On 3/11/2022 20:57, Sam James wrote:
>
>
>> On 10 Mar 2022, at 23:18, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>>
>> On 3/10/2022 14:58, Alec Warner wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:27 AM Joshua Kinard wrote:
On 3/9/2022 16:00, Matt Turner wrote:
> I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove rep
On 3/11/2022 20:54, Sam James wrote:
>
>
>> On 11 Mar 2022, at 19:39, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>>
>> On 3/11/2022 03:54, Mart Raudsepp wrote:> Ühel kenal päeval, N, 10.03.2022
>> kell 18:18, kirjutas Joshua Kinard:
I stick to the officially-published method of checking and committing
chang
# Sam James (2022-03-11)
# No maintainer, out of date, stuck on deprecated
# (and soon-to-stop-working) cmake-utils. bug #774480.
# Removal on 2022-04-11.
dev-libs/processor-trace
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On 10 Mar 2022, at 23:18, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
> On 3/10/2022 14:58, Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:27 AM Joshua Kinard wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/9/2022 16:00, Matt Turner wrote:
I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that
dev-util/pkgcheck an
> On 11 Mar 2022, at 17:14, Peter Stuge wrote:
> [snip]
> Looking into the future then maybe portage could even come to use
> pkgcore for the low-level things that pkgcore does, then even users
> could enjoy improved performance.
>
Are you volunteering to work on this substantial task?
sign
> On 11 Mar 2022, at 19:39, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
> On 3/11/2022 03:54, Mart Raudsepp wrote:> Ühel kenal päeval, N, 10.03.2022
> kell 18:18, kirjutas Joshua Kinard:
>>> I stick to the officially-published method of checking and committing
>>> changes:
>>> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-ma
> On 11 Mar 2022, at 19:51, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
> On 3/11/2022 13:25, Alec Warner wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>> The new workflow with pkgcheck was announced at the end of 2019:
>> https://blogs.gentoo.org/mgorny/2019/12/12/a-better-ebuild-workflow-with-pure-git-and-pkgcheck
>>
>> It's been 2
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:43 PM Francesco Riosa wrote:
>
> Il giorno mer 9 mar 2022 alle ore 22:01 Matt Turner ha
> scritto:
>>
>> I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that
>> dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from app-portage/mgorny-dev-scripts)
>
>
> Hi using `repoman
Il giorno mer 9 mar 2022 alle ore 22:01 Matt Turner
ha scritto:
> I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that
> dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from app-portage/mgorny-dev-scripts)
>
Hi using `repoman manifest` in scripts here, what would be the correct
replacement for
I've filed a PR against devmanual.git to remove references to repoman
and replace them with references to pkgdev where appropriate. Most
everywhere already had pkgdev/pkgcheck text in place so there wasn't
much to do. See: https://github.com/gentoo/devmanual/pull/274
On 11/03/2022 21.51, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 3/11/2022 13:25, Alec Warner wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>> The new workflow with pkgcheck was announced at the end of 2019:
>> https://blogs.gentoo.org/mgorny/2019/12/12/a-better-ebuild-workflow-with-pure-git-and-pkgcheck
>>
>> It's been 2 years, I think
On 3/11/2022 13:25, Alec Warner wrote:
[snip]
>
> The new workflow with pkgcheck was announced at the end of 2019:
> https://blogs.gentoo.org/mgorny/2019/12/12/a-better-ebuild-workflow-with-pure-git-and-pkgcheck
>
> It's been 2 years, I think we can bring everyone into the fold here.
I've sear
On 3/11/2022 03:54, Mart Raudsepp wrote:> Ühel kenal päeval, N, 10.03.2022
kell 18:18, kirjutas Joshua Kinard:
>> I stick to the officially-published method of checking and committing
>> changes:
>> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-maintenance/git/index.html
>>
>> The two tools highlighted there
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022, Alec Warner wrote:
> I'm not sure a news item is strictly necessary, we might just p.mask
> repoman with a link to the guide that Matt will need to write about
> how repoman is being replaced.
We should distinguish between deprecating the repoman(-only) workflow
and dep
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:25:19 -0800
Alec Warner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 9:14 AM Peter Stuge wrote:
> >
> > Matt Turner wrote:
> > > repoman is inferior to other tooling mentioned. The other tooling
> > > is actually run in CI.
> >
> > The problem seems to be that CI is running someth
dev-lang/elixir is up for grabs due to the proxied-maintainer being
inactive.
It is currently up-to-date and has no outstanding bugs.
net-fs/s3fs is up grabs due to the proxied-maintainer being inactive.
It is currently up-to-date and has no outstanding bugs.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 9:14 AM Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> Matt Turner wrote:
> > repoman is inferior to other tooling mentioned. The other tooling is
> > actually run in CI.
>
> The problem seems to be that CI is running something other than
> developers run, not the other way around.
>
>
> > Develop
Matt Turner wrote:
> repoman is inferior to other tooling mentioned. The other tooling is
> actually run in CI.
The problem seems to be that CI is running something other than
developers run, not the other way around.
> Developers should get the same warnings locally as in CI.
I agree. And deve
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:07:40 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:29:59AM -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:09 PM Joonas Niilola
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9.3.2022 23.00, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > > I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman.
# Sam James (2022-03-11)
# Significant number of open bugs including unaddressed security issues;
# out of date; stuck on deprecated (and soon-to-stop-working) cmake-utils
# eclass. See bug #834113. Removal on 2022-04-11.
dev-db/mysql-cluster
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPG
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 10.03.2022 kell 18:18, kirjutas Joshua Kinard:
> I stick to the officially-published method of checking and committing
> changes:
> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-maintenance/git/index.html
>
> The two tools highlighted there for the bulk of the work is repoman
> and pkg
22 matches
Mail list logo
