On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:26:10 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> - Currently, we have to skip over certain file systems that we can't
> unmount during shutdown. With the new approach, if the mount script
> mounts a file system during boot, it will be able to unmount the
> same filesystem during shut
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:32:34 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> Swap is horrifically slow. It's better to fail than to use swap for
> stuff...
>
Is it better to fail when you have already lost several hours in
compilations? Or is it better to use some additional parallel swap on a
bunch of HDDs o
On Fri, 15 May 2015 08:23:27 -0700
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
> > Starting with Portage 2.2.19, a new SquashDelta syncing method has
> > been introduced. It is meant to provide lightweight and efficient
> > solution for stable systems. The who
On Sat, 09 May 2015 02:05:58 +0600
"Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" wrote:
> I'd also prefer, but it is not that possible as you imagine. There is
> such thing as certification in Federal Security Service (FSB) and so
> on. And there is only two such distributions: Alt Linux and Rosa
> Linux (if not t
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 05:33:44 +0200
Yanestra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after a talk with some of the persons present here, it appears, Gentoo
> Linux is actually something like a Freemason lodge.
>
> Many secrets, inaugurations, and obviously magic.
>
> People, I can only conclude you are not sane.
>
>
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:57:45 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> The Gentoo tree is not verified anyway: mirrors distribute it via
> http, rsync and ftp. And using https for that will create a
> tremendous stress on mirror's CPUs, so this is a bad approach.
> Not to mention that https itself is very
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:41:33 +0200
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> For the current Gentoo Git setup I found these methods working for
> accessing a repository, betagarden in this case:
>
> git://anongit.gentoo.org/proj/betagarden.git
> (git://git.gentoo.org/proj/betagarden.git)
> (git
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:44:28 +0100
hasufell wrote:
> So if a project ignores the community, the council, the QA team AND
> violates GLEP39, we allow that, because they still do commits?
It looks like I can't edit
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Games/Ebuild_howto, is it a bug?
gamesenv func
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 08:36:54 -0800
Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > 1. Why autosync is disabled by default? This broke current
> > default for emerge --sync. And if users added overlays, they
> > most definitely want them to by synced by default as well.
> > So I propose to set auto-sync=yes by default.
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:45:34 -0600
Ben Kohler wrote:
>
> I think this should be in an ebuild. You mentioned that it's only
> needed ONCE, but it's needed ONCE for everytime one install gentoos,
> along the same lines as mirrorselect. A couple of years from now, do
> we want users to have to di
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:28:27 -0600
Gordon Pettey wrote:
>
>
> Because Intel and AMD support it via different cpuinfo feature names.
> It is popcnt on Intel, and abm on AMD. The description of the flag
> should also mention that it is included in feature "abm" on AMD CPUs
> (and Intel CPUs, but
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:44:05 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to commit the following flags as cpu_flags_x86_desc.
> The list combines global USE flags with some local USE flags I've been
> able to find.
>
>
> 3dnow - Use the 3DNow! instruction set
> 3dnowext - Use the Enhan
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:13:46 +0800
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >
> > 3dnow - Use the 3DNow! instruction set
> > 3dnowext - Use the Enhanced 3DNow! instruction set
>
> Those are kinda mostly dead (no new CPUs have them anymore)
>
My CPU still has them.
>
> > mmxext - Use the Extended MMX instruc
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 01:16:57 +0400
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> It should be noted that at least in Linux skype is much harder to
> install and use since it requires pulseaudio and I don't use
> that sh^W stuff. So skype reqires its own LXC container set up
> which is doable, but costed me a day (wi
On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:25:56 -0500
Mike Pagano wrote:
> Are there solid arguments for stabilizing any version of
> gentoo-sources? I think the valid arguments for not stabilizing
> gentoo-sources can be garnered from the thread about not stabilizing
> vanilla-sources[1].
>
> This is in no way
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:44:21 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-12-11, o godz. 11:36:29
> Michał Górny napisał(a):
>
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > Following a similar change in distutils-r1, I would like to remove
> > the parallel run support in multilib eclasses, and effectively from
> > mu
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:05:31 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> Regarding the gkrellm-plugins, looks like Fedora is supplying this
> one:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gkrellm-freq.git/tree/gkrellm-freq.spec
>
>
I rewrote ebuild for gkrellm-gkfreq plugin a bit
https://github.com/cerebru
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:05:31 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> Regarding the gkrellm-plugins, looks like Fedora is supplying this
> one:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gkrellm-freq.git/tree/gkrellm-freq.spec
>
>
I recreated gkrellm-gkfreq-2.3.ebuild in my overlay
https://github.com/cerebrum/d
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:05:31 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 08-12-2014 a las 14:46 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió:
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Michael Orlitzky
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > It doesn't look like it's going to work so well without
> > > cpufrequtils. There's a new homepage with
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:07:24 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/03/2014 07:28 AM, Diamond wrote:
> > On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:38:44 +0100
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> # Pacho Ramos (01 Dec 2014)
> >> # Upstream dead for a long time, use
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:38:44 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> # Pacho Ramos (01 Dec 2014)
> # Upstream dead for a long time, use sys-power/cpupower
> # instead. Removal in a month.
> sys-power/cpufrequtils
> x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpufreq
>
Give us an alternative before removing x11-plugins/gkrellm-
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:18:01 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, developers.
>
> I'm planning to commit this news item before >=2.1-r90 goes stable.
It's pretty strange, but after the last "emerge -1uDN world" system
update I lost bash-complition. It was removed
(app-admin/eselect-bashcomp-1.3.6
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:29:41 -0700
"W. Trevor King" wrote:
>
> So Git works great, and GitHub's web UI doesn't support all of Git's
> bells and whistles, so… switch to a different VCS? Personally, my
> conclusion is “just use Git from the command line”. It's not like
> you're abandoning long
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:08:11 -0700
"W. Trevor King" wrote:
> Git can check for copies if you like:
>
> $ git clone git://github.com/cerebrum/dr.git
> $ cd dr/
> $ git show --find-copies-harder 311df9b04
> …
> copy from games-strategy/openra/openra-20140608.ebuild
> copy to games-stra
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:00:59 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> What would you propose? The problem you raise is just as much an
> issue with cvs. I don't get a continuous history across revbumps in
> cvs today, so I don't really see a problem with moving to git.
I don't know what to propose. I stumbl
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:04:55 +1200
Kent Fredric wrote:
> What's more, you can in fact do:
>
> git mv foo-1.ebuild foo-2.ebuild
> git commit
>
> and you can still easily tell git to show that as a difference in a
> log.
>
> Example script to emulate this and example output:
> https://gist.githu
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:51:56 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> In general you want each commit to represent a single "change." That
> might be a revbump in a single package, or it might be a package move
> that involves touching 300 packages in a single commit.
Is it right that you are going to mo
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:25:02 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> Removals:
> net-misc/curl 2014-07-15 09:29:56 blueness
Is this a joke? Isn't curl as basic package as wget?
28 matches
Mail list logo
