On Sun, 2020-04-05 at 22:13 +0100, Marek Szuba wrote:
> On 2020-04-02 15:31, Marek Szuba wrote:
>
> > 3. Test if downstream applications are happy with the new unified OpenCL
> > headers required by the Khronos Group ICD loader and if they are, add
> > dev-libs/opencl-icd-loader to virtual/opencl
No longer use it.
Needs a minor bump, upstream changed doc dependency to asciidoctor.
Uses custom build system and rust,
may be tricky to maintain, but I can help.
Couple of open bugs: arm keywording and musl related build falure.
net-news/newsboat
--
Georgy Yakovlev
pgpTpfceqLlmO.pgp
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2020-04-05 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-go/ed25519 20200403-18:53 marecki
6a02720bdc2
dev-libs/yaml-cpp 20200403-02:12 chutzpah
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 17:20:07 +
Peter Stuge wrote:
> James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > Damn, I realised just as I hit send that there's a caveat here and
> > that's sub-dependencies. If you're building a partially static binary
> > then I think you're okay. A fully static binary obviously needs all
On 2020-04-02 15:31, Marek Szuba wrote:
> 3. Test if downstream applications are happy with the new unified OpenCL
> headers required by the Khronos Group ICD loader and if they are, add
> dev-libs/opencl-icd-loader to virtual/opencl as an alternative to ocl-icd;
Quick update on this: today I
On 2020-04-05 06:44, Michał Górny wrote:
>> +EAPI=6
> Is there really a good reason to use an old EAPI here?
None other than me having assumed that there must have been an important
reason why such a simple ebuild had not been bumped to EAPI 7 yet. Will
change this in the next iteration.
>>
James Le Cuirot wrote:
> Damn, I realised just as I hit send that there's a caveat here and
> that's sub-dependencies. If you're building a partially static binary
> then I think you're okay. A fully static binary obviously needs all its
> dependencies to be static and that includes any
On 2020-04-04 15:57, Kent Fredric wrote:
> Depends how concerned you are about VM busting exploits contaminating
> the host.
>
> ( Maybe not Zoom in particular, but with regard to the general theme of
> "risky apps on a valued system" )
Sorry about my comment, but couldn't that be solved choosing
On 4/5/20 5:54 AM, Joonas Niilola wrote:
# Not maintained in Gentoo, doesn't build for 2 years, has only
# deprecated version present in Gentoo. Has a huge number of open
# bugs. Removal in 30 days. #642952
www-misc/zoneminder
This appears to be an active project. There is a plugin for
No it doesn't. Where's the bootstrap toolchain you need to build?
On 03/04/2020 07:48, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:25:35 +0200
> Tupone Alfredo wrote:
>
>> ---
>> eclass/toolchain.eclass | 25 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
# Not maintained in Gentoo, doesn't build for 2 years, has only
# deprecated version present in Gentoo. Has a huge number of open
# bugs. Removal in 30 days. #642952
www-misc/zoneminder
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
11 matches
Mail list logo
