On 01/03/2017 09:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:24:19 AM EST Damien LEVAC wrote:
On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2
On 01/03/2017 09:31 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote:
IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it
heavily depends on wireless-tools a
On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07)
gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote:
IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it
heavily depe
On 2016-06-02 05:27 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 06/02/2016 12:57 PM, Damien Levac wrote:
On 2016-06-02 03:42 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:31:11AM -0400, Damien Levac wrote
IMHO, you see this in reverse. the 'gui' useflag would be useful for
users
On 2016-06-02 03:42 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:31:11AM -0400, Damien Levac wrote
IMHO, you see this in reverse. the 'gui' useflag would be useful for
users who don't want to care about X/wayland/mir and do not want to care
about gtk/qt, they ju
On 2016-06-01 10:13 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:56:41PM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote
waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
I see this as at least a redundancy, if not a problem. First, let's
look at the general case. An optional "UI" (User Interface) is also
select
On 2016-06-01 11:19 AM, NP-Hardass wrote:
On 06/01/2016 10:29 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Hello,
So here's something more simple wrt GUI USE flags.
Global USE=gui for
gui - enable an optional graphics user interface or extra GUI tool
Essentially, if it's an optional GUI, it'd be behind a USE=gu
On 05/04/2016 11:41 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 04/05/16 02:01 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 4 May 2016 at 16:46, Matt Turner wrote:
Having built many stages for an "unstable" arch (mips) has taught me
one thing: it's awful being unstable-only. There's no end to the
compilation failures and
> Seriously... how many people run Bluetooth keyboards on Gentoo >anyways?
That you ask such a question is concerning to me. Are we discriminating
against normal desktop users now?
--
Damien Levac
7;t already successful with it without
the merge though.
--
Damien Levac
sense of the OS ..
/usr/sbin still exists in a merged usr, so I don't get that point...
>*hides in his bike-shed, awaiting the flaming torches*
Don't worry: no troll here.
--
Damien Levac
t merging things into /usr is a major policy >>
decision that is likely to contravene upstream installation
>> locations. I wouldn't do it lightly, if at all.
--
Damien Levac
On 14-03-24 12:28 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:55:38 -0400
Damien Levac wrote:
A lot of people already replied to this question: package search.
Sure, but can you point to prior examples of this kind of stuff
actually working?
I have no example for package searching
On 14-03-24 10:25 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:36:19 +0100
Jan Matejka wrote:
Categories are essentially tags, only less powerful as they can
express relationship of 1:N while tags are can express M:N
No, categories are essentially directories.
I was asking about tags, no
+1
I was an user very interested by the bug day event, but the timing was
never right. A permanent effort where everyone can help whenever they
can seems more interesting. The only thing needed then is documentation
on exactly what can be done by users with varying skills.
Damien
On 11/16/2013 0
Just a user point of view:
When a user decide to restrict the packages on his system to "stable", I
think the user expect stability in the sense works properly under most
(if not all) situations.
Therefore, for a user, if real stability demand a lot of restriction, it
is a price to pay. I think it
As a user, I have always wondered what was the rational for the current
game categories and thought it should splitted in a more standard way.
What immediately comes to mind as a "decent" way to split games is the
wikipedia page for video game genres:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_genres
This is funny, because after replying to the list, I actually wrote
myself a script to extract that manual from the website into pdf. I
should start reading soon... after my other book... xD
Damien
On 12/16/12 17:34, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 16-12-2012 a las 12:49 -0500, Damien Le
I completely agree, myself, I want to become a developer, but since the
information looks so scattered, I decided to wait until summer to have
all the required time to find/read all relevant documentation and
foillow up with the recruitment process (which seems to be somehow
'non-trivial').
As an
19 matches
Mail list logo
