDS part and "binary" function makes me sad panda: they assumes there are no "vims" exist, while there is at least `vim-qt` (well, actually that one is dropped from gentoo) and `neovim-qt` (and that one is in overlays, but anyway), and so on. I think, it'd be nice to somehow avoid exact

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass vim-runtime

This is really messy at the moment because I'm not sure whether the vim team is interested, and I didn't want to put in the effort if it's just going to be rejected, but I'm posting what I have here to start some kind of discussion. At the moment functions/other things need to be described, among

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] toolchain-funcs: Respect host vars for tc-getBUILD* when not cross

On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:33:11 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Make tc-getBUILD* functions respect host variables (CC & co.) when > not cross-compiling. This removes the necessity of overriding BUILD_* > along with the regular variables on the systems that are not concerned > about

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > What do you think about it? Is there anything else that needs being > covered? > FYI - if anybody does want to make any comments on the proposed devmanual changes to implement the new tags please comment at:

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/cryptlib masked for removal in 30 days

On 8 September 2017 at 22:44, R0b0t1 wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > Complex build system, hard to maintain, no dependencies in tree, upstream > > does not cooperate (Bug#630420). > > Removal in 30 days. > > > > I don't have

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/cryptlib masked for removal in 30 days

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Complex build system, hard to maintain, no dependencies in tree, upstream > does not cooperate (Bug#630420). > Removal in 30 days. > I don't have any reason to disagree with this but I expected a citation for those things

[gentoo-dev] dev-libs/cryptlib masked for removal in 30 days

Complex build system, hard to maintain, no dependencies in tree, upstream does not cooperate (Bug#630420). Removal in 30 days.

[gentoo-dev] sys-auth/pam_pkcs11 masked for removal in 30 days

Upstream no longer maintain (Bug#628908). Removal in 30 days.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] ebuild.sh: Completely ban external commands in global scope

Must be old age setting in :( Thanks, -A On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu pią, 08.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶48 -0400, użytkownik Alec Warner > napisał: > > Why PATH=/dev/null vs export PATH="" > > + # note: we can't use empty because it implies

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] ebuild.sh: Completely ban external commands in global scope

W dniu pią, 08.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶48 -0400, użytkownik Alec Warner napisał: > Why PATH=/dev/null vs export PATH="" + # note: we can't use empty because it implies current directory > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Dnia 31 sierpnia 2017

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Ciaran McCreesh < ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:10:54 -0500 > Gordon Pettey wrote: > > And this is all irrelevant since the copyright applies to the > > software, not the location you obtain it from. Nobody

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:10:54 -0500 Gordon Pettey wrote: > Distribution licenses are another thing, but if the original SRC_URI from > the ebuild wasn't RESTICT="fetch", what makes anybody think that would > suddenly change with a new SRC_URI? I've seen terms that state

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:10:54 -0500 Gordon Pettey wrote: > And this is all irrelevant since the copyright applies to the > software, not the location you obtain it from. Nobody commits > copyright infringement by buying a used book from their neighbour > instead of buying it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

And this is all irrelevant since the copyright applies to the software, not the location you obtain it from. Nobody commits copyright infringement by buying a used book from their neighbour instead of buying it at Half Price Books. Distribution licenses are another thing, but if the original

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 03:56:38 +1200 Kent Fredric wrote: > > >> Sir, please see my above comment about building ballistic > > >> missiles. It may be important for the Gentoo Foundation to add a > > >> disclaimer similar to the one I mentioned. I would hate for the > > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:11:51 -0500 R0b0t1 wrote: > Then I'm quite confused as to why people seem to be extremely attentive to > copyright infringement (besides an immediate payout). In the US they cite > the reasoning I gave, from memory. > > Maybe that was for trademarks?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

On Friday, September 8, 2017, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, R0b0t1 wrote: > >> Downloading does not imply committing a felony. As far as anyone can >> tell it is impossible to prosecute someone for downloading something >> they already own (regardless of what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Categories for GUI stuff x11 and wayland

On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:01:08 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > This is more food for thought to start a discussion on new category > names. With Wayland becoming more of a reality every day. I think some > of the x11-* categories may need to change. Stuff in there may

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] eapi7-ver.eclass: 'Early adopter' version of EAPI 7 version manip

> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:54:10 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: >> It only explains how the functions parse stuff (except for ver_test >> which uses PMS rules). They are by definition supposed to work with >> random upstream

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eapi7-ver.eclass: 'Early adopter' version of EAPI 7 version manip

> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > +# A version component can either consist purely of digits ([0-9]+) or > +# purely of uppercase and lowercase letters ([a-zA-Z]+). Any other > +# character is treated as a version separator. Minor documentation nitpick (sorry for not noticing this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] eapi7-ver.eclass: 'Early adopter' version of EAPI 7 version manip

On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:54:10 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu pią, 08.09.2017 o godzinie 12∶48 +, użytkownik Martin Vaeth > napisał: > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > +# 1.2b-alpha4 -> 1 . 2 '' b - alpha '' 4 > > > > Is this only to explain the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] eapi7-ver.eclass: 'Early adopter' version of EAPI 7 version manip

W dniu pią, 08.09.2017 o godzinie 12∶48 +, użytkownik Martin Vaeth napisał: > Michał Górny wrote: > > +# 1.2b-alpha4 -> 1 . 2 '' b - alpha '' 4 > > Is this only to explain the syntax or are there plans to > extend the allowed versions for pms? > It only explains how

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libclc/

W dniu pią, 08.09.2017 o godzinie 12∶38 +, użytkownik Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn napisał: > commit: 87929d9f6bfe62770cb13547583425e6f2755a59 > Author: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Fri Sep 8 12:38:21 2017 + > Commit: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] eapi7-ver.eclass: 'Early adopter' version of EAPI 7 version manip

Michał Górny wrote: > +# 1.2b-alpha4 -> 1 . 2 '' b - alpha '' 4 Is this only to explain the syntax or are there plans to extend the allowed versions for pms? There is a reason why pms currently does not allow "-" as separators within versions (with the exception of -r):

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eapi7-ver.eclass: 'Early adopter' version of EAPI 7 version manip

EAPI 7 is introducing new version manipulation and comparison functions that aim to replace versionator.eclass. This eclass provides an 'early adopter' versions of those routines. It serves two goals: a. getting wider review and some real-life testing before the specification is set in stone,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > Quoting from "all-rights-reserved": > > | This package has an explicit "all rights reserved" clause, or comes > | without any license, or only with a disclaimer. This means that you > | have only the rights that are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 16∶42 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman >> napisał: >>> Are you saying it is sufficient to just point the SRC_URI at the >>> new URL and remove

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Maybe find yourself a lawyer, and ask him. We're all volunteers, I've already done the research. There is no legal requirement to contact the authors before changing the SRC_URI. > and we're no in way obligated to give

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, R0b0t1 wrote: > Downloading does not imply committing a felony. As far as anyone can > tell it is impossible to prosecute someone for downloading something > they already own (regardless of what any EULA has claimed). Sure, if the user already has rightfully obtained

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain-funcs: Respect host vars for tc-getBUILD* when not cross

Make tc-getBUILD* functions respect host variables (CC & co.) when not cross-compiling. This removes the necessity of overriding BUILD_* along with the regular variables on the systems that are not concerned about cross-compilation, and does not change the behavior for those which are. Closes:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-rpg/nwn-shadowlordsdreamcatcherdemon

W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 17∶56 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman napisał: > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 16∶42 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman > > napisał: > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Michał Górny