On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> In terms of goals, [1] is what I'd consider to be an ideal list.
One thing I would personally add to the list is to somehow be able to
set certain packages not to update more than x often. There are some
packages which users care about wh
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:22:16 +0100
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> But in comment 4 user ask about updates itself. If we have live
>> package and revision does not change it is pointless waste of
>> resources to recompile it usualy.
> * Allowi
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This new RESTRICT=live value would be useful in at least a couple of
> ways. One is that it could be used to implement a @live-rebuild
> package set that's based on RESTRICT instead of INHERITED [1]. It
> could also be used to
On 1/11/08, Bernd Steinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is sth. that has been brought up in the KDE4 forums thread and on
> irc. The thing is, that if you're using a live ebuild you might very
> likely run into bugs, that have been introduced in a newer revision.
> Now when you get
