[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: x11-misc/xpad

2022-03-10 Thread Jonas Stein
Dear all the following packages are up for grabs after dropping desktop-misc: x11-misc/xpad https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/x11-misc/xpad A version bump is needed https://bugs.gentoo.org/834946 -- Best, Jonas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 3/10/2022 14:58, Alec Warner wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:27 AM Joshua Kinard wrote: >> >> On 3/9/2022 16:00, Matt Turner wrote: >>> I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that >>> dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from app-portage/mgorny-dev-scripts) >>> are far

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread Sam James
> On 10 Mar 2022, at 21:57, Joshua Kinard wrote: >> >> I'd be interested in hearing your workflow, so we can capture it in >> the table (mentioned earlier) so its clear how your existing workflow >> will work with the new tools (or perhaps there is a gap, or we need to >> craft / add

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread John Helmert III
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 04:53:10PM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 3/10/2022 14:44, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > >>> > >>> I wouldn't block anyone from doing this, but it's not something I'm > >>> personally interested in pursuing. I see very little value here. > >> > >> First, you're trying to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 3/10/2022 14:59, Alec Warner wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:28 AM Joshua Kinard wrote: >> >> On 3/9/2022 16:47, Matt Turner wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:37 PM Matthias Maier wrote: Just a quick though: Looking at the man page of repoman it doesn't look to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 3/10/2022 14:44, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >>> >>> I wouldn't block anyone from doing this, but it's not something I'm >>> personally interested in pursuing. I see very little value here. >> >> First, you're trying to justify replacing repoman on an entirely subjective >> opinion of "I think

[gentoo-dev] [POC PATCH] go-module.eclass: remove deprecated code

2022-03-10 Thread William Hubbs
This is not being merged. I am posting it now to show how I want the eclass to change after the usage of EGO_SUM is removed from the tree. I will re-post before I merge. --- eclass/go-module.eclass | 359 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 354 deletions(-)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread Alec Warner
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:28 AM Joshua Kinard wrote: > > On 3/9/2022 16:47, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:37 PM Matthias Maier wrote: > >> > >> > >> Just a quick though: > >> > >> Looking at the man page of repoman it doesn't look to difficult to > >> replicate the behavior

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread Alec Warner
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:27 AM Joshua Kinard wrote: > > On 3/9/2022 16:00, Matt Turner wrote: > > I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that > > dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from app-portage/mgorny-dev-scripts) > > are far superior replacements, and it makes sense

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> > > > I wouldn't block anyone from doing this, but it's not something I'm > > personally interested in pursuing. I see very little value here. > > First, you're trying to justify replacing repoman on an entirely subjective > opinion of "I think is superior" ... Well, if you've ever tried it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 3/9/2022 16:47, Matt Turner wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:37 PM Matthias Maier wrote: >> >> >> Just a quick though: >> >> Looking at the man page of repoman it doesn't look to difficult to >> replicate the behavior with pkgcheck. Meaning, we could think of >> creating a drop-in replacement

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 3/9/2022 16:00, Matt Turner wrote: > I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that > dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from app-portage/mgorny-dev-scripts) > are far superior replacements, and it makes sense to have people using > the same tool and seeing the same warnings

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread John Helmert III
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:07:40PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:29:59AM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:09 PM Joonas Niilola wrote: > > > > > > On 9.3.2022 23.00, Matt Turner wrote: > > > > I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:29:59AM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:09 PM Joonas Niilola wrote: > > > > On 9.3.2022 23.00, Matt Turner wrote: > > > I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that > > > dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-10 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:09 PM Joonas Niilola wrote: > > On 9.3.2022 23.00, Matt Turner wrote: > > I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that > > dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from app-portage/mgorny-dev-scripts) > > are far superior replacements, and it makes sense

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v5] go-module.eclass: deprecate EGO_SUM

2022-03-10 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 01:10:46PM +0100, tastytea wrote: > On 2022-03-05 16:17-0600 William Hubbs wrote: > > > +# @CODE > > +# > > +# $ cd /path/to/project > > +# $ GOMODCACHE="${PWD}"/go-mod go mod download -modcacherw > > +# $ tar -acf project-1.0-deps.tar.xz go-mod > > What's the reason to