Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: sys-process/parallel

2017-10-28 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 28/10/17 22:02, Jonas Stein wrote: > Dear all, > > The following packages are up for grabs: > > sys-process/parallel > > after retirement of the proxied maintainer. > (https://bugs.gentoo.org/633090) > > https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-process/parallel > > The ebuild was defacto

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: sys-process/parallel

2017-10-28 Thread Jonas Stein
Dear all, The following packages are up for grabs: sys-process/parallel after retirement of the proxied maintainer. (https://bugs.gentoo.org/633090) https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-process/parallel The ebuild was defacto maintained by several gentoo developers who kept the package up

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files

2017-10-28 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu sob, 28.10.2017 o godzinie 15∶46 +0200, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > > W dniu sob, 28.10.2017 o godzinie 14∶49 +0200, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller > > napisał: > > > Other tools like "find" don't special-case dot-prefixed files > > >

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-text/rnv

2017-10-28 Thread Jonas Stein
Dear all, The following packages are up for grabs: app-text/rnv after retirement of the proxied maintainer. (https://bugs.gentoo.org/632784) https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-text/rnv The ebuild makes repoman sad KEYWORDS.dropped 1 app-text/rnv/rnv-1.7.11-r1.ebuild:

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/whirlpool

2017-10-28 Thread Mike Gilbert
# Mike Gilbert (28 Oct 2017) # Tests segfault, bug 635732. # No updates upstream since 2013. # Removal in 30 days. dev-python/whirlpool

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files

2017-10-28 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 01:50:46PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > A SVN or Git repo might also have dot-named directories. > I like the implicit idea better as it is more consistent with normal > tool behavior, like 'ls' not listing the files. Dotfiles can be created > by many random tools or even

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files

2017-10-28 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu sob, 28.10.2017 o godzinie 14∶49 +0200, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller > napisał: >> Other tools like "find" don't special-case dot-prefixed files >> though (in fact, "ls" may well be the exception there). >> >> Implicit ignores only create an

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files

2017-10-28 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu sob, 28.10.2017 o godzinie 14∶49 +0200, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > The Manifest files can also specify ``IGNORE`` entries to skip > > > > Manifest verification of subdirectories and/or files. Files and > > > > directories

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files

2017-10-28 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, Michał Górny wrote: >> > The Manifest files can also specify ``IGNORE`` entries to skip >> > Manifest verification of subdirectories and/or files. Files and >> > directories starting with a dot are always implicitly ignored. >> > All files that are not ignored must be

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files

2017-10-28 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu pią, 27.10.2017 o godzinie 21∶05 +, użytkownik Robin H. Johnson napisał: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > 2. Alike the original Manifest2, the files should be split into two > >groups — files whose authenticity is critical, and those whose > >